I saw the below quote on a comment section at Mangan's and thought he made his case extremely well, the argument is airtight and the facts fully verifiable. I hope to be this effective someday.

He was responding to a comment that went, "The goddamn edifice of American 20th century scientific accomplishments rests on the back on the Jews!"

This is a good illustration of a very typical White/jew double standard. A wild boast of collective accomplishment which would be considered "supremacist" if it were made about Whites. Such statements are instead considered perfectly normal and reasonable when made about jews. What explains that?

A related double standard, the first half of which has gotten most of the attention here, is the taboo against discussing the collective malfeasance of jews, versus the increasing popularity of blaming Whites for collective malfeasance, eg. stealing indian land, enslaving blacks, gassing jews, colonizing/exploiting the third world. Again I ask, what explains this? Note the constrast. Blaming Whites today for the crimes of yesteryear is done solely on the basis of our race. Jews are implicitly exempt, which we know because 1) they're one of the prominent victim groups, 2) they're also prominent casters of these aspersions, and 3) if they felt in any way implicated their numerous and prominent advocacy groups would decry such charges as the ill-willed race-based "blood libels" they are.

It is considered controversial if not indicative of malice to note (especially without excusing) the outsized role jews have played in agitating in favor of non-Whites generally (civil rights, hate crimes), in favor of non-White immigrants (open borders, amnesty), against White identity (race denial, Franz Boas), against Whites directly (anti-racism, Whiteness studies, Noel Ignatiev, Tim Wise, Susan Sontag), and against White institutions (cultural marxism, the Frankfurt school). The painful reality is that these outsized roles reveal the too often ignored or downplayed alienation, resentment, and hate coming from jews. Flapping arms and making shrill accusations that "the anti-semites" are "insane übermenschen" and "paranoid morons" is a smokescreen. The long-term and deliberately pursued aggression against Whites may be stealthy, but it cannot be reasonably denied. Thus the fallback is to ridicule, discredit, and condemn anyone who speaks of it, hoping both to silence them and make an example for anyone else who might consider speaking out.

Because this view is so often successfully squashed, on faux-White/pro-jew forums the absurd assertion can and is being made that the West's problem is "suicide". It amounts to yet another "blood libel" against Whites, because "the idea" on such forums is that jews certainly didn't play any significant role in harming the West (paucity of jews in Norway, QED) therefore we crazy/lazy/stupid/docile Whites can only be doing all this anti-White stuff to ourselves.

I'm sorry. If that kind of scapegoating makes more sense to you than the idea that a small army of energetic and capable jews, harboring a thinly disguised (but sometimes overt) atagonistic attitude toward Whites, achieved powerful positions from which they have made and continue to make outsized contributions to the edifice of the deleterious anti-White regime we now live under (quite beside their outsized contributions to the edifice of science) then I submit you're the one who's insane.

Whites who lend a hand directly to those who aggress against us are beneath contempt. Those who join the aggressors' apologists are, at best, misguided.

That's my idea.

Excellent.