To elaborate a bit on our relationship with niggers. In my opinion, the White race and the negroid race are NOT two separate races. We are different SPECIES.

Actually, the impression is being given to the people of the world that everybody evolved from a primordial Negro. But the evolutionary tree has many branches. We did not evolve from negroes. Ours is a different branch of the Tree of Life. The Light of Intelligence was given to us because of our superior racial stock which was created as a result of our spiritual virtue.

If we were having a discussion 5,000 years ago, the argument for the existence for God would include thunder and the trees. 200 years ago (when we understood more about thunder and trees), God was in the sky. Now that man has ventured into the skies, God went far out into space, and now in another dimension altogether.

What was the highest and most powerful things to ancient man, and what was the highest and most powerful things to recent man, and what is the highest and most wonderful things to modern man, are all still the highest and most powerful and wonderful things. This has not changed at all. That Man finds from one age to the next ever more higher and more powerful and more wonderful things in this incredible Universe, does not mean that God does not exist simply because Man did not find Him in the things and in the places that Man looked for Him. This is because you will not find God in things. He is here and He is there. But you will not be able to grasp him with your hands. But you can perceive Him with your Heart and Inner Eye.

Reverence for all of Creation guided ancient Man. Wonder at all of Creation guided recent Man. But what will guide Modern Man who fancies himself knowledgeable and wise? Jesus said it best: "The kingdom of God is within thee... Look and it shall be revealed unto you.... Seek and ye shall find.... Knock and it shall be opened unto you."

You cannot find a Treasure unless you seek for it. You can journey into distant space looking for stars and planets or into sub-atomic space looking for neutrinos, but what you will find are things. But if you are seeking God, He is both within you and without you waiting to answer your inquiry. It's a mystery but not one that is so very difficult to solve ... if you try.

I read this in a history book, so maybe it isn't true, BUT, they said that Cortez brought about 30 large well-bread battle horses with him in 1530, but that there were NO HORSES in the americas at that time. 250 years later, those 30 arabian giant well-bread mounts had "evolved" (more like "devolved") into the herds of paints that roamed the plains of the americas. Small, wiry, with a fierce bite, these descendants of the arabian horses were all that were found as white men pushed west. Still the same species, but definitely not evolving.

The chinese have a legend, which a mainland defector revealed to me many years ago. God's first attempt to create man produced the negro race, and, god said, "too well done". His second attempt produced the white race, and god said, "not done enough". Then god's final attempt produced the yellow race (chinese), and god said, "JUST RIGHT!".

I still say that somehow, somewhere,an intelligence of some kind was involved in creating the DNA sequences that produces all these variations of life forms. Species don't have the capacity to radically change their fundamental traits. The examples usually cited by evolutionists are small and insignificant, and can be interpretted as environmental variations - like the mating of the donkey with a mare produces a mule, which is not likely to be fertile. I have read that the mating of caucasians with some of the tribes of aborigones (in australia) produced occasional infertile crossbreads.

The Africa origin is more Jewish-Commie bullstuff designed to pull down whites to a lower level both in our own eyes and in the eyes of the mud races. It's a form of psychological warfare perpetrate against us.

White people didn't evolve from Negroids. The so-called "proof" is a few tiny fragments of monkey bones. Have you ever seen the schematic diagrams of the so-called "missing links"? There is like one small piece of some sort of a skull about the size of a fifty cent piece around which the anthropolgists draw in all the missing pieces -- it's a work of anthropoligical imaginary design work. Then maybe a tiny sliver of foot bone around which they draw in an entire skeleton. What kind of "proof" is that unless you are a stage magician proving that you can saw a woman in half and then put the pieces back together? It works on an entertainment stage and it works as Jewish science at its best -- bullshit on a grand scale.

Jews certainly have gone apeshit over the idea (as have the blacks themselves, who hardly understand it) but it wasn't Jews who came up with the idea of the "African Eve"--it was British goyim scientists.

What I can add to the discussion of this "African Eve" hypothesis (and it's a hypothesis, not a theory--theories have substantial evidence behind them. When lay people say "it's only a theory," they're referring to HYPOTHESES. But I disgress) is that the number of calculations the computer was having to do was something like 10 to the 45th power--and it never got close, needless to say. About half of the phylogeny trees showed human origins in central or south-central Asia, the other half suggested Africa. The scientists went with Africa, since that was the source of the best-known human fossils at the time (mid-1980s). Since 2000 all sorts of new, advanced human fossils have been popping up in extreme southeastern Europe and west Asia, though.

Evolution is a fact, programed into the DNA of every living being by a higher intelligence.

Niggers were created separately from Whites. The bones they are finding in Africa have NO relation to the fossils found in Asia and Europe. Lucy and other fossils are the ancestors of the NIGGERS, not Europeans.

Correction: the authors of the original Out of Africa paper were Americans, not British. One of the authors was named Cann--I was thinking that he was a British scientist I know of. They're not the same person.

Correction: the authors of the original Out of Africa paper were Americans, not British. One of the authors was named Cann--I was thinking that he was a British scientist I know of. They're not the same person.

Cann (Kahan, Cohen) is a Jewish name.

Correction: the authors of the original Out of Africa paper were Americans, not British. One of the authors was named Cann--I was thinking that he was a British scientist I know of. They're not the same person.

The Lucy -type(australopithecus) fossils are old enough that they most likely WERE a common ancestor for all humanoid species.
Since the African climate was much more forgiving during the ice ages, niggers were able to survive without going through the complex changes that Europeans and Asians needed to survive( ie, bigger brain, social skills).

The skeleton from a "modern" African pygmy(Ituri) could easily be mistaken for one of the later australopithecine forms. Bone proportion and size are quite similar.

Evolution is a fact, programed into the DNA of every living being by a higher intelligence.

Niggers were created separately from Whites. The bones they are finding in Africa have NO relation to the fossils found in Asia and Europe. Lucy and other fossils are the ancestors of the NIGGERS, not Europeans.

Another example of the evolutionist's incoherence. Lucy has been long revealed a hoax. Nevertheless, THEORY adherents cling to their missing link like jews to soap and lampshades.

Evolution is a fact the same way that creationism is a fact. The fact being that many species DO exist proves that they somehow came to exist. Neither religion (yes, they are both religious points of view) offers any more science. Creationism cannot tell us how god created all the critters nor can evolution tell us the mechanics of speciation. Conclusion? Neither religion is worth shit.

You'd think the striking similarities between racial equality, holocaustism and evolutionism wouldn't be lost on WN. They are all obvious lies propagated by the judeosphere.

Another example of the evolutionist's incoherence. Lucy has been long revealed a hoax. Nevertheless, THEORY adherents cling to their missing link like jews to soap and lampshades.

I don't know whether or not Lucy has been proven a hoax (and you probably don't know either) -- I haven't studied the latest on her. However, the SCIENTIFIC theory of evolution does not rest on Lucy. Lucy could be a total hoax -- and have ABSOLUTELY NO IMPACT on Darwin's long lifetime of careful research (which you apparently know next to nothing about, Joseph).

Evolution is a fact the same way that creationism is a fact. The fact being that many species DO exist proves that they somehow came to exist. Neither religion (yes, they are both religious points of view) offers any more science. Creationism cannot tell us how god created all the critters nor can evolution tell us the mechanics of speciation. Conclusion? Neither religion is worth shit.

You'd think the striking similarities between racial equality, holocaustism and evolutionism wouldn't be lost on WN. They are all obvious lies propagated by the judeosphere.

You are just plain wrong, Joseph. Nor is your stance particularly rational in view even of this thread. I think the "evolutionists" have given sufficient explanations and answers here to erase your skepticism. And yet you persist with your skepticism -- your position hasn't changed one iota. That's not rational.

...nor can evolution tell us the mechanics of speciation.

You have it exactly wrong. The mechanics of speciation is exactly what Charles Darwin (with his theory and proof of natural selection) along with Gregor Mendel (the discoverer of the the way heredity operates) supplied. Francis Crick and James Watson's addition of the discovery of the DNA double helix plus recent findings in the science of genetics further describe the mechanics behind the scientific theory of evolution.

Science is the opposite of religion -- in that scientific theories are premised on actual objective observation. Science CAN be monkeyed around with, so to speak -- lied about -- and the jews, with their sole priority of world power and dominance have done that, as we know. The Christian Church has also monkeyed around with the truth of science (argued strenuously against science for centuries). Its agenda and concerns are the same today as it was when it disputed Galileo's discovery -- which was based on careful observation using brand new technology (Galileo invented the telescope) -- that the earth and other planets travelled around the sun, not vice versa. The Church was concerned that its mystical explanations for physical reality would lose credibility and so they'd lose adherents. (Unfortunately, they didn't lose adherents and so have been able to continue perpetrating their real hoax on the Aryan race.)

But have no fear, Joseph (a quintessentially Christian name you've chosen there -- is that a coincidence?). As Banjo Billy pointed out -- and as I pointed out -- you can believe in God and still accept the reality of evolution. You may have to give up, however, many literal Biblical explanations for physical reality -- but that's okay -- doing so will bring you closer to the truth. And the truth is what we want to found our world-view on.

Darwin, Mendel, and Crick and Watson were/are not jews. Their motivation was Truth. Objective Truth is a definitionally Aryan quest.

You're allowing the anti-scientific, anti-truth Christian propaganda and flack to blind you to Aryan truth. Christianity and Christian mystecism ARE jewish, fundamentally. Science (including the theory of evolution) is NOT jewish. Science was and could only have been created by the Aryan race. Evolution is one of the pillars of science -- and it is a sturdy pillar.

Aryans must take a rational stance -- in the face of jew and religious distortions. Clear your eyes.

Study the subject before you make your mystical pronouncements.

Start by reading Darwin's Origin of Species. Even though it is an early work in this field, it is THE seminal work -- and his fundamental findings have NOT been disproved. It is very clearly written. You'll learn a lot from it. And you'll come to appreciate Darwin's integrity and thoroughness as a scientist.

Darwin, Mendel, and Crick and Watson are not mystics and evolution is no religion.

I think what most troubles Christians about evolution is the following:

If human beings descended from the animal world, then human beings are not special, are not special creations by God. And how can human beings have immortal souls, if they are not special creations of God?

And here's where Christianity makes its mistake. It is possible that human beings have immortal souls, even if the human body evolved from less intelligent apes. After all, the human body may be physical vessels that we, as immortal souls, occupy during this lifetime. This is, in fact, the ancient Aryan belief. Such a reality, if it is one, would allow for reincarnation and life beyond the physical realm. This concept is part of at least two of the Aryan "religions": Hinduism and Buddhism.

The scientific theory of evolution does NOT contradict the ARYAN religions -- though it may weaken the more literal jewish-christian-islamic religions. But don't we WANT them weakened?

Small correction, Francis Crick, not Click.

regards

Small correction, Francis Crick, not Click.

regards

That's right. Thanks.

Another example of the evolutionist's incoherence. Lucy has been long revealed a hoax. Nevertheless, THEORY adherents cling to their missing link like jews to soap and lampshades.

You'd think the striking similarities between racial equality, holocaustism and evolutionism wouldn't be lost on WN. They are all obvious lies propagated by the judeosphere.

I don't see the connection between the first two and the last. If anything, the findings of evolution have been utterly twisted by the judeosphere. Jews love evolution because they hate Christians, and knocking out one of Christianity's cherished stories makes them giddy. But they've piled their own offal on top of evolution--particularly racial equality. If anything, evolution would not support racial sameness, but it was Jews starting with Boas and Montagnu that made any approaching of this subject verboten. Coon was one of the last scientists (1960s) to even deal with racial differences.

As for Lucy...no, that fossil has NEVER been revealed as a hoax, although you may well find stories about its finders hoaxing it on batshit insane Creationist web sites. What Lucy HAS been subjected to is differences in interpretation--common interpretation says she was a ground-dwelling biped, but minority opinion (not "minority" as in spic, etc.!) thinks she was a tree-dwelling ape.

Devere, your condescension is uncalled for and, I thought, beneath you. Some debating skills there. Really impressed me so far.

My kike-worshipping moron of a father named me Joseph. Fuck him. Fuck Jesus Christ. And fuck you if you don't like it. We live in the judeosphere, deal with it.

If you are unable to accept the fact that Lucy has nothing to do whatsoever with the existence of White men, that's fine. You can have the single example of an ancient chimp skeleton. Yay!

Does anyone here deny that Piltdown man is hoax too?

Devere, where are the fossil records of the millions of variant critters between ape and White man? Why do they not exist? Answer that one simple question satisfactorily, and I'll come over to evolutionism. Hal-ay-jew-ya! Praise Darwin!