The Strange Definition of "Holocaust Survivor"

Not only is the "official Holocaust narrative" ridiculous (where were the many tons of human ash?) [1], but so is the definition of "Holocaust survivor": it leaves lots of wiggle room. Nearly anyone can be a "Holocaust survivor." Even if you never set foot in Hitler's Third Reich, you could still be a "Holocaust survivor" and therefore collect money from somebody, somewhere.

A definition of the term "Holocaust survivor" according to AMCHA, Jerusalem, 1997 [2] :

"A Holocaust survivor will be defined as any Jew who lived in a country at the time when it was:

-- under Nazi regime
-- under Nazi occupation
-- under regime of Nazi collaborators as well as any Jew who fleed (sic) due to the above regime or occupation."

So, in other words, if you lived in Spain or Italy in 1939 and you were a Jew but you were never arrested or jailed, and you fled to America in that same year, you are still a "Holocaust survivor"; this is a very questionable definition of "Holocaust survivor." You never even set foot in the Third Reich.

Also, consider the footnote in that webpage (see link above): "Most amazingly, Jews who left Europe (i.e., Germany) in 1933 or 1934 for America and elsewhere, and who lived a cushy life while the war raged in Europe, are considered "Holocaust survivors." (Note: that was long before the Holocaust supposedly began in 1940).

.

[1] had the Holocaust occurred as the Jews claim, there would have been huge piles of human ash all around the Auschwitz camp -- literally tons and tons of it. It would have required large trucks to regularly load and remove the ash because the water table around Auschwitz was so close to the earth's surface that burying it would have been impossible. Yet no Red Cross official, nor anybody else, ever reported seeing such ash.

[2] "the AMCHA organization is an Israeli psychological and social support group for Holocaust survivors"

-------------------------