RE: JP

With the exception of the usual small statistical moron percentage, there are no real White parents who wish for their children to be stupid or under-educated. Quite the contrary. It is the jew’s influence that appeals to the lowest common denominator and that is erroneously touted as the norm, and it is not.

Surely we can point to ideals, but in this case it would be more appropriate to point to the Aryan world without the jew’s influence as a model. That would more then certainly approach the Aryan ideal society then any other scenario with the jew still being present.

In 1833, before the jew had control of America’s educational system, William Holmes McGuffey introduced his text books to the American education system called, The McGuffey Readers. This series of text books were America’s elementary school standard texts for over one hundred years.

The high academic caliber of The McGuffey Readers, outlined below, will give us some indication by comparison of just how jewed-down America‘s kids are today.

THE MCGUFFEY READERS

In 1833, a small publishing company called Truman and Smith based in Cincinnati, Ohio, became interested in the idea of school texts. Truman and Smith began scouting for an eminent educator who could create a series of readers They happened upon Rev. William Holmes McGuffey.

Rev. William Holmes McGuffey had already planned a series of readers and had published his first reader. This first reader of 1841 introduces children to McGuffey's ethical code. The child modeled in this book is prompt, good, kind, honest and truthful. This first book contained fifty-five lessons.

The second reader appeared simultaneously with the first and followed the same pattern. It contained reading and spelling with eighty-five lessons, sixteen pictures and one-hundred sixty-six pages. It outlined history, biology, astronomy, zoology, botany]Sounds like they would still be terrific for home schooling.

 

I think what Theme of Sadness is trying to say is that "comrades" who recant were never really part of the movement. David Duke never recanted so therefore the comment doesn't apply to him as we all know. :cheers: