The nail in the cof...
 
Notifications
Clear all

The nail in the coffin to ZOG's version of 9-11

67 Posts
17 Users
0 Reactions
2,954 Views
(@furcht)
Posts: 162
Estimable Member
 

I am a White Racialist and im sorry these videos and yes I have given them a chance do not convince me that somehow they were demolished. It is very feasable that arabs who are sick of American Foreign Policy did this. When people talk about nonsense about Silverstein getting buckou insurance bucks he is basically screwing over fellow kike-money men. We give this "ZOG" too much credit, it can barely function in Iraq yet super secret mossad agents were able to go about this with ZERO whistleblowers, nothing???!!! sept internet speculators, and lets not forget that the contractors who built these buildings were MAFIA-puppets and sure the hell (Like jews) and didn't build these buildings on par per say blueprints. But if I am wrong and somehow that it is proven without a doubt then i admit it.


 
Posted : 20/03/2006 1:04 am
Agis
 Agis
(@agis)
Posts: 552
Prominent Member
 

They will put the blame on Bush and some nebulous conspiracy around him. ... The media will spit out the Jew line, whatever it is]I agree with this assessment. Bush & Co., wasps, republicans, etc. are going to be the Oswald, McVeys. All the facts the media jews have covered up can be 'discovered' in an instant and mixed with other fabrications. Underdog jew reporters a la Watergate will release new partial facts. Maybe they'll have a show trial like Nuremburg and hang fifty 'traitors' at a drop? All the while pandering to the mud masses as the champions of true democracy, as leaders of the 'oppositional' Democratic party.

On the other hand any type of 'inner party' falling out would seriously damage their credability with whites, i.e. the only people who matter. I'm guessing 40% wouldn't buy the new 'going line' or anything else the government does. There would be a massive loss in confidence and lots of cynicism and wide spread disbelief. This could have far-reaching and unexpected negative consequences for them. The conservative approach would be to 'hold the line' despite any and all evidence. So far they have been quite successful using this strategy. They have passed the most dangerous period of evaluation and no one of importance has broken rank. The internet is chipping away but 10-20 years is a lot of time to work with.


.
.
CREATIVITY NOW! http://tinyurl.com/6buj85

 
Posted : 20/03/2006 3:26 am
karakazov
(@karakazov)
Posts: 39
Eminent Member
 

I agree with this assessment. Bush & Co., wasps, republicans, etc. are going to be the Oswald, McVeys. All the facts the media jews have covered up can be 'discovered' in an instant and mixed with other fabrications. Underdog jew reporters a la Watergate will release new partial facts. Maybe they'll have a show trial like Nuremburg and hang fifty 'traitors' at a drop? All the while pandering to the mud masses as the champions of true democracy, as leaders of the 'oppositional' Democratic party.

On the other hand any type of 'inner party' falling out would seriously damage their credability with whites, i.e. the only people who matter. I'm guessing 40% wouldn't buy the new 'going line' or anything else the government does. There would be a massive loss in confidence and lots of cynicism and wide spread disbelief. This could have far-reaching and unexpected negative consequences for them. The conservative approach would be to 'hold the line' despite any and all evidence. So far they have been quite successful using this strategy. They have passed the most dangerous period of evaluation and no one of importance has broken rank. The internet is chipping away but 10-20 years is a lot of time to work with.

Yes, I hope it works out like this, to our not their benefit.


Rockwell, Oliver, Pierce, Ford, Butz, MacDonald, Occidental Quarterly, Hitler

 
Posted : 20/03/2006 7:02 am
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
 

The argument for a jew/traitor 9-11 is already -- even now, before all the scientific evidence is in -- so overwhelming to an intelligent, rational man, that it is functioning as a spotlight in the dark, lighting up for all to see: the enemies among us.

If, having just, for instance, listened to Professor Steven Jones' speech, an otherwise intelligent man continues to profess disbelief in "the conspiracy theory," continues to profess belief in the Muslims-did-it government line -- then I think it rational to assume that that man is either a jew or fed enemy or a white traitor.

If the man is not intelligent, then he may be too stupid to see the knife at his throat and we should merely count him among the white lemmings.

9-11 is the torch that exposes the enemy -- not just at the perpetrator level -- but the enemy among us.

It may be wise now to pause and check who -- for instance here at VNN -- continues to profess the government line: and count him with the enemy.


 
Posted : 20/03/2006 7:41 am
(@contumacyman)
Posts: 221
Reputable Member
 

Furcht wrote:

"=It is very feasable that arabs who are sick of American Foreign Policy did this."

By, "...did this", I assume you mean causing the collapse of the three WTC buildings, right? Your getting ahead of yourself, aren't you? Instead of charging ahead to identify "who" (arabs?, jews?, illuminati?), first get a clear understanding of "what" (causing 3 high-rise office buildings to collapse in a free-fall controlled demolition-like style).

Forget the consequences, focus on the technology of trying to make any high-rise building collapse that way. If you can come up with a way mere fires (WTC 7) can bring it about, or, localized fires plus a plane impact (N & S towers), then lay it out for the rest of us non-believers here and we will listen.
A step-by-step analysis, absent any "once out of the boiling water"-type jumps to fantasy, would be most convincing.

If you are logical, since you are a WN, then I assume so, then you can follow this very easily. First, you do see that, absent any other consequential considerations, a controlled demolition is ONE WAY that these three buildings could have been brought down that way. Right? And you can go through the technical steps, detail by detail, as to how this could be done (absent any political consequences). Second. is there any OTHER way to bring those 3 building down in that fashion, where you can also go through the technical steps detail-by-detail? If so, please do.

If you finally see you cannot actually describe the technology of any alternate method (as you surely CAN with controlled demolition), then, by the process of effective elimination, you are left with only controlled demolition. The consequences of that realizaton are what most of us wanted to avoid early on (corrupt government, corrupt media, corrupt jews, corrupt insurance, etc.), but, a grown man doesn't hide from the harsh realities that a technologal analysis demands.

You don't have to "believe" that these movies "prove" anything. You can hold onto to your natual skepticism - but, can you work out, for us or for yourself, the details of any alternate method to bring down those buildings that way (freefall, contained footprint, etc.)?

Forget about the "who", and focus on the "what" and "how".

I'll be watching for your technical response concerning the "fire and pancake" collapse fantasy.

Contumacyman


 
Posted : 20/03/2006 8:29 am
erich1776
(@erich1776)
Posts: 248
Reputable Member
 

iamthewitness.com called kaminski a jew with a jewish girlfriend.

Janusz Kaminski is speilberg's cinematographer and he's a kike.

You know, as long as this guy points towards satanic jews, that's fine by me. He even says that Bush was probably not let in on it cause he's so fucking stupid.

He does however say rumsfeld pulls the strings, which is bullshit, cause he's a puppet himself.


 
Posted : 20/03/2006 8:37 am
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
 

iamthewitness.com called kaminski a jew with a jewish girlfriend.

Janusz Kaminski is speilberg's cinematographer and he's a kike.

You know, as long as this guy points towards satanic jews, that's fine by me. He even says that Bush was probably not let in on it cause he's so fucking stupid.

He does however say rumsfeld pulls the strings, which is bullshit, cause he's a puppet himself.

Actually, the more of Kaminski's essays I read, the more kikish he becomes. Although, very recently, he has started to name the jew, he still says things like when the world turns against white Americans and Europeans, we will be getting what we deserve -- because of all our past sins against the world.

Still, I like that he's now naming the jew and helping to reveal 9-11 and exposing the war on Iraq and Iran and warning us of the world tyranny.

So it's a lot of good intermingled with some poisonous jew crap.


 
Posted : 20/03/2006 10:01 pm
(@bernie)
Posts: 414
Reputable Member
 

Since the insurer holders of the Twin Towers-7 were mostly from Europe, I wonder if they’ll pursue the 911 as an inside job, or a Jewish lighting. The Jews do repeat they're trickery over and over as long as the goy’s lick they're boots, which in Weimar Germany, the Nazi put a halt of the “Jewish lighting” which nearly bankrupt the insurance industry.

The Insurance has been settled and Silverstein won. There were well over a dozen mostly European Insurers involved. These behave much as a herd of Cattle. Seriously, can you imagine one of the executives daring to speak up, saying he suspects something jewishly unkosher brought down the buildings?

3,000 people killed in broad daylight and 'he's gonna challenge them?

They may privately call 911 a 'jewish stocktake'. They know the thieving conniving jew has been swindling insurers for years. In Australia back in 1994, Australia's richest man (not a Jew) sells an old broken down commercial building in Sydney to a high profile stockbroker jew for $8Million.

Here is a cautionery tale:

This jew gets in touch with another jew who owns an Insurance Company who agrees to insure it for a quick $58Million. Think about THAT, say your old Chevrolet is valued at $8,000, try and get an Insurer to insure it for $58,000.00!!

Suprise!!!! On CHRISTMAS EVE 1994, the old Sydney building suddenly burns down to the ground.

But the stockbroker Jew had earlier arranged to take 'insurance' of another kind: He gets two high profile GOYS involved, a corporation was set up and shares in the 'Venture' were allocated. The two Goys were a) A Senior Minister in the Australian Government and b) a very senior, Nationally famous business executive.

The Insurance claim is settled immediately in full. Questions are asked, but because of the JEWS involved they were 'soft' questions. Can't be an anti-semite, can we? The 50 year old stockbroker jew is a closet homosexual and likes lavishing gifts on fit young men and hanging out with them.

He takes his young male 'Chaufeur' to Switzerland to deposit the ill gotten gains. Australian regulatory authorities are stymied by the Swiss bank secrecy provisions and lose the scent.

Chaufeur has a girlfriend who is an attractive up and coming model. HER girlfriend, discovers the old jew in bed with him, 'en flagrante', one morning and squawks. Chaufeur's girlfriend is pissed at this and threatens to SING to the authorities because he had earlier told her what actually went down in Switzerland.

That was a bad move.

One morning she is found dead at the bottom of a lovers leap on Sydney Harbour. Inquest ruled it a suicide, her friends and family are pissed and never quit.

But wait, there is a God.

Ten years pass. Australian finacial regulators get a call from the Swiss Police.

It turns out the Swiss Bank in which the ill gotten gains had been deposited was actually an ISRAELI Bank with a Swiss Branch office. Guess that means lots of jews work in the Bank, huh?

The Swiss Police report that some low, dirty rotten, SCOUNDREL had accessed accounts of several Australian Citizens and MILLIONS had been filched. The culprit got off scott free to you-know-where shitty little country.

Suddenly, dark public suspicion is focused on the 2 Jews and the 2 Goys. There comes a witness claiming that he heard and saw two men arguing loudly with the Chauffeur's Girlfriend and hear her scream as she went off the cliff.

Sydney University Biomechanics experts conduct experiments at the Cliff site concluding that 'not even a well trained Olympic Athlete could launch herself so far horizontally as to finish up on the spot where the body was found'. It is now deemed a murder.

Conclusion:

In the ten years that passed these two jews became notorious for other, FAR LARGER swindles. The stockbroker jew was jailed on another matter and then mysteriously committed 'suicide'. There are those here who suspect he was such an embarrasement to the Australian Jewish community that he may have had some assistance in his 'suicide'.

The insurance jew is in jail for seven years, again for another matter, but he will never be permitted to operate a business in Australia when he gets out.

Jews are natural predators, very clever and very capable of taking a big risk. That's why I believe 911 was a hoax, at the core of this hoax was the cheapest way to demolish the WTC and make a few INSURANCE shekels for the jews who had aquired it only a few months earlier. Everything else follows from that assumption. Trust me, I'm right about that.

Anyone who believes 2 Planes alone brought down those 7 buildings needs to have their head examined.


 
Posted : 20/03/2006 10:24 pm
(@contumacyman)
Posts: 221
Reputable Member
 

Bernie,

We must have a cosmic mind-meld because "insurance fraud" hit me in the face like an ugly slap right after I saw the 2nd building collapse. Of course, I now suspect a much wider conspiracy, involving the war drums, but, the initial scent-of-crime has to be plain ole' time-honored INSURANCE FRAUD. That is why I am flabbergasted that the claims adjusters for the insurance company didn't sniff out the CRIME OF THE CENTURY and blow the whole thing out of the water. That still has me befuddled.

Did you suspect insurance fraud right afet the collapse, like I did? I ask because I couldn't find anybody else on that day to "even think such a thing". Even the so-called patriot short wave crowd (such as Brent Johnson and Pastor Pete Peters) swallowed the government's "magic pancake's" phenomenum whole hog.

Tell us, Bernie - I respect your perception and analysis - how is this all going to work out? Go out on a limb, if you will, because I get mind-numbed when I think of the implications.

Contumacyman


 
Posted : 21/03/2006 12:42 am
erich1776
(@erich1776)
Posts: 248
Reputable Member
 

I think the kike picked German insurers on purpose so that if they try anything, they are automatically called nazis.

A german company has recovered data from computers at ground zero pointing to funny business and insider trading on 911.


 
Posted : 21/03/2006 8:42 am
(@hate-dept)
Posts: 898
Prominent Member
 

Visitors to this forum:

The conspiracist views of the September 11th World Trade Center tragedy which are expressed here are not necessarily the views of VNN nor are they necessarily the views of white nationalists in general.


 
Posted : 21/03/2006 8:07 pm
erich1776
(@erich1776)
Posts: 248
Reputable Member
 

Visitors to this forum:

The conspiracist views of the September 11th World Trade Center tragedy which are expressed here are not necessarily the views of VNN nor are they necessarily the views of white nationalists in general.

Actually KIKE, this IS the official view of VNN.

Alex Linder

WTC, packed with explosives, blown to smithereens

No rational man can doubt that the WTC buildings were blown up after watching this video. It's about an hour.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psP_9RE0V2I&eurl=


 
Posted : 21/03/2006 8:11 pm
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
 

Visitors to this forum:

The conspiracist views of the September 11th World Trade Center tragedy which are expressed here are not necessarily the views of VNN nor are they necessarily the views of white nationalists in general.

The conspiracist views will likely become the view of all true Americans and White Nationalists in the near future -- because those views appear to be the truth. And because they are becoming MAINSTREAM.


 
Posted : 21/03/2006 8:12 pm
Action Alert
(@action-alert)
Posts: 1965
Noble Member
 


..............................


 
Posted : 21/03/2006 8:12 pm
erich1776
(@erich1776)
Posts: 248
Reputable Member
 

Babylonian Talmud.


 
Posted : 21/03/2006 8:16 pm
Page 4 / 5
Share: