Half-white Barack Obama’s reelection as US president has opened a golden window of opportunity for decisive political action for dedicated American pro-European activists—provided they approach the situation with realism and a thorough understanding of the long-term nature of the struggle for the survival of Western Civilization.
Although many pro-white commentators have lamented the reelection of Obama, in reality it is the least worst alternative of seeing a two-faced “conservative” like Romney in the White House.
Quite apart from Romney’s insane foreign policy, which, like the policy of the equally insane George Bush Jr., would have driven America even more quickly into another “God told me to do it” type war against Iran on behalf of Israel, the real problem with having a white “conservative” in the White House would have been to dull white Americans for an even longer period of time to the threat facing their existence.
At least, with a rabidly anti-white establishment back in the White House, there will be no chance that concerned white Americans will be under any illusion about the country’s direction—which would not be the case with Romney.
This is borne out by the fact that concerning the real, critical issues facing America (immigration, the economy, and foreign wars), there was absolutely no difference between the two candidates.
With reference to foreign affairs, the election campaign was an embarrassing display of who could be more craven and subservient to Israel.
In that sense, Romney faced an uphill battle: in an attempt to woo the all-important (in Florida and some important Eastern Seaboard states) Jewish vote, he backed the ultra-right Likud version of Zionism, whereas Obama played the more traditionally Jewish American Labor Party (the Israeli one, that is) line.
Needless to say, Obama succeeded in holding on to the majority of the Jewish vote, despite the best efforts of Likud backers such as Las Vegas casino boss Sheldon Adelson to buy the election for Romney.
In actual fact, Romney “just” losing is about the best possible scenario to have occurred.
As all the “experts” have now admitted, this was a highly racially-charged election, with almost all blacks and the vast, overwhelming, majority of Hispanics and Asians voting for Obama.
Nonwhites made up at least 27 percent of the voters, although the real figure is probably higher, given that many states, including California, Nevada, and New Mexico (which are all heavily populated by Mexicans, many of whom are illegal but could easily have voted) have no voter ID requirements.
The racial breakdown of the voting turnout is the most interesting result of the poll, and also offers a glimmer of hope.
Despite there being almost no real policy differences, Romney’s vote—of at least 58 million—came almost exclusively from whites.

Obama’s vote was made up of blacks, Hispanics, and a minority of white liberals. Exit polls indicated that Romney took 60 percent of the white vote—but almost no “real” nonwhite vote.
Obama, on the other hand, took at least 80 percent of the Hispanic vote and over 90 percent (and likely close to 100 percent) of the black vote.
Obama lost every age group of white voters, including those aged 18 to 29, which he won by 10 percentage points in 2008.
Obama lost the white vote by a larger margin than in 2008 when he polled 43 percent—this time he polled 40 percent.
Where does all this leave the future direction of America?
The answer is, essentially unchanged.
1. Economic decline. There can be little doubt that Obama will definitively move on the controversial healthcare program, which will further impoverish large numbers of working-class whites, who will be legally obliged to pay into state healthcare over and above their existing tax burden.
This extra tax burden—which may well be too much for many to bear—will be to the benefit of Obama’s core constituency of nonwhites.
According to 2005 figures published by Indiana University, blacks receive far more welfare, proportionally to their numbers, than do whites. A black family living in poverty is nearly three times more likely to live in subsidized housing than a white family living in poverty and are also nearly twice as likely to be receiving food stamps, despite being “only” 14 percent of the population.
This situation has only worsened since 2005, and the massive influx of Mestizos has for, example, caused California hospitals to run up extra bills of at least $1 billion, driving many into bankruptcy. And that is in just one state (which was, of course, won convincingly by Obama).
In other words, severe economic times lay in store for large numbers of already alienated white Americans. There is nothing quite like economic pressure to bring out the fight in someone.
2. Immigration Amnesty/”Reform”. There is also little doubt that Obama will now move definitively to bring the “illegal immigration crisis” to a head—by taking steps, one way or another, of letting the 12 or 20 million (depending upon which source you consult) illegal immigrants gain permanent residence.
Already, according to some figures, every month, some 50,000 new “Latinos” become eligible to vote.
That alone, even without an illegal immigrant amnesty, has settled the deal. America is no longer a white country, and very soon—sooner than many expect—it will be a decisively majority nonwhite country.
Would Romney be any different? Unlikely, given the cowardly nature of “conservatives.”
As mentioned above, the only effect a Romney victory would have had would be to continue the immigration invasion under some other guise.
This was, after all, exactly what “arch conservative” Ronald Reagan did in 1986, when he signed into law the first mass amnesty which started the Mestizo invasion of America.
3. Foreign Wars. The media has deliberately created the impression that somehow Obama is less in favor of war with Iran than Romney.
While it is certainly true that Obama does not appear to be quite as mad as Romney on this issue, it should never be forgotten that Obama has stepped up the intensity of the conflict in Afghanistan, not toned it down.
It is estimated that the number of deaths from the Obama administration’s drone strikes is more than four times what it was during the Bush administration.
Contrary to previous election promises, Obama has still not closed the Guantanamo Bay facility.
Finally, Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and the White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, have all publicly warned that with regard to Iran’s mythical atom bomb, “all options are on the table”—a clear reference to their being ready to attack Iran with military force.
Already, three US Navy aircraft carriers are in the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Arabia, which military experts say would be necessary for any attack on Iran.
In other words, there is just as much chance of another war for Israel’s interests under Obama as there might have been under Romney—with possibly the only difference being in the manic nature of the accompanying rhetoric.
So why then, does all this seeming gloom-and-doom for European Americans offer any sort of hope at all? And what, if anything, should be done about it?
Firstly, activists and would-be activists must prepare themselves psychologically for the inevitable: that traditional white America is going to disappear. The demographic tipping point has been reached, and passed.
This healthy dose of realism will go a long way to assuage what might otherwise be a sense of helplessness and its concordant decision “not to do anything.”
Instead of unrealistically expecting to “save America,” a new outlook on the racial situation and its global perspective has to be formulated, and accepted.
This new perspective entails the following:
- As stated in the epilogue to March of the Titans, it is not necessary to win a majority of whites over to a racial understanding—just a significant minority. Activists only have to ensure that the core of our people is preserved.
Those who are too weak to withstand the multiracial propaganda onslaught, and who fall victim to miscegenation or childlessness, are not going to be part of the Western rebirth in any event.
- Liberals, by their very nature, are the first type of whites who are going to vanish, and once they are gone, pro-white activists will find their job immeasurably easier.
- Activists must accept that a racial geographic re-alignment is going to be necessary. A congregation of whites in their own defined geographic area is going to be vital to long-term survival in a sea of nonwhites.
This will only come about by a combination of white flight and deliberate planning. See the Orania project in otherwise overrun South Africa as a practical example of what needs to be planned, and started, everywhere.

How?

The key to all of this is simply to reach as many whites as possible with the message of racial consciousness.
This can only be done through practical political participation—in other words, participation in the public political process—simply because this is the only way to spread the message as quickly as possible.
This does not mean engaging in public acts which only expose weakness (such as demonstrations of a derisory handful of people) but by considered, direct political campaigns.
In this regard, Rand Paul-type shots at the US Senate seats still hold out the best “bang-for-buck” option.
To campaign for senate seats, activists only have to find two decent candidates per state, or even one (due to the staggered nature of the Senate races) at a time.
In addition, these highly selective campaigns (where best suited areas can be targeted instead of “shotgun” style effort) can allow for a concentration of activists in one area.
It is worth emphasizing again that victory, although nice, is not necessary—just a reasonable result, repeated a few times, is enough to drive the media into a frenzy and reach huge numbers of white voters.
And this is where the positive aspects of the Romney campaign will come into play.
It can be safely assumed that the vast majority—perhaps 95 percent or more of the 58 million odd Romney votes—are from whites who are now thoroughly disaffected from the establishment.
This disaffection can only increase as the full impact of Obamination takes root.
In other words, pro-activists will be dealing with an increasingly threatened, marginalized and disaffected core group.
Out of this mass, it will be possible to recruit the core of a renewal, which, unhindered by white liberals, will be able to stake out a new dawn for European Americans.
The challenge is open to all takers. All that is required is for brave men and women to take it up.
Now is not the time to halt and engage in navel-gazing. Now is the time to redouble efforts and join in the final battle for the survival of Western Civilization.

http://marchofthetitans.com/us-elections-now-is-the-time-to-redouble-the-political-war/