The Truth of Evolut...
 
Notifications
Clear all

The Truth of Evolution: in which Donger attempts to unbrainwash Devere

125 Posts
22 Users
0 Reactions
5,159 Views
(@respect-vanpatten)
Posts: 81
Trusted Member
 

Devere, your condescension is uncalled for and, I thought, beneath you. Some debating skills there. Really impressed me so far.

My kike-worshipping moron of a father named me Joseph. Fuck him. Fuck Jesus Christ. And fuck you if you don't like it. We live in the judeosphere, deal with it.

If you are unable to accept the fact that Lucy has nothing to do whatsoever with the existence of White men, that's fine. You can have the single example of an ancient chimp skeleton. Yay!

Does anyone here deny that Piltdown man is hoax too?

Devere, where are the fossil records of the millions of variant critters between ape and White man? Why do they not exist? Answer that one simple question satisfactorily, and I'll come over to evolutionism. Hal-ay-jew-ya! Praise Darwin!

If evolution doesn't work and Jeboo didn't make us either, how'd we get here? What's your hypothesis, then?

It's easy enough to turn your logic on its head. Lucy was in Africa, niggers are in Africa, "some Jew" says Lucy is an ancestor of white men. What you're worried about is being related to the nigger middleman. Simple solution: Lucy is not ancestral to nigs. She and her kind somehow got flushed out of Ethiopia and wound up in Greece, where they gave rise to Eurasian hominids. Niggers evolved from the even earlier genus Orrorin, which was walking around bipedally even before Lucy.

Shitty idea? Yeah, but not as far-fetched as you'd think--African monkeys somehow crossed the Atlantic to South America, where they evolved into the prehensile-tailed South American monkeys. Africa and South America used to be connected, but by the time monkeys had evolved they had long since broke apart.


 
Posted : 31/10/2006 7:41 pm
Joseph
(@joseph)
Posts: 451
Honorable Member
 

My hypothesis is that we don't know where everything came from. We don't know where the big bang materials came from or why they banged. We don't really understand much more than the very tippy top of the iceberg of potential human knowledge. It is, ironically, a Christian psychosis that afflicts the evolutionists. The idea that we men are somehow divine, or at least capable of superhuman knowledge is xian at its core. Just as the Christian fool has an answer for everything, so does the "scientist".

The only person I find worth listening to is the one who admits he doesn't know it all. The others are just going to bullshit you.


Vote from the rooftops

 
Posted : 31/10/2006 8:04 pm
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

I don't see the connection between the first two and the last. If anything, the findings of evolution have been utterly twisted by the judeosphere. Jews love evolution because they hate Christians, and knocking out one of Christianity's cherished stories makes them giddy. But they've piled their own offal on top of evolution--particularly racial equality. If anything, evolution would not support racial sameness, but it was Jews starting with Boas and Montagnu that made any approaching of this subject verboten. Coon was one of the last scientists (1960s) to even deal with racial differences.

No, evolution would not support sameness. Evolution is founded on constant variation. Creationism, however, IS founded on sameness. Each of the species was created by God some time and each species remains the same forever, immutable. Today's lion is exactly the same as lions of one million years ago -- per creationism (if creationism these days even allows for one million years of time, let alone 3.5 billion years of time [the age of life on earth] -- creationism used to allow for 4,000 years maximum, or some such, for the creation of the entire universe).

As for Lucy...no, that fossil has NEVER been revealed as a hoax, although you may well find stories about its finders hoaxing it on batshit insane Creationist web sites. What Lucy HAS been subjected to is differences in interpretation--common interpretation says she was a ground-dwelling biped, but minority opinion (not "minority" as in spic, etc.!) thinks she was a tree-dwelling ape.

Good to know about Lucy -- she, therefore, remains one more found piece of the puzzle (even if we still don't know exactly where to put that puzzle piece). Although, as I said, Lucy doesn't support all of evolution on her narrow shoulders (or is it a knee?). Evolution would continue on as a viable scientific theory with or without Lucy.


 
Posted : 31/10/2006 8:10 pm
(@respect-vanpatten)
Posts: 81
Trusted Member
 

My hypothesis is that we don't know where everything came from. We don't know where the big bang materials came from or why they banged. We don't really understand much more than the very tippy top of the iceberg of potential human knowledge. It is, ironically, a Christian psychosis that afflicts the evolutionists. The idea that we men are somehow divine, or at least capable of superhuman knowledge is xian at its core. Just as the Christian fool has an answer for everything, so does the "scientist".

The only person I find worth listening to is the one who admits he doesn't know it all. The others are just going to bullshit you.

I've toyed with that viewpoint from time to time. It's an agnostic view of the world in the LITERAL sense of the word "agnostic," literally, a-gnostic, meaning true knowledge is impossible. There aren't many literal agnostics anymore...people who call themselves "agnostic" these days are just evolutionist athiests with some uncertanty.


 
Posted : 31/10/2006 8:12 pm
(@respect-vanpatten)
Posts: 81
Trusted Member
 

Cann (Kahan, Cohen) is a Jewish name.

It's possible, but "Cann" is also a surname associated with the town of Cann in the county of Dorset, southern England. Isn't there a Canadian hockey player named Cann?

Anyway:
http://houseofnames.com/coatofarms_details.asp?sId=&s=cann


 
Posted : 31/10/2006 8:22 pm
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

My hypothesis is that we don't know where everything came from. We don't know where the big bang materials came from or why they banged. We don't really understand much more than the very tippy top of the iceberg of potential human knowledge. It is, ironically, a Christian psychosis that afflicts the evolutionists. The idea that we men are somehow divine, or at least capable of superhuman knowledge is xian at its core. Just as the Christian fool has an answer for everything, so does the "scientist".

The only person I find worth listening to is the one who admits he doesn't know it all. The others are just going to bullshit you.

Okay. I'll readily admit I don't know everything. I just know what I know. And I happen to know a bit about evolution because I'm interested in the subject and, over the years, have read a fair bit about it, and I read Charles Darwin's book -- one of them, his main one.

I apologize if I've seemed condescending. I do feel rather frustrated with you, because I and RespectVanPatten (someone who really seems quite knowledgeable about this) and others have explained things and the explanations seem to just bounce off your mind like raindrops off rubber mackintoshes.

Let me ask you something. Do you now understand that evolution is simply the genetic change of one species into another over long periods of time? Or do you think lions remain lions through all time -- with no change in their traits? Do you understand that Darwin and others have found and proven the mechanics of evolution -- that is, what makes it happen?


 
Posted : 31/10/2006 8:54 pm
(@donger)
Posts: 234
Reputable Member
 

Do you now understand that evolution is simply the genetic change of one species into another over long periods of time?

No human has survived a long period of time therefore you cannot prove it.
It is not scientific. Science requires repeated unbiased observations.
The apeolutionists need billyions and billyions of years to get the time for random collisions of molecules to change an amoeba into Cro-Shanikwa Moobooygy into a Devere.

Can you now understand this?

Or do you think lions remain lions through all time -- with no change in their traits?

Yes. Joseph asked you to provide skeletons of the missing links.
You can't they don't exist.

Do you understand that Darwin and others have found and proven the mechanics of evolution -- that is, what makes it happen?

No. It exists in your mind.

I have disproven evolution with a repeatable law of theromdynamics.

Web link to the American Medical Association listing the body part that performs the mechanics of apeolution?

The doctor that removed one? The experiment where this mystery body part turned P-Diddy into a Devere?

(3-2-1 waits for the ad hominem :rolleyes: )

And Joseph once you get past the Christian hating there is quite a bit of data to show that animals were designed rather randomly assembled as the jew hypnotized Christian hating simians in the white "movement" fantasize about in their basements. But that is another thread.


The Words of the Prophet Linder
Banning opposition Manly Discussions Jews Name the Jews
Holocaust Frequently Asked Question

 
Posted : 01/11/2006 7:31 am
Joseph
(@joseph)
Posts: 451
Honorable Member
 

Creationism is every bit as absurd as evolution except for one point. The Christians admit that their religion is based on faith, whereas the ape-olutionists lie that their theory is fact and that they have evidence to prove it. Devere has FAITH that the evidence exists, just as Christians swear they can speak to god.

True skeptics, like me, don't buy either sham. I believe that true wisdom comes as much from an awareness of what you don't know, as from knowledge itself.

The irony I mentioned before is the similarity of arguments you get from lemmings when you tell them that the holocaust is a hoax. They "know" that Hitler was a madman because there are so many authorities who say so. Devere knows that Darwin proved evolution because all the "scientists" agree. JP Slovjanski knows that the WTC towers were destroyed by fire because bought engineers say so. Ho hum.


Vote from the rooftops

 
Posted : 01/11/2006 8:01 am
Joseph
(@joseph)
Posts: 451
Honorable Member
 

Devere, this is your theory.

http://www.livescience.com/othernews/051109_evolution_science.html
Mutations

The physical and behavioral changes that make natural selection possible happen at the level of DNA and genes. Such changes are called "mutations."

Mutations can be caused by chemical or radiation damage or errors in DNA replication. Mutations can even be deliberately induced in order to adapt to a rapidly changing environment.

Most times, mutations are either harmful or neutral but in rare instances, a mutation might prove beneficial to the organism. If so, it will become more prevalent in the next generation and spread throughout the population.
[Bullshit. I have shown in a previous post that this is statistically impossible.]

In this way, natural selection guides the evolutionary process, preserving and adding up the beneficial mutations and rejecting the bad ones.


Vote from the rooftops

 
Posted : 01/11/2006 8:09 am
(@c-stoff)
Posts: 305
Reputable Member
 

The irony I mentioned before is the similarity of arguments you get from lemmings when you tell them that the holocaust is a hoax. They "know" that Hitler was a madman because there are so many authorities who say so. Devere knows that Darwin proved evolution because all the "scientists" agree. JP Slovjanski knows that the WTC towers were destroyed by fire because bought engineers say so.

Evolution gives the person of a scientific bent a sense of relief because now they can explain, to their satisfaction, why mankind exists without having to acknowledge that something far superior to themselves is the driving force.

BUT, what about the Drake equation ?

Given the size and age of just our galaxy alone, if the random process of evolution works then the Milky Way (let alone the rest of the universe) should be TEEMING with lifeforms and civilizations far in advance of our own pathetic world...

Where are they ??

There aren't any discernable radio signals nor coherent light pulses to be heard or seen.

Giga-channel receivers have been used for quite a few years now but nothing is heard, only the static whispers of the stars.

So where are all the results of 15-20 billion years of so called "evolutionary processes" that science believes to have occurred in our galaxy ??

I'm sure the answer will be `they are out there and we just haven't found them yet', but plugging even the smallest of variables into the Drake equation tells us that, given the age and size of the Milky Way, there should be hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of civilizations already existing in just our galaxy...

If evolution works, where are they ?

.


 
Posted : 01/11/2006 8:55 am
(@c-stoff)
Posts: 305
Reputable Member
 

Addendum:

Sceince vs. Religion is totally moot when it comes to White racial survival.

The existence of these divided camps is detrimental to any possible WN movement and, as a race, White people need to create a fixed ideology that can be tolerated by all the people in all the camps.

The jew accepts other jews regardless of their beliefs, or lack there of.

But, as we saw in the case of Mr. Blevins, White people that do not agree about science and religion do not seem to be able to put aside their beliefs long enough to just be White and "Get er' done"...

As long as that is the way of the White people, the jews win.

.


 
Posted : 01/11/2006 9:01 am
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Addendum:

Sceince vs. Religion is totally moot when it comes to White racial survival.

The existence of these divided camps is detrimental to any possible WN movement and, as a race, White people need to create a fixed ideology that can be tolerated by all the people in all the camps.

The jew accepts other jews regardless of their beliefs, or lack there of.

But, as we saw in the case of Mr. Blevins, White people that do not agree about science and religion do not seem to be able to put aside their beliefs long enough to just be White and "Get er' done"...

As long as that is the way of the White people, the jews win.

.

The Christian Church has shown itself to be the enemy of the White race throughout history -- and especially now. We need to awaken our blinded brothers and sisters to the complicity of the church in our demise.


 
Posted : 01/11/2006 9:17 am
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

The Christian Church has shown itself to be the enemy of the White race throughout history -- and especially now. We need to awaken our blinded brothers and sisters to the complicity of the church in our demise.

On the other hand, although what I've just said is true, I am concerned about another divisive factor for us right now. It's a dilemma for us. The jews have worked this well.


 
Posted : 01/11/2006 9:19 am
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Devere, this is your theory.

Mutation is one factor involved in variation, but not the only one. When it occurs, it does function as this article segment states -- natural selection utilizing the change or rejecting it.


 
Posted : 01/11/2006 9:22 am
(@c-stoff)
Posts: 305
Reputable Member
 

The Christian Church has shown itself to be the enemy of the White race throughout history -- and especially now. We need to awaken our blinded brothers and sisters to the complicity of the church in our demise.

That is gonna be a hard sell for so many White people...

So many Whites are trapped in the dogma of the church that they would give the world to the jew before they would put aside their belief systems.

The current state of our race's ability to cooperate and put aside differences in belief does not add up to a "win" in the battle against the jew.

Maybe we should pray for a miracle... :D :D :D

.


 
Posted : 01/11/2006 9:29 am
Page 7 / 9
Share: