I have followed Ron Paul's run for president semi-closely. Dr. No, as he is known, is absolutely the best serious candidate out there. His stand on almost every issue resonates well with White people, and I agree with his stand a majority of the issues. He is as close to being a racist as a presidential candidate is allowed to be today. The Republican establishment and the jewsmedia are trying their best to ignore him, but that is not working. No other Republican candidate, not even Tom Tancredo, whose stand on immigration is the only issue I agree with him on, would get my vote. Of course when I say I would vote for Ron Paul, that is NOT saying I would vote Republican. I guess if I voted for Paul I would technically be voting Republican, but I would NOT be voting for the party but the man.

Here is the speculation part of this post: what if Ron Paul does not get the Republican nomination? I would love for him to get the GOP's nod for the office of President, but what if a more jew-friendly candidate gets the nod? Actually, all of the other 8 candidates are jew-friendly. Ron Paul is a strict Constitutionalist. If a bill being voted on conflicts with the Constitution, he votes no every time. The Constitution Party, a third party formed in 1992, advocates that American government follow the Constitution to the letter. That means a HUGE reduction in government and government agencies, no involvement in foreign wars, no racial quotas in any way, shape or form, etc. In other words, The CP wants to transform America back to the way it was before the War of the Rebellion (in theory, at least). Do you see where I am going here? Also, on their website, the CP has pledged to support Paul 100% if he does not get the Republican nomination. How's that for a ringing endorsement? It sounds like Paul has a place to go if the GOP snubs him, which they are trying desperately to do. Of course I realize that the CP is not perfect because the document they adhere to is not perfect. In fact, amendments 13-27 to the US Constitution are IMO unconstitutional. Yes, that sounds strange, but amendments 13-15 (Reconstruction Amendments) were never properly ratified. Therefore, they should not be amendments to our constitution. Since these three amendments were never properly ratified, it stands to reason that amendments 16-27 could not have been properly ratified either. Anyway, the CP is far from ideal as a political party. However, they are far better than the two establishment parties on so many levels I cannot count. If Ron Paul got their nomination as their presidential candidate, it could shake things up a bit. Of course, he is already saking things up a bit, but if his run with the GOP ends, what will he do? Any thoughts?