The Truth of Evolut...
 
Notifications
Clear all

The Truth of Evolution: in which Donger attempts to unbrainwash Devere

125 Posts
22 Users
0 Reactions
5,052 Views
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

The biggest problem with BOTH the evolutionary theory and the creationist theory, is that people try to make one or the other paramount and exclusive.

In fact, BOTH systems are complimentary. God created the Universe and let it evolve. What's so difficult about understanding this?

Nicely stated.


 
Posted : 30/10/2006 7:19 am
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Devere, I respect your posts as they are always well thought out, but kindly give this one moment of consideration:

If we all came from Africa and evolved from apes to niggers to human then aren't we related to niggers and other muds ?

And why didn't those muds and niggers evolve ?

.

To specifically answer one of your questions which I didn't quite answer. Yes, we are distantly related to niggers (sorry to say) and more closely related to all mixed races.


 
Posted : 30/10/2006 7:20 am
(@c-stoff)
Posts: 305
Reputable Member
 

Here is an article I found, I'm not a big fan of the site it comes from (nor am I a proponent of the "et" thing) but the parts about domesticated grains and animals is pretty interesting.

"Evidence for creation by outside intervention"

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/etcreation.html

.


 
Posted : 30/10/2006 8:07 am
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Here is an article I found, I'm not a big fan of the site it comes from (nor am I a proponent of the "et" thing) but the parts about domesticated grains and animals is pretty interesting.

"Evidence for creation by outside intervention"

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/etcreation.html

.

Just glancing through your article -- it looks like pseudo-science to me (scientific sounding but not being). I'll look more closely at it later when I get the chance.


 
Posted : 30/10/2006 8:51 am
(@c-stoff)
Posts: 305
Reputable Member
 

Just glancing through your article -- it looks like pseudo-science to me (scientific sounding but not being). I'll look more closely at it later when I get the chance.

Nexus does print alot of those types (pseudo science and just plain horsehockey) of articles but the bits about plant and animal domestication have some interesting assertions.

.


 
Posted : 30/10/2006 8:55 am
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

To specifically answer one of your questions which I didn't quite answer. Yes, we are distantly related to niggers (sorry to say) and more closely related to all mixed races.

To elaborate a bit on our relationship with niggers. In my opinion, the White race and the negroid race are NOT two separate races. We are different SPECIES. A race is a variety within one species. It is a euphemism to call the White race and niggers two different varieties of the same species -- a euphemism which has increased the race-mixing between the two species and, thereby, significantly injured White genetics. Of course, this is the reason for the euphemism.

The differences between the two species are many and large, starting with the large differences in intelligence, the single-most marker trait of human beings. Niggers 55 to 70 average IQ in the nigger's natural pure form, the African nigger]common ancestor. I don't think scientists have exactly figured out who that common ancestor is. I think (I'm not an expert in this subject so keep that in mind) that common ancestor is probably homo erectus. In fact, I believe the nigger is simply a mix of homo erectus and modern man, rather than a step up in evolution per se -- but maybe it amounts to the same thing as a step or half step up.

Not that long ago -- I think it was as recent as only four or five million years ago -- humanish creatures and chimpanzees shared a common ancestor. My guess is that the nigger is genetically more closely related to the chimpanzee (or the ancestor of the chimpanzee) than we are. And that this will be genetically proven, if it hasn't been already.

Chimpanzees and humans share 98% (I think it is) of the same genetics. That 2% makes a lot of difference, does it not? Keep that in mind the next time you hear a jew or multi-racialist say that we're all one race, the human race, because our genetics are over 99% the same. In genetics, small differences are HUGE. Humans, for instance, share 40% (I think it is) of the same genetics with DANDELIONS!!!


 
Posted : 30/10/2006 9:19 am
(@alexander)
Posts: 34
Eminent Member
 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vestigial_organs


 
Posted : 30/10/2006 9:26 am
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vestigial_organs

Vestigial Structures. Thanks. Helpful addition to the thread.


 
Posted : 30/10/2006 9:45 am
elbwgreez
(@elbwgreez)
Posts: 332
Reputable Member
 

To specifically answer one of your questions which I didn't quite answer. Yes, we are distantly related to niggers (sorry to say) and more closely related to all mixed races.

I don't see why anyone gives a damn that we evolved from niggers (the missing link). It's the same as saying we evolved from apes, lizards, or amoeba. The idea doesn't sicken me at all. In fact it makes proud of my distant ancestors who rose from the sludge and fought and suffered to become the greatest, most brilliant creatures the world has ever known. The important thing is we're human (i.e. White) now and must prevent ourselves from devolving into apes by breeding with them.


 
Posted : 30/10/2006 11:32 am
Joseph
(@joseph)
Posts: 451
Honorable Member
 

Questions for evolutionists:

Millions of men. Millions of monkeys. Millions of bones. Why the missing links? Where did the millions of subspecies go?

Why does every mammal have paired limbs, eyes, nostrils, etc?

Why no 6-legged mammals?

Why were so many dinosaur bones fossilized millions of years ago, but no evidence of a single White man exists that is older than even 100,000 years?


Vote from the rooftops

 
Posted : 30/10/2006 1:32 pm
(@alexander)
Posts: 34
Eminent Member
 

Questions for Creationists:

Why do whales have leg bones?

Why do blind mole rats have eyes?

Who created everything? If god, who created god? Also, what is god made of? Uranium? Dark matter? Magical pixie dust?


 
Posted : 30/10/2006 2:05 pm
Joseph
(@joseph)
Posts: 451
Honorable Member
 

I am not a creationist, but my answer is - I don't know.


Vote from the rooftops

 
Posted : 30/10/2006 2:15 pm
(@c-stoff)
Posts: 305
Reputable Member
 

Questions for Creationists:

Why do whales have leg bones?

Why do blind mole rats have eyes?

Who created everything? If god, who created god? Also, what is god made of? Uranium? Dark matter? Magical pixie dust?

Um, excuse me Mr. science but everyone knows that God is made out of Uranium mixed with magical pixie dust.

And if it's dark, it don't matter :) :)

.


 
Posted : 30/10/2006 2:17 pm
(@donger)
Posts: 234
Reputable Member
 

Questions for Creationists:

Why do whales have leg bones?

Some random unknown process

with a seemingly bottomless power supply

communicated worldwide and underneath the ocean

with mulitple invisibles message that only reached by whales

to break and chisel away and reconnect the bones of their former legs

tear and reattached and perfectly fit their former legs muscles and skin

and this process occured by the random chance of molecules interacting

and of course killed no whales nor caused them any pain while performing

this unknown species wide surgery.

Why do blind mole rats have eyes?

To get to the other side? See above.

Who created everything? If god, who created god? Also, what is god made of? Uranium? Dark matter? Magical pixie dust?

Cockroaches do not know what insecticide is made of nor who created it. But it sure kills them.

===

Yes the possiblity of being we know nothing about is really out of the question. :rolleyes:


The Words of the Prophet Linder
Banning opposition Manly Discussions Jews Name the Jews
Holocaust Frequently Asked Question

 
Posted : 30/10/2006 2:24 pm
banjo_billy
(@banjo_billy)
Posts: 858
Noble Member
 

The "Africa seedland" theory is actually unproven.

The Africa origin is more Jewish-Commie bullstuff designed to pull down whites to a lower level both in our own eyes and in the eyes of the mud races. It's a form of psychological warfare perpetrate against us.

White people didn't evolve from Negroids. The so-called "proof" is a few tiny fragments of monkey bones. Have you ever seen the schematic diagrams of the so-called "missing links"? There is like one small piece of some sort of a skull about the size of a fifty cent piece around which the anthropolgists draw in all the missing pieces -- it's a work of anthropoligical imaginary design work. Then maybe a tiny sliver of foot bone around which they draw in an entire skeleton. What kind of "proof" is that unless you are a stage magician proving that you can saw a woman in half and then put the pieces back together? It works on an entertainment stage and it works as Jewish science at its best -- bullshit on a grand scale.


A Nigger in the White House in MP3 audio
"The Sumerian Swindle"
Swindling the Goyim: The Basic Swindle

 
Posted : 30/10/2006 5:55 pm
Page 5 / 9
Share: