A deceased white nationalist, chemistry professor, and coin collector named Robert McCorkill left, in his Will, his estate to the National Alliance, a white nationalist organization in the United States. It was valued at about $250,000.

The Jews of the Southern Poverty Law Center didn't think this was proper because the National Alliance espouses political views opposed to their own. So they filed a lawsuit in Canada challenging McCorkill's Will. There is absolutely no precedent for what happened next.

The Jews won. Even though McCorkill had spent part of his life working for the National Alliance, and even though McCorkill had bequeathed his valuable coin collection to the National Alliance unconditionally, the Jews succeeded in having McCorkill's Will voided. The Jews stood up in court and called the National Alliance a few politically-charged nasty names, such as "white supremacist" and "neo-Nazi," and the judge agreed that a group that could be described in such a way wasn't worthy of being anyone's beneficiary, no matter that the deceased benefactor, himself, had believed to the contrary.

"This is a movement that very rarely sees hundreds of thousands of dollars. Typically these people have no money at all," said a spokesperson for the SPLC.

"The concern is that the most dangerous neo-Nazi group in America will be very much brought back to life,” said Mark Potok, a senior fellow at the Alabama-based civil rights group and a top expert on hate and extremist groups."

That had indeed been possible. What the money from the sale of the McCorkill coin collection would have allowed the National Alliance to have done, had they won the lawsuit, is set their message before the American people, along with supporting evidence that they could check, and decide for themselves whether or not the National Alliance was a group worthy of their endorsement and patronage.

What the Jews of the Southern Poverty Law Center and their judicial lackeys in Canada have done is interpose their own judgment about the National Alliance's worthiness of support so that the individual members of American and Canadian civil society would not get the opportunity to make their own choices.

And the lawyer for the white nationalist group, upon filing an appeal to the judge's decision, was fined for having the temerity to appeal the decision.

If this precedent is consistently followed, then any legacy, any bequest, any devisement — in any Will — can be challenged by the Jews and, more or less, stolen with the court and its judge being an accessory to the theft. By the evidence, Canada doesn't have a judicial system so much as an organized crime ring pretending to be a judicial system.

Both the original judge and the judge of the appeals court in New Brunswick spoke quite as if they were mouthing words from a script that the Jewish groups had written.

In a sense, the world has been changed by this case. Now, if you would leave a lot of money, or something of significant value, to an unpopular group or to a person who is in general political disfavor, then you must do so while you are still alive. The Jews have used the courts to sabotage your right to bestow your property posthumously through your Will in accordance with your wishes.

Comments transferred from Facebook

Diane Strelnikova: This is why you need to establish irrevocable trusts in a friendly jurisdiction.

Wayne Sims: The old guy probably had no idea the courts of his country would betray him in this way. Nothing like it had ever happened before.

Diane Strelnikova: I agree, he wrote a proper will. I believe the SPLC used his sister to challenge it. It's very important when making a will to name the people that you deliberately want to exclude from inheriting.

Jeff T Rowed: Good to know now. I'm sure the kikes will figure out a way around that too. This was blatantly illegal and immoral.

Wayne Sims: Jews say, "We don't like your opinions, so you will not be allowed to own anything."

Jeff T Rowed: It's literally down to "If we don't like you, we can break and remake the rules."

Wayne Sims: When the law works as it is supposed to, which is to say impartially, the friendliness of a jurisdiction is irrelevant. When jurisprudence is correctly done, its issue does not depend on politics or on personal relationships. Special treatment, whether in privilege or in penalty, in the absence of legislation to warrant it, is always corruption.

As I think upon it, the politically motivated voiding of Robert McCorkill's Will and the nullification of his bequest to the National Alliance is another instance in which a civil rights group has violated the freedom of association of persons. In this case, it was Robert McCorkill's right to associate posthumously with a political activist group that he had endorsed and supported during his life. His freedom in carrying out his very last act was denied by the Jews and by the Canadian courts, which the Jews seem to have under their control.

Did you know that the National Alliance paid Dr. McCorkill's funeral costs?