Forum
- Home
- Forum
Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
In the Bible, does Jesus always tell the truth?
The faithful will say yes! If there is any source of the ultimate truth, it came straight out of the mouth of Jesus!
The following is a passage right out of the King James version of the Bible. Many people are unaware of the following verse of the Bible because it tells the ultimate truth of all truths. It is an unfortunate fact, that most priests, ministers and pastors are charlatans and they're under the spell of the jew and they will lie about what these plainly spoken words of Jesus really mean. But even the dullest wit can easily see what Jesus meant when he said that the jews are the children of Satan!
[color="Red"]John 8:44 Ye are of [your] father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
As we can easily see, that Jesus was calling the jews the devil’s children. Jesus also said that when the devil spoke, he spoke lies and “his own” (children) where liars as well. Go to the link above for context of the preceding and succeeding verses for additional clarity.
Let’s try to understand here exactly what Jesus meant. He said that jews are the children, or in other words, the descendants of the devil, therefore they have direct lineage to the Prince of Darkness. And if we believe that Jesus wasn't a liar, that this would mean that all jews would carry the genetic heritage of Satan within the very core of their DNA. Throughout the Bible, descendants and their blood is stressed as being of vital importance. Could this be the reason? Because the DNA in the blood will ultimately reveal the truth?
Now we come to the point of this thread.
Modern DNA genetic forensics can verify parentage of a person. The genetic sciences have even advanced so far whereby it is possible to verify parentage several generations going backward in time. There are many organizations that specialize in genetic genealogy, and for a fee they will search for one’s genetic lineage and create a family tree authenticated by scientifically accurate DNA analysis methodologies.
See DNA Heritage HERE
As genetic science continues to make advances, it will eventually be possible to go back further and further in time to trace our ultimate genetic ancestors. And therefore it is only a matter of time before science will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the jews are the children of Beelzebub the prince of the devils. It’s in their blood!
The ink of the learned is as precious as the blood of the martyr. For one drop of ink may make millions think.
Posted : 01/05/2006 6:32 pm
Topic starter
The ink of the learned is as precious as the blood of the martyr. For one drop of ink may make millions think.
Posted : 01/05/2006 7:02 pm
lol I always bring this up when I'm dealing with Christheads. I mean you can't get any more direct than that.
It's "them" against "us." It isn't an economic or social struggle. It isn't politics, religion, economics or anything else so complicated. It's as simple as cat versus mouse; as White versus Indians. It's tribe versus tribe.
GLR in "White Power"
"Can you lend a nigga a pencil?"
Posted : 01/05/2006 7:22 pm
In much of the New Testament, Jesus debates with the jews. This fact makes me think that, if he existed in the way we think of him as existing, he was himself probably only part jew. No doubt, in life, he did have a father -- but since, as the jews claim, his father was a Roman goy soldier -- to the jews, he would have had no father at all -- hence, the "virgin birth." Just a thought.
But, if Jesus was an immortal or highly enlightened one, it would seem his prime quest was to save the jews from judaism, to save the jews from themselves. Had he succeeded, the jews would be nothing today -- and we, everything. The jews without judaism would probably not have survived genetic assimilation into the vastly larger White race. When they refused to be so saved (they knew Jesus' ideas would destroy them as a people), he offered his ideas (unfortunately) to the gullible goyim (and his ideas destroyed us).
That's one of my takes on the Jesus question.
Posted : 01/05/2006 9:50 pm
In much of the New Testament, Jesus debates with the jews. This fact makes me think that, if he existed in the way we think of him as existing, he was himself probably only part jew. No doubt, in life, he did have a father -- but since, as the jews claim, his father was a Roman goy soldier -- to the jews, he would have had no father at all -- hence, the "virgin birth." Just a thought.
But, if Jesus was an immortal or highly enlightened one, it would seem his prime quest was to save the jews from judaism, to save the jews from themselves. Had he succeeded, the jews would be nothing today -- and we, everything. The jews without judaism would probably not have survived genetic assimilation into the vastly larger White race. When they refused to be so saved (they knew Jesus' ideas would destroy them as a people), he offered his ideas (unfortunately) to the gullible goyim (and his ideas destroyed us).
That's one of my takes on the Jesus question.
However, it was not Jesus but the Jew Saul who became the apostle Paul that brought Christianity to the non-Jews. Nazi ideologist Alfred Rosenberg said that the purpose of this had been the weakening of the White race and the paving of the way toward Jewish world control.
I highly doubt that Jesus converted a single non-Jew in his lifetime.
The following WN leaders are too wedgy: Craig Cobb (hates Peter Schaenk and Christians), Peter Schaenk (hates Atheists and Pagans)
Posted : 01/05/2006 9:57 pm
However, it was not Jesus but the Jew Saul who became the apostle Paul that brought Christianity to the non-Jews. Nazi ideologist Alfred Rosenberg said that the purpose of this had been the weakening of the White race and the paving of the way toward Jewish world control.
I highly doubt that Jesus converted a single non-Jew in his lifetime.
Yes, I have read that and can well believe that too. (In fact, that's why I said my prior post was one of my takes, one of my opinions.) And I should have said -- you make a good point -- that Jesus didn't necessarily personally spread his message to the goyim, but that, having failed with the jews, his had his disciples spread his message to us. Or maybe it was just Paul, the jew, spreading his verbal jew poison upon us.
Posted : 01/05/2006 10:23 pm