Thanks Alex, I haven't laughed that hard in a long time!

I hope the braver, more honest hosts don't take this guy seriously, tho. It shows people like Peter are into real reporting and FAIRNESS, and in turn they have more integrity as a professional.

Scott Horton, an RBN host who says he's part jew, part mexican, goes off on racists in a confused and contradictory rant, apparently fearing the attractiveness of a politics he'd rather suppress.

http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/audio/grigg.mp3

The founders were both individualists and racists. The two go together. The jew Rand lie that they're opposed is foolish, merely the flip side of communist reductionism.

Horton takes some shots at other, braver, more honest RBN hosts. He also doesn't speak for RBN, and interviews all sorts of LRC types.

At the link is interview with William Grigg, after the rant. Grigg is a writer for the John Birch Society. In recent months his work has appeared at LRC.

JBS is a front group for jews, as Revilo Oliver pointed out. It's mission is to distract patriotic white Americans from discovering the root of the problem, and help them waste their energies in raceless ranting about rights.

Thanks Alex, I haven't laughed that hard in a long time!

I hope the braver, more honest hosts don't take this guy seriously, tho. It shows people like Peter are into real reporting and FAIRNESS, and in turn they have more integrity as a professional.

Let's be unstinting in our praise of Peter Schaenk, host of the Peter Principle, for having Whites on his show, such as Ed Steele last night. Make it clear to RBN that this is what people want to hear.

The LewRockwell crowd cannot win an open battle with the VNN crowd. It fears to take us on, because we have the truth about individualism, that it is not the highest value, but a thing that makes sense only within a racially secured context. The founders were NOT individualists. They did not say anything on two legs is a human with equal rights. "All men were created equal" is taken out of context by liberatarians as by leftists. Jefferson did not believe in racial equality, he was a White separatist. He knew if blacks were ever loosed on civilized white society, they would destroy it.

The libertarians are slaughtered by this point. They prove as dishonest in its face as the jews who created their bogus philosophy.

The Founders were racists -- all of them. They believed in degrees and classes and stations and competing rights and powers and responsibilities. They did not believe in abstract rights for individuals. Not even for white males. The libertarians should never be allowed to get away with claiming that the Founders had anything to do with their insane philosophy.

It's fine for Horton to praise jews as a group, but not for others to criticize them as a group. Works the opposite for racists.

Illogical? Yes, but don't tell him that. He's just glad that an Austin affiliate won't run any more of that "racist crap." Just the freedom stuff.

The founders were both individualists and racists. The two go together. The jew Rand lie that they're opposed is foolish, merely the flip side of communist reductionism.

Outside of the few port cities i.e. Boston, Philadelphia, New York, Charleston, our founders had to get along and co-operate. Otherwise it would have been death by indian, death by the French & indians, death by the Spanish & mestizos, starvation, disease, and wild animals. White folks had to help each other out. Individualism got you dead.

It fears to take us on, because we have the truth about individualism, that it is not the highest value, but a thing that makes sense only within a racially secured context.

Not only that, but that because individuals are not equal, they must not take on equal roles e.g. someone fit for manual labor should not be a voter, a decision-maker or have a public voice.

Horton had Jacob Hornberger on a show. I always figured he was another jew, but he said he came from a ranch on the Mexican border. His family employed illegals. He thinks there should be no borders.

What if men wish to use their individual freedom to form collectives that segregate from other men? How does that fit the libertarian's philosophy? It doesn't. Yet men always do seek precisely that.

By taking men as abstractions rather than real creatures, libertarianism is dashed to pieces on grounds of common sense. While pop Hornberger fills his coffers with extra money due to hiring illegals below rate, the rest of us suffer the negative externalities of mexicans - pretty much everything they exude, and all the welfare benefits the suck. Their buying stuff at Wal-Mart is small compensation for the trouble they cause.

Part jewish and part mexican? Probably means he's too dumb to swindle someone.

Horton says that the owners of RBN are in agreement with him, and are not going to rebroadcast any more of this "racist crap".

I wonder where all of this is going to go? Peter Shank may just get his lesson in Jews 101 yet.

Just look at all of the Jews on his interview list...

http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/

I can just see Uncle Jewie's hand up his ass running the puppet mouth.

Horton says that the owners of RBN are in agreement with him, and are not going to rebroadcast any more of this "racist crap".

I wonder where all of this is going to go? Peter Shank may just get his lesson in Jews 101 yet.

Just look at all of the Jews on his interview list...

http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/

I can just see Uncle Jewie's hand up his ass running the puppet mouth.

That's not what I said. He said affiliate in Austin. I don't know what means. RBN is based in Texas, somewhere near Austin.

My sense is there's a battle behind the scenes at RBN. They've discovered there's a market for race-realism. Do they want to play to it, or do they want to stick to safe "patriotism"?

Not only that, but that because individuals are not equal, they must not take on equal roles e.g. someone fit for manual labor should not be a voter, a decision-maker or have a public voice.

Prozak---Be glad your parents didn't immigrate from Russia until quite recently...

Did anyone hear Peter Shank last night? He kinda backed off the race thing, had some pretty harsh things to say about the racialists.

Maybe someone talked to him?

That's not what I said. He said affiliate in Austin. I don't know what means. RBN is based in Texas, somewhere near Austin.

My sense is there's a battle behind the scenes at RBN. They've discovered there's a market for race-realism. Do they want to play to it, or do they want to stick to safe "patriotism"?

When Scott Horton was talking about "an affiliate",he was probably referring to "Radio Free Austin", an FM microtransmitter network in the area here in Austin that broadcasts streams of shows from RBN as well as from other "patriot" networks like GCN (http://www.gcnlive.com) and WWFAR (http://www.wwfar.com).

I'm not really surprised that RBN hosts would pull punches on race- the network's founder,John Stadtmiller has made frequent degrading remarks towards WN groups in general on his own show, the "National Intel Report".
One could also note his frequent mentioning of 'dissident' jews like Aaron Zelman of jpfo.org and the Neturei Karta rabbis at nkusa.org. I suspect Mr.Stadtmiller knows most jews like the current Likudnik administration and have no problems with gun grabbing from us goyim, but to let that observation go by without at least a weak and desperate "See? See? There *ARE* some good Jews...really!" would break the ultimate taboo-one that Scott Horton decided to grovel before with his Cheech + Chongesque praise of jews and mestizos.

Unfortunately,most RBN hosts are only man enough to go so far.
Don't expect 'em to go further...not after the media did their best to reinforce the common stereotypes of WNs during the late Lefkow controversy.

If you want to prod Mr.Stadtmiller in the White direction,it might help to point out that his removal from GCN was in part due to his own semitically incorrect viewpoints. (He actually mentions this on occasion.) How is recognizing that racial groups have collective interests really that much different than recognizing the collective interests of various government organizations and secret societies?

I listened to a bit of the MP3. Horton sounds like a retard, but got me to think of a few things.

I think it is amazing that in politics today it is completely verbotten to discuss racial differences, or if differences exist it is only because of social environments, ideology, white racism, etc.

Even David Duke who wanted to break into mainstream politics had to moderate his position somewhat.