The definition of bad rhetoric

Vox certainly is a genius, but can be a dick at times.

On the other hand, Crowe is a retard, but is an asshole all the time.

Either way, both are wrong in demanding that Aryans follow the rules of English usage like good little christian-conservative-republicans in the Aryans fight for survival. If Vox’s and Crowe’s strategy of playing by the rules is followed, the best Aryans can hope for is that the sub-humans will admire the Aryans for playing by the rules until the end.

Vox may be technically correct, the Aryan race is not facing genocide by the dictionary definition. Maybe it is bad rhetoric. But does that mean the enemies of the Aryan race are not planing genocide for the Aryan race? Does it mean the Aryan race is not facing genocide?

Does Vox propose any good rhetoric?

Maybe the dictionary definition of genocide will just have to be expanded.

Maybe the “migrants” that are flowing into White countries do not fit the traditional definition of “invaders”? But does invaders not describe them from the Aryan perspective? These subhumans are occupying territory that prior to the boomer generation was thought to be solely belonging to the Aryan race. Is it not the plan of the “migrants” for them and their descendants to occupy the territory of their “new home” indefinitely?

Maybe the “migrants” are not “mercenaries” by the traditional definition of “mercenary” because they are not signing a contract for a specific number of shekels. But the jew and their shobboss goy has created laws in White nations that guarantee the “migrants” privileges and benefits such as welfare and social services if the “migrants” risk their lives to enter a Aryan nations illegally.

But like a good little christian-conservative-republican, Crowe will self-righteously tell us that many of the “migrants” enter Aryan nations legally and complied with the laws so it would be wrong to call them anything else other then “valid visa holders”. After all, that is how the dictionary and laws define them.

Maybe calling subhumans occupying territories in Aryan nations “fake”-citizens is just wrong, because, well, in fact, they have documents the prove they are officially legally documented citizens according to the laws of Aryan nations and by the definitions of modern dictionaries they are “legal” “citizens” of the “nation”.

But wait, the “migrants” cannot be referred to as “subhumans” because by the dictionary definition, and not to mention scientific definition, they are human.

Better stop calling the “valid visa holdesr” and “new citizens” “parasites” because Crowe will tell us that they do not fit the dictionary definition of “parasite”.

Crowe is one of those assholes who will claim the “peer viewed journal” are legitimate sources of facts which to base an argument.

Could call Crowe a cuck, but he would point that that use of “cuck” does not comply with the dictionary definition of cuck. Or has the definition been expanded to make such use valid?

But wait, is it not the case the meanings of words change. Isn’t that really part of the definition of language, that the meaning of words are expanded and contracted, bent and abused, to describe new scenarios over time, scenarios that no existing word captures?

Is Crowe suggesting that Aryans create new words to describe their rather unique situation? Maybe the new words can be fashioned from Latin and Greek? But will these new words really have any chance of gaining common usage? Not likely.

Why do dictionary claim some words to have archaic definitions?

Maybe one reason the jew is so successful at jewing is their ability and willingness o manipulate words and language? Not that the Aryan has this ability to be so deceptive.

The difference between Vox and Crowe, is that Vox is intelligent enough to know that that those he is disagreeing with are smart enough to understand the meaning of the English word being debated. On the other hand, Crowe is so fucking stupid, he literally believes he is some type of genius that knows things others do not. And with perception of himself being a genius, Crowe, a retard, feels he is justified in attacking others.

Vox is far more justified in being a dick then Crowe is for being an asshole. Other than the three standard deviations the separate their IQs, Vox has his own blog. When one has their own blog they are justified in pushing their personal points of view. Crowe, on the other hand, is using the forum created, managed and maintained by others from which to attack. If Crowe wants others to comply with is christian-conservative-republican sensibilities on others, he should create is own blog. He could call his blog Crowe’s Craps, from where he can enforce his christian-conservative-republican sensibilities.

Consider this, at one time, the dictionary definition of asshole was defined to be an orifice from which waste was expelled. Now it is universally accepted to define somebody with Crowe’s personality type.

Now, none should consider what has been said here to mean that honorable men cannot have disagreements, and debate, argue and even fight about those disagreements, honorably. But the word honor is a one who’s definition is unknown to Crowe.

Note:

I will not be reading any responses to this thread, like I did not read any of the responses to previous threads of a similar nature. The thumbs will tell me all I need to know about the average poster. Life is too short and the survival of the Aryan race is to important to waste time on sub-Aryan filth like Crowe.