The flaming Marxist, King Charles owns Australia, The UK, New Zealand, Canada, etc.

He is the head of state. This means he has all the power and owns all the land and all the people within.

They will tell you he has no power, takes no decisions, and that he is not interested in politics. Any government in these countries are his private government, not the people's. Elections are effectively a sham. The parliaments and the political parties are a sham.

The private property rights are weak and not clearly defined.

There is an income tax in all these countries, and that means there is no private property rights.

There is a property tax in all these countries, and that means you don't own the land, no matter what the deed or “common law” says.

You don't own your money, clothes, guns, bank accounts, yourself, or your children. You are a subject, a slave.

If you have private property rights it would be illegal to lock you down, force any vaccines, ban guns and weaponry, force public schooling, make you use ID for banking, tax your income or property, etc.

This means your presumed “rights” wasn't rights at all, it was only privileges. Privileges can be taken away, rights cannot.

Your pension or disability check can be taken away. Your freedom of movement, assembly and speech can be taken away.

The King or his private government can take away these privileges under the pretense of “public health,” “protecting the environment,” “pollution,” “public safety,” etc.

They can lock you down, inject you with vaccines and forcibly inject your nation with non-whites.

They hide this privilege-system under the guise of a welfare state. Welfare is applied Marxism. The first law of Marxism is the removal of private property, private ownership.

The more I think about this, the more fucked up it is.

We have the same problem here, our King owns all of Norway, and he has absolute power. This means he owns all the land and all the people. Naturally, this leaves zero power for the parliament and the political parties.

The King's the head of the government. Our Constitution makes it perfectly clear that it's his personal government. At any time, the King can choose a new private government.

I haven't read these countries respective constitutions, so correct me if I'm wrong, and that there is, in fact, clearly defined private property rights for individuals.

I can't see that there is private property rights, otherwise we wouldn't be in this situation. It's the same all over.