A lie with no foundation
President Bush Job Approval (12/23/05)
Quote, "Updated Daily by Noon Eastern
Friday December 23, 2005--Fifty percent (50%) of American adults approve of the way George W. Bush is performing his role as President. That's up six points since the President's speech on Sunday night."
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm
A typical mind control through media. How easy they manipulate a poll number to reach their goal.
An incompetent President who didn't know how to deal a disaster caused by hurricane. A totalitrian ruler who despites the civil liberty and monitor its own citizens. He is responsible for an unnecessary war which caused a huge loss of lives. Yet it's so easy to award him a ten points raise in poll.
Why? Because Feds (D.O.J.) wants to permanent the Patriot Act. They need a strong puppet President to support it. So they strengthen him with a rigged poll number.
Not only this. Insurgence and terrorist are cooperated too. Have you ever heard any "sucide" bombing recently? Or US soldiers' casulty? Either insurgence cooperated with puppet Iraqi government, or US media have censored the bad news to give you an expression there is a successful election in Iraq. The purpose is to support the notorious Bush.
The inside group used to extort by terror attack. With 911 and anthrax attack they got Patriot Act. With insurgence they find excuse to stay in Iraq until the next mid-east war. It's not a news that the controlled media issue government favourable articles and rigged poll produced by "information operation office".
This is why there is a peaceful Iraq these days(until now when I wrote this article) and several rigged poll to promote the President. Include this sudden jump approve rate. The Washington Post and the ABC followed the order to pull the number to 46% but shy to raise it anymore. They left it for rasmussenreports for the 50%. The brand name media took a little care of thier popularity anyhow.
-----------
Another poll in MSN at same time shows that 85% people want Bush impeached.
Do you believe President Bush's actions justify impeachment?
* 134522 responses Yes, between the secret spying, the deceptions leading to war and more, there is plenty to justify putting him on trial. 85%
No, like any president, he has made a few missteps, but nothing approaching "high crimes and misdemeanors." 5%
No, the man has done absolutely nothing wrong. Impeachment would just be a political lynching. 8%
I don't know. 2%
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904#survey
A lip service
Quote, ""It is true that much of the intelligence turned out to be wrong,'' Bush said. ``As president, I'm responsible for the decision to go into Iraq.'' "
What "responsibility" is it? A resignation? A cut of salary? A withdraw plan?
We heard he took responsibility for the slow reaction to the Katrina hurricane. Three months later, what has he done? I only heard that refugee's hotel expense will be cut soon. Is there any plan to help then? Where is the plan to re-build New Orleans?
Now once again he said he would take responsibility of that war caused by wrong information. Where is the plan to withdraw from Iraq? Where is the plan to re-build Iraq? And why until now there is no investigation how the "wrong information" caused the war. What the role he played in it?
Fiorina didn't run HP well. She was ousted. Steward traded four thousands shares by inside information.She took a prison sentence. CEO of World.com abused their powers, they are in jail. What does Bush take for the loss of thousands lives and the mis-spent of huge amount of money?
His responsibility is only a lip service. "I take the responsibility." That's all. Too easy to take it by a word. If he really think he should be responsible for those innocence who lost their lives in this unnecessary war, and hundred billions of tax-payers' dollars wasted in a black hole with no bottom. He should step down.
He didnt get cookies and milk after supper last Sunday 'cos of that blunder.
Deo Vindice
I plan on living forever,so far so good.
373. Extortion by scandal (1/12/06)
From Water gate, Chandra Levy to Abramoff, scandal is a tool to extort politicians by D.O.J.. A series of scandal broke off recently. I allege it was targeted at Supreme Court Judge nomination.
Bush had nominated three candidates for the vacancy of Supreme Court. Among them: Roberts and Alito are typical agents of D.O.J. Harriet Miers is a 'yes lady' who is similar to Clarence Thomas. All of them will judge to the order from D.O.J. not to the principle of the Constitution.
Roberts was nominated in early September and was confirmed in 9/28. He took oath on 9/29. During the hearing, on 9/24, a big title was on news: "Probe into Frist stock sale expands". Frist was the Senate Majority leader. Then the scandal spread to the House Majority leader, Tom DeLay. He was indicted on 9/28 by a conspiracy charge.
In October, the news of DeLay's case, Frist case and CIA leaking case (Rove and Libby) were mixed with the nomination of Harriet Miers. Harriet Miers gave up at last. It ends with the indiction of Cheney's aid: Libby.
There was a silence period in the end of the year for scandal and Supreme Court nomination. Then both came back in January. Alito goes into hearing on 1/10/06. Six days before his hearing, Abramoff scandal became top news on 1/4. On 1/8, news reported that Rep. DeLay abandons bid to keep GOP leadership.
Bush's nominee obviously are the representatives of D.O.J. not the Republicans. So there is opposition from the GOP. That's why the scandal targeted at the Republican politicians. Of course there are D.O.J.'s agents in Demos. But if they vote against their party opinion, their real face will be exposed. So the extortion this time aimed at GOP. To create a false appearance of a struggle between two parties not by a dictatorship. The fake mask of "democracy" has to be maintained.
374. A covert totalitarian (1/12/06)
The point is to control the Supreme Court. When Alito replaces O'connor, D.O.J. will control the majority votes of the Supreme Court. Thus they can justify the secret spying by the approval of Supreme Court.
Roberts was proved not work for the civil right but for the interest of D.O.J.. (see #357. Another attack from D.O.J. (11/12/05))
Alito is the same. Re: "Analysis shows Alito favours authorities"
" In one case, Judge Alito said police did not violate the rights of a mother and her 10-year-old daughter, who were strip-searched during a raid of a drug dealer's home."
"A Knight Ridder analysis of more than 300 written opinions by Alito, for example, reveals that he has almost never found a government search unconstitutional and that he has argued to relax warrant requirements and to broaden the kinds of searches that warrants permit."
You can expect under such a Supreme Court, what kind of judgement Americans will have. The administration will take over the power of legislation to authorize themselves the right to spy on its citizens. They will bypass the court system to search and seize without warrant.
US is proud with its democratic system: three independent powers check and balance. But now there is only one power left: the administration. The core is D.O.J.. D.O.J. controls law makers by scandal and election. It also sends the representatives of its own to control the Supreme Court. When they can do whatever they want to do, they think they are the "God". A name always referred by Pat Robertson and Jorge Bush to justify the power abusing.
At Bush's side, he said his action is "to save American's lives, to guard against terrorist".
At critic's side, Bush breaks the law.
But to "save American's lives, to guard aganinst terrorist" can be done under present law. Bush administration can apply a warrant from FISA court. It's easy to get. In emergence, there is a 72 hours grace period. Paper work can be done with plenty of times. Nothing obstacle D.O.J. to eavesdrop if they have proper reason. Why bypass the court?
When the justification of "save American's lives" is proved to be a cover up words, then go to the other side. The law not only protect us from outside aggression, it also protect us from internal power abusing of corrupt official.
This is the purpose of 4th Amendment. Protect citizen from "unreasonable search and arrest". The prevent us from a plant, a warrant needs evidence.
FISA court deal with foreign intelligence, the standard is low. Warrant is easy to get. The official only needs suspicion.
What Bush does is to authorize himself broad power to search. They don't need the monitor of a court. Neither evidence nor suspicion needed. What's difference from a totalitarian country?
Bush uses a beautiful decoration to violate the law. If he succeeds, civil rights will be seriously damaged. Terrorists may kill a few people but can't rob the freedom from Americans. Bush is worse, he took away the freedom from all citizens. He is more danger than terrorist.
380. What an "eavesdropping" really mean.(1/27/06)
Do you think the agents only limit to eavesdrop your phone? Do you expect terrorist will say, "You bomb the Golden gate bridge tomorrow morning at 9 o'clock" in communication? It maybe words such like, "Tomorrow will be zero hour. The real match will begin." But was it more likely about a football match or a boxing show? How do you save lives by listen to these vague words? If you think with brain, you know the matter is not that simple limited only to a secret "eavesdropping".
A warrant of "eavesdropping" means much more. With it agents can start a search on "suspects". A search on your home, your financial records, tracing, interview your friends.... This is something government and media never tell you.
To my experience it means much more. The harassing in Internet. The car trouble. Feds create car trouble so they can install instrument in the car to eavesdrop or tracking when you send it for repair. Feds block the drainage to create a flooding to see if you have valuable things to hide, property problem..... Finally, to prove they are correct, Feds plant, frame, murder to eliminate evidence.
A lot of people may have encountered such problem without aware of truth because Feds are professional criminals. But our founding father know the danger of power abusing from internal. They made the Constitution to protect us from the corrupt official. That's why a court search warrant is so strict which demands evidence.
D.O.J. uses a beautiful decoration to violate the law. If it succeeds, the foundational Constitution bypassed. Civil rights will be seriously damaged. Terrorists may kill a few people but can't rob the freedom from Americans. Bush is worse, he took away the civil rights from all citizens. He is more dangerous than the terrorist.
Quote, "Men, whites, Catholics boost Bush in latest AP poll
12/9/2005
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Bush's improved standing with whites, men, Catholics and other core supporters has been a key factor in pushing his job approval rating up to 42%. That's the highest level since summer."
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-12-09-bushpoll_x.htm
Does the population of whites, men increased by 5%? Or 5% of people turn to be Catholics? If these are core supporters, how can they be counted flip flop 5%? When "information operation" office manipulates the poll number, they pick up a reason by hand. No matter how absurd it is.
Poll is a tool used to control public's mind. It represents the intention of the Inside group not people's.
Pope John paul had had a strong message for President George W. Bush: God is not on your side if you invade Iraq." So how can catholics a core supporter to Bush?
Quote, "U.S. Church Alliance Denounces Iraq War
By BRIAN MURPHY, AP Religion Writer Sat Feb 18,
PORTO ALEGRE, Brazil - A coalition of American churches sharply denounced the U.S.-led war in Iraq on Saturday, accusing Washington of "raining down terror" and apologizing to other nations for "the violence, degradation and poverty our nation has sown."
The statement, issued at the largest gathering of Christian churches in nearly a decade, also warned the United States was pushing the world toward environmental catastrophe with a "culture of consumption" and its refusal to back international accords seeking to battle global warming.
The two-page statement from the WCC group came at the midpoint of a 10-day meeting of more than 4,000 religious leaders, scholars and activists discussing trends and goals for major Christian denominations for the coming decades.
The churches said they had "grown heavy with guilt" for not doing enough to speak out against the Iraq war and other issues.
Where do these "Bush supporters" come from? From the magician's hat of media's poll. The actual figure maybe well below 20%.
How many US soldiers are in Iraq? 130,000? The suspected terrorist are much more than that. How much does it cost to wiretap such a big army ?
Quote, "325,000 Names on Terrorism List
Rights Groups Say Database May Include Innocent People
By Walter Pincus and Dan EggenWashington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, February 15, 2006; Page A01"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/14/AR2006021402125.html?nav=mb
The bombing of Shiite Mosque shrine was said to be done by Al Qaida. The motive is to provoke a civil war in Iraq. Who benefit from it? Not the Sunny Muslim, not the Shiite Muslim. War only hurt them. It's samething like 911 attack. The 911 caused indignation of the world against Islam. And became the justification for Bush to start the Mid-east war.
Then what is the purpose to bomb the Shiite Mosque shrine? Obviously to give Bush an excuse to stay in Iraq. There is riot there, so he needs more troops to maintain the security there. And these troops will be used for the next war, either for Syria or Iran.
It's a preparation for another war. So said Al Qaida is only a tool manipulated by US and Israel intelligence. Many people now realized 911 was a hoax . If you can view the current affair in same way, you may see clearer how the Inside group push forward their war and conquer policy in Mid-east - manipulate a "terrorist attack".
Vermont, the home of braves and the land of free.
The people there still have the courage which many Americans have lost.
All towns in Vermont vote to impeach Bush!
A single Vermont community's call for the impeachment of President Bush turned into a chorus Tuesday night, with town meetings across southern Vermont echoing the demand that Congress act to remove the president
After Hurricane Katrina wiped out most of New Orleans, President Bush
said on television , "I don't think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees." But a recent tape revealed that FEMA had warned him about the levee before the disaster.''We are fully prepared.'' Bush said.
Clinton lied to cover up a personal affair. It hurts nothing. Yet he was impeached.
Bush lied to an unjust war. A lot of people died. He was rewarded a second term.
Now he was revealed lying about his pre-acknowlege about the dangerous situation of New Orleans leeve. Should he be responsible for the one thousand loss of lives? Yet it seems nothing will happen to him.
You may get lessons from these events that how US is ruled by an Inside group. They manipulated the media and intelligence to control public mind and politicians. They can oust a president by a trifle but keep a killer on the bench because they need more war in Mid-east.
After Hurricane Katrina wiped out most of New Orleans, President Bush
said on television , "I don't think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees." But a recent tape revealed that FEMA had warned him about the levee before the disaster.''We are fully prepared.'' Bush said.Clinton lied to cover up a personal affair. It hurts nothing. Yet he was impeached.
Bush lied to an unjust war. A lot of people died. He was rewarded a second term.
Now he was revealed lying about his pre-acknowlege about the dangerous situation of New Orleans leeve. Should he be responsible for the one thousand loss of lives? Yet it seems nothing will happen to him.
You may get lessons from these events that how US is ruled by an Inside group. They manipulated the media and intelligence to control public mind and politicians. They can oust a president by a trifle but keep a killer on the bench because they need more war in Mid-east.
This is absolutely correct, and I have to say your analysis in recent posts is spot on. But I notice you fail to mention that this "inside group" is basically big media jews/and jew lackeys, supporting an Israel-centric foreign policy and sacrificing American lives, treasure, reputation, and even the freedom of the American people, on the altar of "what's good for the jews and israel." These kikes have engaged in a program designed purposefully to destroy, not only the U.S. and other Western countries, but the very White race which founded these countries. And when they're done with us, they'll be moving on to you orientals. These jews are bad news for everybody, so get on board and start naming the jew.
Jews Did 9/11
Voting machines removed in Grafton
By CAROL ROBIDOUX
Union Leader Staff
Thursday, Mar. 16, 2006
Grafton – No matter how you do the math, 193 "yeas" plus 198 "nays" don't add up to 369 votes.
That faulty equation — results of a warrant article vote from Tuesday's election ballot — was the first clue for Grafton town officials that something was wrong.
As a result, two voting machines used to collect ballots in the annual town and school district meetings are now in the custody of the Attorney General's Office, removed from the town yesterday, said Grafton Selectman Jennie Joyce.
What if the add up was correct but some "Nay"s were transfer to "yeas"?
Nobody could know the mistake because voter only knew the vote of his own.
That's how Bush could be selected President.
"War President"
Cold war was the war between two big camps. None of the Presidents during these war had titled themseves as "war president" and squeezeing to erode the civil liberty. Bush does. He extort people to expand his power.
In cold war, did the communist camp has more resource to spy, perpetrate, provoking by war, etc? How is Al Qaida? "They are on the run.", "hiding in caves". Then why does Bush want more?
He activated an unnecessary war. His 'information workshop" continually produced tapes of "Bin Laden", "Zhawahiry" to intimidate public. He created more "extremists", "fanatics" by his war and with which, he blackmails American people for more power, money.
Now he is under fire of "secret spying". Beware he starts another "terror attack" to save himself when he is in an impasse.
Save the reputation of poll (4/23/06)
Bush's approve rate may have never been higher than 30% after he activated the Iraq war. So even 33% is an exageration. Then why do we see a recent down fall of Bush's rate?
It is to save your belief on media. More and more people start to realize media and poll are mind control tools of government. They realize Bush's selection was the result of a rigged voting system and the media propaganda and poll cheating.
So they let Bush's rate down. A fact they hard to cover up anymore. It doesn't hurt. Bush has been in his second term. He couldn't go for a third term. Bush himself said he didn't care about it. A bird is in hand. Who cares the other birds in the woods.
But that will save your confidence on media and poll. See, we gave a fair judgement on that bad boy. Trust us next time when we gave new poll.
But keep in mind how a war criminal could be selected as a president twice and how the media has helped his selection. Don't be blinded by cover up propaganda. The recent down fall of Bush's rate is to save the reputation of poll so they can go on to cheat.
Beware of another "terror attack". Bush got his seat by "terror attack". To save his reputation, he may use it again.