Gook? LIES.

What really matters are Southern Euro MUDS trying to stake a claim to whiteness and intermix with our Nordicness!

88/14/3.1415926

Gook? LIES.

What really matters are Southern Euro MUDS trying to stake a claim to whiteness and intermix with our Nordicness!

88/14/3.1415926

Nordics are already mixed, they have been for millenniums now.
Southern Eueos are white, and we find the opposite sex of SE more attractive, so stop believing the nordic myth that SE want to mix with the nordic mongrel race.

Fact is I've been in Italy multiple times (Continental, Peninsular and the Isles), watched shows on Italian TV yet I've never seen any Germanic-looking Italian. NEVER. Neither from Lombardy, nor from Tuscany and of course not from Sicily. The only Aryan-looking people appear to be of a local variety and resemble ancient Italics.

When I'm reffering to Germanic looking individuals I refer to:
- pure Aryan types differing from Aryan Italics by a narrower head, straight rather than aquiline nose, greater height and even lighter features. This type is politely called Iron Age Nordic, but it's actually the most faithful historical remnant of the ancient Aryan typology. Most ancient Germanics belonged to this type.
- mixed Aryan-indigenous Nordic types called Falisch under scientific terminology, showing a tendency towards mixed complexion, larger head, bulkier built.

I've seen redheaded carrot-top Germanic looking Sicilians right here in America as well as many blue-eyed platinum blonde Italians that sure looked Germanic by your definitions. But where do the squareheads fit in? You don't even mention squareheadedness which most Germans I know have.

The squareheads you are mentioning are either Alpine (pre-Aryan remnants) or Falisch. Redheadedness among Aryans was absent, so this trait among Italians goes well with a paleolithic old european descent.

I've never seen blue-eyed NATURAL "platinum blond" Italians, but I've seen blue-eyed golden blond Italians of obvious Italic descent. They differ from Nordic Germanics by following traits:
- smaller and rounder head
- average height
- convex nose

Of course these types relate to a common ARYAN source, but the differences are AT LEAST 4,000 years old and pose no identification difficulties.

Your impression is incorrect and heavily Jewed.
1. A Sudanese Nigger is no more Arabic than US Niggs are Englishmen...
2. Racial anthropology is concrete evidence. Check out Coon's book on Racial Types of Europe.
3. DNA analysis provides brute EVIDENCE. Its systematization is a matter of INTERPRETATION. I distrust DNA interpretation by Jews and their Marxist Allies!

This is not my evidence, but the findings of German Anthropolist Dr. Diane Schmidt, these findings were done with moderen techniques used today, not psuedo outdated methods of the kikes and nordicists shit heads.

I distrust women "scientists", let alone "German anthropologists" working under firm Jew supervision. As long as someone loses his job if he expresses anything "inappropriate", I expect nothing really interesting from his behalf.

Techniques are tools. Tools require methods of usage. If the methods are crooked, results are worthless no matter the dexterity with which they are used.

Being "outdated" means nothing more than not being fashionable. So it contains no real judgement of value. Actually, in our case, being out of fashion in a world where fiction poses as truth is an honorable prerequisite. You can only prove our outdated methods are WRONG. Since they relate to objective evidence (human physical types varieties, migrations, HISTORY), you obviously can't do any of that.

You assume my views are "nordicist". As far as I know, Nordicists claimed all knowledge has come from the North, the birthplace of Aryan Race. I don't think knowledge has come from the North, nor do I think Aryans have had Germany as place of birth. Both claims contradict historical evidence and merit no attention. Civilization originated in the Mediterranean Bassin. It was adopted by Greeks via Minoans and transmitted under an ARYAN INTERPRETATION to Romans and Romans to the whole Aryan world. Aryans originated in South Russia and were more than just one linguistic group. They were a homogenous ethnic entity with a very obvious physical type, strong cultural and religious customs that survived the thousand of miles of dispersion. Veddic and Celtic cultures, the most conservative of all, resembled so much they could be regarded as substantially congruent. They called themselves Arya, which had a meaning of "noble", as seen in the self-names of people as geographically distant as Indians, Iranians, Tocharians (arsi) and early Celts, as seen in Ireland's name. This is no "rightwing myth". This is historical fact and I recommend an exercise of history before excreting foul judenscheiss.

Idolatry of method over interpretation reveals someone idiotic enough to believe that a pickax with which someone digs remains writes info about those remains. You are THAT idiot, my friend.

The squareheads you are mentioning are either Alpine (pre-Aryan remnants) or Falisch. Redheadedness among Aryans was absent, so this trait among Italians goes well with a paleolithic old european descent.

I've never seen blue-eyed NATURAL "platinum blond" Italians, but I've seen blue-eyed golden blond Italians of obvious Italic descent. They differ from Nordic Germanics by following traits:
- smaller and rounder head
- average height
- convex nose

So Eric the Red and Frederick Barbarossa weren't Aryans???

Yeah, blue-eyed NATURAL platinum blonde Italians, from Southern Italy too.

Here's another one for you: I live and work in an area with many 100% German-Americans. I would estimate that a third of them have brown or hazel eyes and about a quarter of them have dark brown or black hair. I go to a Farmer's Market sometimes that is run by the Amish and staffed by young women and most of these very pretty girls have brown eyes and dark hair. Are all these Germans more Aryan then blonde Italians?

I distrust women "scientists", let alone "German anthropologists" working under firm Jew supervision. As long as someone loses his job if he expresses anything "inappropriate", I expect nothing really interesting from his behalf.

Techniques are tools. Tools require methods of usage. If the methods are crooked, results are worthless no matter the dexterity with which they are used.

Being "outdated" means nothing more than not being fashionable. So it contains no real judgement of value. Actually, in our case, being out of fashion in a world where fiction poses as truth is an honorable prerequisite. You can only prove our outdated methods are WRONG. Since they relate to objective evidence (human physical types varieties, migrations, HISTORY), you obviously can't do any of that.

You assume my views are "nordicist". As far as I know, Nordicists claimed all knowledge has come from the North, the birthplace of Aryan Race. I don't think knowledge has come from the North, nor do I think Aryans have had Germany as place of birth. Both claims contradict historical evidence and merit no attention. Civilization originated in the Mediterranean Bassin. It was adopted by Greeks via Minoans and transmitted under an ARYAN INTERPRETATION to Romans and Romans to the whole Aryan world. Aryans originated in South Russia and were more than just one linguistic group. They were a homogenous ethnic entity with a very obvious physical type, strong cultural and religious customs that survived the thousand of miles of dispersion. Veddic and Celtic cultures, the most conservative of all, resembled so much they could be regarded as substantially congruent. They called themselves Arya, which had a meaning of "noble", as seen in the self-names of people as geographically distant as Indians, Iranians, Tocharians (arsi) and early Celts, as seen in Ireland's name. This is no "rightwing myth". This is historical fact and I recommend an exercise of history before excreting foul judenscheiss.

Idolatry of method over interpretation reveals someone idiotic enough to believe that a pickax with which someone digs remains writes info about those remains. You are THAT idiot, my friend.

No your the idiot, you don't believe modern scientific data, because it proves the mythical writings of the past by nordic imbiciles is just BS.
tODAYS DNA IS SO ACCURATE, THAT IT CAN SEND A MAN TO PRISON FOR MURDER.

you don't believe todays scientific data but believe the bullshit of psuedo historians like Kemp, McCullouch etc.

I am a white man and a christian not a jew idiot, stop all this nordicist/jew BS, in all the countrys of Europe their are some indigenous people who are questionable, about their racial makeup.

Thier is no scientific proof about a pure white, that is all jew/nordicist BS.

If thier are pure whites? then it must be me, with my light brown hair, blue eyes and fair skin.

Their are no Aryans today, Aryans were an ancient tribe and most mixed with other races.

You are either white, Asian, negro etc, so stop using the jew/nordicist label about Aryans.

Their are no Aryans today, Aryans were an ancient tribe and most mixed with other races.

You are either white, Asian, negro etc, so stop using the jew/nordicist label about Aryans.

More Southern Euro Mud LIES (SEML).

Go back to Carthage!

More Southern Euro Mud LIES (SEML).

Go back to Carthage!

Go back to mongolia you mongoloid mongrel!

You are too stupid to understand: DNA is objective, but its interpretation is subjective.

DNA is objective, but its interpretation is subjective.

Care to explain that?

You are too stupid to understand: DNA is objective, but its interpretation is subjective.

Your a fuckin moron living in your own mythical world, and cannot accept reality.

Your going to tell science that they are all wrong, because you read literatiure by nordicisit sociallly dysfunctional parasites like Kemp, EARLSON, McCullouch who are nothing but the arm pit of the white race, if these imbiciles are white.