THE WRATH OF THE AWAKENED SAXON
It was not part of their blood
It came to them very late
With long arrears to make good,
When the SAXONS began to hate,
They were not easily moved,
They were icy-willing to wait
Till every count should be proved
Ere the SAXONS began to hate.
Their voices were even and low,
Their eyes were level and straight,
There was neither sign nor show,
When the SAXONS began to hate.
It was not preached to the crowd
It was not taught by the State,
No man spoke it aloud,
When the SAXONS began to hate.
It was not suddenly bred,
It will not swiftly abate
Through the chilled years ahead
When Time shall count from the date
That the SAXONS began to hate.
--- by Rudyard Kipling
-------------------------------------------------------------
When the White World was a Man's world, a White Man's World, and the entire world was ours by right -- because we were the ones worthy of it.
-------------------------------------------------------------
The poem is found on a website cited by Yankee Jim:
http://www.childrenofyahweh.com/index.htm
What a great poem. Do you have any background on it?
Sorry, I don't know the background -- except that Kipling lived in a time when the White World was masculine and White men were unselfconsciously racist. They were natural men. Hate is a man's emotion, a warrior's emotion, an emotion essential to racial survival. That is why the Enemy tries to make it taboo for us. But we are learning to hate again. We are learning to be men again. We are learning who and what the Enemy is, who to hate and who we hate.
Sorry, I don't know the background -- except that Kipling lived in a time when the White World was masculine and White men were unselfconsciously racist. They were natural men. Hate is a man's emotion, a warrior's emotion, an emotion essential to racial survival. That is why the Enemy tries to make it taboo for us. But we are learning to hate again. We are learning to be men again. We are learning who and what the Enemy is, who to hate and who we hate.
The jew push to outlaw hatred of himself by White Men has the strategic purpose of precluding in the White Race the capability of physically defending themselves against their enemy. Emotion precedes action. Emotion elicits action. Preventing the emotion prevents the action.
The premise underlying acceptance of anti-hate laws by the White Race is the feminization of the White Race. Women think emotionally and "think" (i.e., feel) that there are good emotions and bad emotions, acceptable and unacceptable emotions. Hate, of course, is a "bad" emotion. Therefore, it is acceptable, indeed, a good idea, to outlaw hate.
The rational truth is that there are no "bad" emotions. Emotions are, in themselves, morally neutral. They are evolved motivators to elicit certain specific actions that enhance the likelihood of survival and success in the being in question, including the human being. Men, whose most compelling natural impulse is rationality, understand this truth instinctively. Men know that hate is not a "bad" emotion, but a useful emotion -- as all emotions are in the right circumstance. Men know that racism is not a "bad" emotion, but a useful emotion. Women do not know these truths. They do not know them at an instinctive level. This is what makes their opinion and judgment so vulnerable to manipulation by the enemy. This is why women, in general, as a group, must never have a position of power over the direction of the race, the White Race, as a whole. The jew manipulations turning America into a democracy and then demanding that women be given the vote strategically spelled the downfall of the White Race.
Likewise, there are no morally right or wrong actions. Actions are, in themselves, morally neutral. However, women "think" (i.e., feel) there are good and bad actions: that violence and, specifically, killing are bad and that, therefore, war and even violent self-defense are bad. "There is never a justification for violence." How often do we hear the generalized Husband/Father/Mother of White Women (i.e., the government) tell the people that Lie -- particularly, when White Male Racism begins to assert itself, as it did recently in Sydney. Women buy this lie lock stock and barrel. Since women are in a position of at least equal power to men in our brave new democracies, natural male defensive action is immediately stymied.
Thus, has the White Race been castrated and placed at the mercy of its enemy.
BTW, any idiot who responds to this post with the word "mysceginist" is a woman or a kike or a kike-alike. Labeling White Male Rationality is one of the jew castration strategies. As in all else, women "think" (i.e., feel) there are morally good words and bad words -- that to be called/labelled a bad word is bad, very bad, a fate worse than death and that, therefore, any action that could be so labelled is to be avoided at all cost. And, in fact, the cost of abiding by this feminine impulse is all cost -- the annihilation of our race.
Nor is this post a denigration of women. It is a generalized description of women. Descriptions are neither, in themselves, morally good or bad. Descriptions are morally neutral. What I am trying to do is tell the Truth about men and women, so that we, our race, can base our actions, our strategies, upon Truth, rather than Feelings. Feelings must operate, must exist, in the service of truth, not the other way around.
Indeed, what I have given you is Male Truth -- rational reasoning. (There is a place, a good place, for female emotionalism]not at the head of state or the head of a race or the head of anything. The head of anything must be the head, not the heart.)
We must base our actions on rational bases. Nothing else. Emotions must be used only in service of rational ends. This is the Masculine Way. It must be our way if we are to survive this, our race's, greatest test -- against a masculine racial enemy.
Very insightful. We live in a Brave Jew World with so many varieties of SOMA to choose from, why would you actually want to do stuff?
The jew push to outlaw hatred of himself by White Men has the strategic purpose of precluding in the White Race the capability of physically defending themselves against their enemy. Emotion precedes action. Emotion elicits action. Preventing the emotion prevents the action.
The premise underlying acceptance of anti-hate laws by the White Race is the feminization of the White Race. Women think emotionally and "think" (i.e., feel) that there are good emotions and bad emotions, acceptable and unacceptable emotions. Hate, of course, is a "bad" emotion. Therefore, it is acceptable, indeed, a good idea, to outlaw hate.
The rational truth is that there are no "bad" emotions. Emotions are, in themselves, morally neutral. They are evolved motivators to elicit certain specific actions that enhance the likelihood of survival and success in the being in question, including the human being. Men, whose most compelling natural impulse is rationality, understand this truth instinctively. Men know that hate is not a "bad" emotion, but a useful emotion -- as all emotions are in the right circumstance. Men know that racism is not a "bad" emotion, but a useful emotion. Women do not know these truths. They do not know them at an instinctive level. This is what makes their opinion and judgment so vulnerable to manipulation by the enemy. This is why women, in general, as a group, must never have a position of power over the direction of the race, the White Race, as a whole. The jew manipulations turning America into a democracy and then demanding that women be given the vote strategically spelled the downfall of the White Race.
Likewise, women "think" (i.e., feel) there are good and bad actions: that violence and, specifically, killing are bad and that, therefore, war and even violent self-defense are bad. "There is never a justification for violence." How often do we hear the generalized Husband/Father/Mother of White Women (i.e., the government) tell the people that Lie -- particularly, when White Male Racism begins to assert itself, as it did recently in Sydney. Women buy this lie lock stock and barrel. Since women are in a position of at least equal power to men in our brave new democracies, natural male defensive action is immediately stymied.
Thus, has the White Race been castrated and placed at the mercy of its enemy.
BTW, any idiot who responds to this post with the word "mysceginist" is a woman or a kike or a kike-alike. Labeling White Male Rationality is one of the jew castration strategies. As in all else, women "think" (i.e., feel) there are morally good words and bad words -- that to be called/labelled a bad word is bad, very bad, a fate worse than death and that, therefore, any action that could be so labelled is to be avoided at all cost. And, in fact, the cost of abiding by this feminine impulse is all cost -- the annihilation of our race.
What I have given you is mere Male Truth -- rational reasoning. (There is a place, a good place, for female emotionalism]not at the head of state or the head of a race or the head of anything. The head of anything must be the head, not the heart.)
We must base our actions on rational bases. Nothing else. Emotions must be used only in service of rational ends. This is the Masculine Way. It must be our way if we are to survive this, our race's, greatest test.
Great poem! This is the sentiment behind the old saw "don't get me started".
KILL YOUR TV! Or at least stop taking it more seriously than a goldfish.
another good Kipling poem is "the stranger."
I believe the actual name of the poem is
The Beginnings
and the actual line is
"Wnen the English began to hate."
I have seen it written with 'saxon' also, confused me for a long time. Maybe it got changed some where along the way?
I am pulling this info from The Works of Rudyard Kipling
Wordsworth edition
My favs would be The Young Queen, An American, and A Song of the White Man. At this time anyway, he wrote so many.
Form follows function --Louis Sullivan