Hello all,

JP Slovjanski,

I've been reading some of your posts and I'm curious. I'm part Slavic myself, my dad was Bulgarian. I have never heard of the last name "Slovjanski." Your last name is actually the Bulgarian word for "Slavic" with a minor variation in the transliteration of Bulgarian to English (an english "a" substituted for "o" Bulgarian, which is very close to the same sound depending on position in the word):

&#1089]

My name is Ukrainian; Slovjanski is also "slavic" in Ukrainian, as well as in Russian with a minor change in pronunciation(and in Polish as well).

Hey morons!! BAN ME!!!

 

Hi Nick

Interesting that someone with an understanding of languages questions this idiot. I went to school with lots of guys from eastern Europe and NEVER met anyone with that name. My opininon is JP is and IMPOSTOR who may well be paid (peanuts) to waste our time. Question is who is paying this intellectually challenged imbecile. Either that, or he's at home living with his mom and doesn't get out much, or get much of anything else....if you get my drift.

Bernie

Of course Bernie, because you are so important, because your life has MEANING!!! You've become too much of a danger to Mr. Silverstein!!! Now he needs to hire someone to specifically defend against YOU!! Good for you Bernie!!

NOTE TO MODERATORS: Why are we allowing obvious schizophrenic people on this forum?

Slovjanski, do you think that it is possible that Israel/Mossad and the U.S. government intentionally let the Islamic terrorists to get through so it could have an excuse to respond as it has?

This is FAR more plausible than anything these others are advocating. Keep in mind that NONE of them go through the trouble of outlining THEIR theory of 9-11.

OK, the total fraud and possible jew "slovjanski" won't be showing his dirty ass around here anymore. If he does ask him about his army time and ask him about his time in Russia.

999 used to call "slovjanski" a jew all the time. I was somewhat sceptical about that. After reading "slovjanski"'s posts for a week or two it became clear. I was wrong and should have known better, I take pride in my jewdar but I missed the boat regarding "slovjanski" (the "Slavic") ... Nice goin 999.

Cheers
Nick

P.S. Nice goin MOMUS especially too, and a few others. You were challenging JP "Slavic" (Slovjanski, fake name, ha ha ) when no one else wanted to. This fuckin board needs an Orkin Man to clear out the jew and anti liars once every week or two.

The name is real, the time in the army was boring, I lived in Russia BEFORE I was in the army. You lose.

ps- If you knew that much about language you would know that names which denote ethnicity are not uncommon at all. Polyakov is a popular Russian name found in families with Polish ancestry, for example. Secondly, the name Slovjanski, as in Slavic itself, has a root meaning- Slov:word, and the name can be just as easily interpretted with either meaning.

You know what's ironic about all this? I CHALLENGED these 9-11 Conspiracy theories for EVIDENCE as a way of trying to HELP White Nationalists. Far too many "WNs" spend most of their time talking on forums or talking together in their own cliques till they lose touch with the people they are supposed to be recruiting. The fact is that the person on the street will want PROOF of something, particularly if that something is going to be used as an argument on why the target subject should massively change his or her worldview. They are not going to sit there and immediately say: "YOU'RE RIGHT!! IT WAS THE JEWS!!! I'M RUNNING HOME NOW TO THROW OUT ALL MY HIP-HOP CDS!!!!"

You will be asked for EVIDENCE, you will have the rules of LOGIC applied to your arguments. If you cannot HANDLE that, you will lose. In real life when someone asks you for these things, you can't just call them a Jew and be on your way. They are more likely to punch you in the face- I know I would.

Oh but wait! I just remembered!!! You guys don't CARE about recruiting people!! You don't care about ideology, spreading National Socialism, etc. You don't care about CHANGING our society or having anything to do with CHANGING our situation whatsoever. You are only concerned with posting the same crap online to your fellow nutjobs and stroking eachother's cocks about how much you think you know.

Real useful to our race. Who else here has been to any anti-war protests? Who else here has held anti-Israeli signs at a massive protest between ARA members on one side with pro-war protesters on the other? How many of you have ever shouted down a megaphone wielding pro-war protester? None of you would know what that's like because you don't leave your house.

You will be asked for EVIDENCE, you will have the rules of LOGIC applied to your arguments. If you cannot HANDLE that, you will lose. In real life when someone asks you for these things, you can't just call them a Jew and be on your way.

You're correct sir. There is enough reasons & facts to expose and name the Jew without the far-flung conspiracy nonsense.

I'll state it again in a way that most white people can understand. The Arabs bombed the towers because of OUR SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL. Had we not supported Israel, 9-11 never happens.

Real simple isn't it?

You're correct sir. There is enough reasons & facts to expose and name the Jew without the far-flung conspiracy nonsense.

I'll state it again in a way that most white people can understand. The Arabs bombed the towers because of OUR SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL. Had we not supported Israel, 9-11 never happens.

Real simple isn't it?

Of course, it IS really simple. Of course it is simple to explain that to real live people on the street, but in an internet forum full of conspiracy junkies ACTUALLY "spreading the word" and convincing live people is not their objective. Take MOMUS for example, how many posts does he have about ideology, National Socialism, ideas for activism, recommendations, anecdotes about talking to people about racial beliefs, etc.? None of that is of concern to these people. They are soley concerned with living out this fantasy where they "fight the Jew" by exposing his conspiracies on an already favorable website. In this way they can pretend their lives have meaning because they "know" something that others allegedly don't know.

To show how pathetic they truly are:

1. Note how they like to frame the debate: We can ONLY talk about building 7! ONLY BUILDING 7! No analogies, no comparisons, NOTHING, only building 7! Any attempt to make an analogy or mention anything in comparison will be called "changing the subject".

2. Why would they believe that someone asking for evidence is a Jew? Are a majority of White Americans anti-Semitic? Would only a Jew ask for evidence of such a conspiracy? The reason why they have to cast their detractors as Jews is because this is the only place where they ever "fight the Jew". They have to pretend they are "struggling" against Jews to justify their continued existence, so they MUST believe that their opponent is a Jew.

3. Notice that the retards believe that if you QUESTION the evidence pointing to Jews involved in a certain conspiracy, they will say you are "DEFENDING JEWS". That is because in their retarded mind, the Jews can only be "bad" by being behind all these massive, tragic conspiracies. Ideas like manipulations of moral standards and social norms in a society are simply too complicated for retards to understand.

4. Most of all, note that NONE of these people offers an alternative scenario to 9-11. They offer bits and pieces but none of them can provide a cursory explanation. This is because they believe that if the official theory can't explain something, it is automatically proof for another theory. Of course anyone familiar with science or logic knows this not to be the case.

5. What sort of "Jew" would have spent YEARS writing all sorts of scathing indictment of Jews(not to mention real life activism) and yet "defend" the Jews on one subject? Doesn't make a lot of sense does it?

6. The conspiracy nuts ignore anything inconvenient to their theory. For example, you can't trust the mainstream media- yet the source of all their "evidence" is always from the mainstream media. Conspiracy nuts don't like to be asked about their qualifications either. Anyone can look at a video or photograph and know exactly what is going on.

7. The "official story" only has ONE version and the first version to be revealed is the ONLY one ever. Nothing in history has ever been revised after the fact at all. At least that's what the nuts claim.

Jp is back, blathering empty gibberish, and his favorite sock-puppet solemnly intones, "You are correct, sir!"

Hey JP, we're still waiting for you to point out the page in the FEMA report that explains why WTC #7 collapsed on 9-11. Want to try it again? Got your "spin function" working?

Incidentally, I searched for your use of "search function"; fourteen times you have used that phrase. Not once have you explained WTC #7's collapse.

Jp is back, blathering empty gibberish, and his favorite sock-puppet solemnly intones, "You are correct, sir!"

Hey JP, we're still waiting for you to point out the page in the FEMA report that explains why WTC #7 collapsed on 9-11. Want to try it again? Got your "spin function" working?

Incidentally, I searched for your use of "search function"]

Why don't YOU explain to us what happened to it?

FACT: Many conspiracy theorists point to FEMA's preliminary report, which said there was relatively light damage to WTC 7 prior to its collapse. With the benefit of more time and resources, NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated. "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM. "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom--approximately 10 stories--about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner.

NIST investigators believe a combination of intense fire and severe structural damage contributed to the collapse, though assigning the exact proportion requires more research. But NIST's analysis suggests the fall of WTC 7 was an example of "progressive collapse," a process in which the failure of parts of a structure ultimately creates strains that cause the entire building to come down. Videos of the fall of WTC 7 show cracks, or "kinks," in the building's facade just before the two penthouses disappeared into the structure, one after the other. The entire building fell in on itself, with the slumping east side of the structure pulling down the west side in a diagonal collapse. (NOTE: Perfectly on its "footprint"? Maybe you're NOT qualified to determine what is happening in the video!)

According to NIST, there was one primary reason for the building's failure: In an unusual design, the columns near the visible kinks were carrying exceptionally large loads, roughly 2000 sq. ft. of floor area for each floor. "What our preliminary analysis has shown is that if you take out just one column on one of the lower floors," Sunder notes, "it could cause a vertical progression of collapse so that the entire section comes down."

There are two other possible contributing factors still under investigation: First, trusses on the fifth and seventh floors were designed to transfer loads from one set of columns to another. With columns on the south face apparently damaged, high stresses would likely have been communicated to columns on the building's other faces, thereby exceeding their load-bearing capacities.

Hey morons!! BAN ME!!!

 

Also note how MOMUS will refer to any analysis of his mental condition and his past transgressions as "blather" or "gibberish". It is possible that he REALIZES that he is a coward, and a phony, with no possible contribution to our race, but does not want to admit it. What he gets out of this WTC7 story is a mystery. He will ignore all past fuckups to focus on it, believing that the inability of someone who had little research on the subject and no involvement with the investigation(that's me) to fully explain the collapse to his satisfaction somehow constitutes some sort of moral "victory". Of course normal people see the obvious logical flaws in that idea.

And of course who could forget the hilarious occasion when MOMUS tried to "call my bluff" about my activism and was revealed to be a jackass after I promptly dug up news reports of my old statements to media and after-action reports of successful recruitment projects?

More goddamned blather. "SCOOPED OUT?" Scooped out by WHAT? King Kong? Fire doesn't "scoop out" concrete and steel.

Pure gibberish, couched in official-sounding language.

"On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom--approximately 10 stories--about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." .

Real easy to explain. The foundation of #7 was severely damaged by the collapse of the two HUGE towers that collapsed earlier across the street. That along with the fires is what caused #7 to collapse.

The media knew hours before #7 went down that it was going to collapse. How did the media know it was going to collapse hours prior if bombs is what brought down the building?

Lay off the catnip and the conspiracy theories.

More goddamned blather. "SCOOPED OUT?" Scooped out by WHAT? King Kong? Fire doesn't "scoop out" concrete and steel.

Pure gibberish, couched in official-sounding language.

You are not qualified to determine what is "pure gibberish". So far your biggest evidence is "I SAW THE VIDEO AND IT LOOKS LIKE DEMOLITIONS TO ME".

Did the report SAY that fire "scooped" out that part of the building? NO. It stated that the building was SCOOPED OUT. That is what PEOPLE WHO INVESTIGATED THE BUILDING SAID THEY FOUND.

As the above report states, the NIST engineers are STILL investigating the causes. So maybe you should wait until the FINAL report is released and then critique that.

It stated that the building was SCOOPED OUT. That is what PEOPLE WHO INVESTIGATED THE BUILDING SAID THEY FOUND.

A 130 story building across the street goes down and Momus thinks that wouldn't affect a smaller building right across the street. I'm surprised that #7 stayed up for as long as it did considering the fatal damage it got. Remember, the media for hours kept reporting #7 was about to collapse. How could the media have known that if bombs were going to bring it down?

They couldn't.

Again, there is enough reason to name and expose the Jew without the conspiracy crap.

Then who or what "scooped" it? Do tell.

You are not qualified to determine what is "pure gibberish". So far your biggest evidence is "I SAW THE VIDEO AND IT LOOKS LIKE DEMOLITIONS TO ME".

Did the report SAY that fire "scooped" out that part of the building? NO. It stated that the building was SCOOPED OUT. That is what PEOPLE WHO INVESTIGATED THE BUILDING SAID THEY FOUND.

As the above report states, the NIST engineers are STILL investigating the causes. So maybe you should wait until the FINAL report is released and then critique that.