WARNING! Blonde's t...
 
Notifications
Clear all

WARNING! Blonde's to become Extinct

26 Posts
11 Users
0 Reactions
2,515 Views
VikingWarrior
(@vikingwarrior)
Posts: 437
Honorable Member
 

THE modern gentleman may prefer blondes. But new research has found that it was cavemen who were the first to be lured by flaxen locks.
According to the study, north European women evolved blonde hair and blue eyes at the end of the Ice Age to make them stand out from their rivals at a time of fierce competition for scarce males.

The study argues that blond hair originated in the region because of food shortages 10,000-11,000 years ago. Until then, humans had the dark brown hair and dark eyes that still dominate in the rest of the world. Almost the only sustenance in northern Europe came from roaming herds of mammoths, reindeer, bison and horses. Finding them required long, arduous hunting trips in which numerous males died, leading to a high ratio of surviving women to men.

Lighter hair colours, which started as rare mutations, became popular for breeding and numbers increased dramatically, according to the research, published under the aegis of the University of St Andrews.

“Human hair and eye colour are unusually diverse in northern and eastern Europe (and their) origin over a short span of evolutionary time indicates some kind of selection,” says the study by Peter Frost, a Canadian anthropologist. Frost adds that the high death rate among male hunters “increased the pressures of sexual selection on early European women, one possible outcome being an unusual complex of colour traits.”

Frost’s theory, to be published this week in Evolution and Human Behavior, the academic journal, was supported by Professor John Manning, a specialist in evolutionary psychology at the University of Central Lancashire. “Hair and eye colour tend to be uniform in many parts of the world, but in Europe there is a welter of variants,” he said. “The mate choice explanation now being put forward is, in my mind, close to being correct.”

Frost’s theory is also backed up by a separate scientific analysis of north European genes carried out at three Japanese universities, which has isolated the date of the genetic mutation that resulted in blond hair to about 11,000 years ago.

The hair colour gene MC1R has at least seven variants in Europe and the continent has an unusually wide range of hair and eye shades. In the rest of the world, dark hair and eyes are overwhelmingly dominant.

Just how such variety emerged over such a short period of time in one part of the world has long been a mystery. According to the new research, if the changes had occurred by the usual processes of evolution, they would have taken about 850,000 years. But modern humans, emigrating from Africa, reached Europe only 35,000-40,000 years ago.

Instead, Frost attributes the rapid evolution to how they gathered food. In Africa there was less dependence on animals and women were able to collect fruit for themselves. In Europe, by contrast, food gathering was almost exclusively a male hunter’s preserve. The retreating ice sheets left behind a landscape of fertile soil with plenty of grass and moss for herbivorous animals to eat, but few plants edible for humans. Women therefore took on jobs such as building shelters and making clothes while the men went on hunting trips, where the death rate was high.

The increase in competition for males led to rapid change as women struggled to evolve the most alluring qualities. Frost believes his theory is supported by studies which show blonde hair is an indicator for high oestrogen levels in women.

Jilly Cooper, 69, the author, described how in her blonde youth she had “certainly got more glances. I remember when I went to Majorca when I was 20, my bum was sore from getting pinched”.

However, Jodie Kidd, 27, the blonde model, disagrees with the theory: “I don’t think being blonde makes you more ripe for sexual activity. It’s much more to do with personality than what you look like. Beauty is much deeper than the colour of your hair.”

Film star blondes such as Marilyn Monroe, Brigitte Bardot, Sharon Stone and Scarlett Johansson are held up as ideals of feminine allure. However, the future of the blonde is uncertain.

Correction: The World Health Organisation has asked us to remove an earlier erroneous reference suggesting it had conducted a study which forecast natural blonds were likely to be extinct within 200 years. The WHO issued a formal denial of such a study in 2002. Click here for the WHO statement.

Here


The Legacy of Dr. William Luther Pierce

VNN Video

 
Posted : 15/03/2006 6:32 pm
H.N.
 H.N.
(@h-n)
Posts: 273
Reputable Member
 

Hitler did not consider all white people to be equal. While Hitler did amire the French, English, and Nordic cultures, he did not admire the Polish, Slavic and Russian ones. Even today, you look at the Slavic countries and you look at the White Western European ones and there is a huge difference.

It couldn't have been because in the 1930s they were COMMUNIST would it?

And yes, the aryan race does include non blondes as well, and no the Fuhrer did not think non blondes were inferior to blondes what ever incorrect information you might think is true.

Hitler, Göring, Goebbels, and Hess did not have blonde hair, although Hitler's eyes were blue. So why would they think that they themselves were less than blondes? The aryan race can be divided into seperate divisions, the Germans are alpine people, northern europeans are Nordic, Italians are mediterranean etc... Just because a white person of European ancestry dosent have blonde hair and blue eyes this does not make them un-aryan!

Some of the far eastern european people, like in sibera and other places are part asian as well, so this accounts for their diffrent look.

Again, it is an incredibly stupid thing to suggest that non blonde whites are not aryan and somehow lower than blondes. You sound like a jew when you say this.


The desire to remain racially pure is a proof of the vitality and good health of a race. -Adolf Hitler

 
Posted : 15/03/2006 9:10 pm
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
 

It couldn't have been because in the 1930s they were COMMUNIST would it?

And yes, the aryan race does include non blondes as well, and no the Fuhrer did not think non blondes were inferior to blondes what ever incorrect information you might think is true.

Hitler, Göring, Goebbels, and Hess did not have blonde hair, although Hitler's eyes were blue. So why would they think that they themselves were less than blondes? The aryan race can be divided into seperate divisions, the Germans are alpine people, northern europeans are Nordic, Italians are mediterranean etc... Just because a white person of European ancestry dosent have blonde hair and blue eyes this does not make them un-aryan!

Some of the far eastern european people, like in sibera and other places are part asian as well, so this accounts for their diffrent look.

Again, it is an incredibly stupid thing to suggest that non blonde whites are not aryan and somehow lower than blondes. You sound like a jew when you say this.

The Aryan race is the most diverse of any race: certainly in eye color and hair color -- including the entire range from light hair to dark hair, light eyes to dark eyes. Indeed, it is the only race that is diverse in this regard. The point, Hitler's point, is/was not that blue-eyed blonds are superior to other Aryans without these attributes, but that blue-eyed blonds are quintessentially Aryan. These attributes are the exact opposite of the eye and hair color of the non-white races, of all other races or mixed races. It is this oppositeness and uniqueness that Hitler valued and all the world values -- as well as the sheer beauty of blue-eyed blondness.

However, something to realize is that, actually, red hair and brown hair (in all its shades) are likewise uniquely Aryan traits -- traits to be deeply treasured by our people. And the jews are in the process of creating a world of sameness in hair and eye color (and eventually skin color). Indeed, jews are literally in the process of utterly eliminating human diversity from the world -- and calling their process of so doing: "a celebration of diversity." What a stunningly unmatchable evil entity the jew is. Truly an alien entity. Non-human in its evil.

Back to blue-eyed blondness. The Aryan race is deeply motivated by mythology, by the eternal war of Good versus Evil, of Light versus Dark. Good and Light are symbolized in the Aryan attributes of the blue-eyed blond; just as the non-white's Evil and Darkness are symbolized by the non-white's unvarying, inevitable black eyes, black hair. This mythology subliminally impels the Aryan race to defend itself against the non-white hordes who would destroy us, the non-whites who, throughout our history have, when given the opportunity, enslaved and raped and killed our blue-eyed blond women. If the fucking jews succeed in exterminating blue-eyed blonds from the Aryan race, they will have won a deep and eternally wounding victory against our race -- a terrible, perhaps even a mortal wound to the Aryan soul.


 
Posted : 15/03/2006 9:42 pm
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
 

By Vox Day

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

I will freely admit that I am perhaps more partial than most to the Nordic beauty. This may be due in part to growing up in Minnesota, where one is surrounded at all times by blondes named Johnson, Nelson and Olsen, where "ON or EN?" is a most commonly asked question, where "swedegians" are considered half-breed mongrels and where girls who look exactly like Scarlett Johansson do not receive Maybelline contracts, but work as janitors at the local health club instead.

Minnesota is, perhaps, the only state in the Union where there are more Kirstins, Kjirstins and Kjerstins than Christines of either the "C" or the "K" variety. For my first six months at the East Coast university I attended, every woman named Kristin was under the impression that I had a speech impediment.

Now, none of this is intended as any slight to the non-blonde, you understand. A man would have to be struck blind in order to fail to appreciate the powerful African beauty of Tyra Banks, the delicate Asian appeal of Lucy Liu or the allure of the dark-haired English rose as exemplified by Kate Beckinsale. There is also much to be said for the Celtic redhead, the Latina and the Italiana, to say nothing of the Brazilian melange.

Important to establish oneself as a multi-culturalist BEFORE stooping to defend one's own WHITE race. I used to like this guy -- and then I woke up.

Even so, I think you will understand why I am deeply troubled by the horrifying news that blondes may soon be an endangered species, if they are not already.

Well, that's good anyway.

A study by the World Health Organisation found that natural blonds are likely to be extinct within 200 years because there are too few people carrying the blond gene. According to the WHO study, the last natural blond is likely to be born in Finland during 2202.

I think the latest retraction is a jew-impelled lie -- as usual. I think the study was the absolute truth. Of course, the entire White race is being exterminated -- it's just that the blonds and red-heads will lead the way.

Understandably, the notion of blondeness as something worth preserving is more than a little tainted by the memory of a certain infamous Ayran enthusiast, whose record of respect for genetic human heterodoxy marks what one hopes is the definitive low.

More inevitability. Always the denegration of the German. Lemming!!!!

But one need not argue for racial superiority or even admit to the existence of race – in order to favor the survival of genetic diversity within the race as a whole, however superficial the genetic marker.

Oh no. Whatever you do, don't tell the TRUTH. Notice how, for the lemmings, the various human races and, still more honestly, the various human SPECIES -- are all just one "race." What an idiot -- or traitor.

During last year's brief media uproar over "Prussian Blue," I found myself wondering what was so wildly outrageous about two young girls whose primary interest appeared to be perpetuating their blondeness. Regardless of whether the National Socialist Hess was or was not a man of peace – and the fact is that the Allied powers thought well enough of his quixotic mission to spare his life when others lower in the National Socialist hierarchy were executed – how is it any worse to profess one's concern for the perpetuation of one's genetic kindred than to "fight" publicly against the effects of assimilation and intermarriage on one's ethnicity, to give but one example?

You're getting warmer, Vox. Now...open your eyes.

As we live in a profoundly oversensitive age wherein the profesionally offended are ever looking to take offense, let me state for the record that I am in favor of the continued existence and well-being of both Jews and blondes. (Ironically, and no doubt this is another Minnesota thing, the Jewish family I know best happens to be three-fifths blonde anyhow, so it's not as if the two are completely incompatible.)

No, Vox. They are completely incompatible. The jew, Vox, is specifically trying to exterminate YOUR RACE, the race that uniquely evolved blondness -- and even more specifically, trying to exterminate blond Aryans -- and even more specifically, blond Germans. Why? Because blond Germans are the quintessential Aryans. And Aryans are the exact biological and moral opposites of jews -- as opposite as Good is from Evil.

Perhaps it is only my imagination, but it seems to me that the ubiquitous celebration of diversity that began in the '90s has taken an insidious turn of late. These days, one has to look hard to find an advertisement featuring a black man paired with a black woman, an Asian man paired with an Asian woman, and, if two white individuals are paired together, you can just about be certain that they will both be of the same sex. I see nothing inherently evil in cross-cultural or cross-racial relationships, but it seems very strange to assert that there is somehow something inherently virtuous in them, and even stranger to imply that they are the historical norm.

So you noticed, eh? Who's doing this, Vox? Answer that question -- and you might awaken.

Indeed, if one were to possess the hyperactive imagination of a feminist, one might well conclude there is a secret war against blondes. Could it be that the producers of hair-color kits are seeking to eliminate the natural competition?

Most amusing, Vox. And now be honest. Say what you REALLY SECRETLY think. It's the jews, stupid. There is, without the shadow of a doubt, a war being waged against blonds, Aryan blonds. Why? First -- Who? Jews. Okay, now Why? Because the jews are murdering the German people, the German sub-race, the quintessential Aryan, the historical defender of the Aryan race. With the Germans completely gone, the jew will breathe so much easier. He knows the rest of the Aryan race is not far behind on his kosher conveyor belt to Aryan oblivion.

Now, I am not calling for government action, eugenics laws, intermarriage bans or even activist groups with silly acronymic names. I am a libertarian, after all, and I am merely expressing my opinion that it will be a true aesthetic loss to mankind if, one day, the only blondes are those produced by hydrogen peroxide.

It certainly will be an esthetic loss. But it will be so much more than that. It will be a decisive blow against the survival of the White Race itself, the race (there is such a thing as race, Vox) that has created nearly every high civilization created by human kind. And too bad you aren't calling for government action, eugenics laws, and intermarriage bans. You have a pretty large megaphone in your hands (since you've been a good little goy). Too too bad -- because that is exactly what is required. But that would be too "revolutionary" a stand for a libertarian, would it not, Voxy boy? Knees aknocking, young White fellow?


 
Posted : 15/03/2006 10:26 pm
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
 

A friend of mine emailed my response to Vox's article to Vox. I'll let you know if he responds. In fact, Vox was invited to respond directly on this thread. I hope he does.


 
Posted : 15/03/2006 10:48 pm
(@anonymous)
Posts: 84005
Illustrious Member Guest
Topic starter
 

The increase in competition for males led to rapid change as women struggled to evolve the most alluring qualities. Frost believes his theory is supported by studies which show blonde hair is an indicator for high oestrogen levels in women.

What a wheelbarrow load of horseshit.

Darwinism run amok.

I cant believe these sycophants are allowed to call themselves professionals.

Can you imagine dark southern european looking women clenching all the muscles in their bodies while clicking their heals together trying to struggle to change their genes to "evolve" more disirable blonde hair and other associated traits!

FUCK, THAT IS SO DAMN FUNNY. And this horse shit passes for theory! Unfuckingbelievable.

--------

Now let me just tell people and the "scientist" if he happens to read this, how blondes came into being.

You listening?

Ok,

Here goes.

Caucasoid people happened to produce one baby who had a mutated gene that produced less malanine than average Caucasian type people, that blonde baby grew up and produced offspring, who's offspring spread this mutated gene even farther. Eventually, people who carried this mutated gene got isolated from the dark haired population, and produced blonds every pregnancy, since all they had was blonde genes.

Duh!

Struggled to evolve genes!!!!! L-O-L!!!!!

I guess this "scientist" is trying to get us to believe that Mestizoes or Mulattoes can become blonde themselves if they just HOPE hard enough!!!!!!!


 
Posted : 15/03/2006 11:22 pm
(@grep14w)
Posts: 283
Reputable Member
 

Grep is correct. If you have two blonde parents, the child will almost always be blonde themselves. So it increases the chance of keeping blondes around. But if you mate a blonde with a black hair, brown-eye person, the odds of them coming out blonde and blue eyed are very much reduced.

The problem with blondes disappearing is the non-blonde whites mating with them. That's just a simple fact.

But my point was also that non-blondes can pass on blonde genes to their children, so just because the number of blondes might decrease does not mean that blondes are going extinct. As long as whites avoid racial miscegenation, blondes will be around as long as whites are around.

I like blondes too, but we shouldn't let this become a divisive issue. Whites have enough problems with disunity as it is. I find your points about blondes interesting, but far too theoretical. They have no practical application. We aren't going to have any kind of situation where you get to pick the future breeding stock of the white race; we have to deal with the reality that we are in, and that reality is that most of our problems would go away pretty quickly if whites would unite and stop dividing themselves over petty differences.


 
Posted : 16/03/2006 2:39 am
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
 

What a wheelbarrow load of horseshit.

Darwinism run amok.

I cant believe these sycophants are allowed to call themselves professionals.

Can you imagine dark southern european looking women clenching all the muscles in their bodies while clicking their heals together trying to struggle to change their genes to "evolve" more disirable blonde hair and other associated traits!

FUCK, THAT IS SO DAMN FUNNY. And this horse shit passes for theory! Unfuckingbelievable.

--------

Now let me just tell people and the "scientist" if he happens to read this, how blondes came into being.

You listening?

Ok,

Here goes.

Caucasoid people happened to produce one baby who had a mutated gene that produced less malanine than average Caucasian type people, that blonde baby grew up and produced offspring, who's offspring spread this mutated gene even farther. Eventually, people who carried this mutated gene got isolated from the dark haired population, and produced blonds every pregnancy, since all they had was blonde genes.

Duh!

Struggled to evolve genes!!!!! L-O-L!!!!!

I guess this "scientist" is trying to get us to believe that Mestizoes or Mulattoes can become blonde themselves if they just HOPE hard enough!!!!!!!

Your scenario leaves out a vital factor. While chance mutation played a role in the first blondes, this does not mean there was no competition among women to get men and that blondness was not an advantage in that competition. In order for blondness to catch on, there must have been a mating preference for blondes. Moreover, it's probable it worked both ways -- men preferring blond women and women preferring blond men. The latter is what is left out in the article. The fact that this preference of women for blond men in pre-jew times is left out is due to jew conditioning that women should prefer dark men: "tall, dark, and handsome" -- as the jew movies have been pushing and pushing and pushing since the jews took control of Hollywood -- which push is, in itself, part of the jew war against blondes.


 
Posted : 16/03/2006 8:14 am
(@jenab)
Posts: 1322
Noble Member
 

Just how such variety emerged over such a short period of time in one part of the world has long been a mystery. According to the new research, if the changes had occurred by the usual processes of evolution, they would have taken about 850,000 years. But modern humans, emigrating from Africa, reached Europe only 35,000-40,000 years ago.

Notice how stubborn the controlled establishment can be, providing evidence that the immigration of humans from Africa to Europe occurred about 850 kya, then at once following that with a bare assertion of the recent out-of-Africa PC dogma. And they do it every time there's evidence that the dogma is false. Mention the evidence, scratch the head, then go back and issue a statement consistent with the very dogma that the evidence refutes.

Jerry Abbott


 
Posted : 27/05/2006 4:25 pm
Charles
(@charles)
Posts: 209
Reputable Member
 

Warning! White race to become extinct!

:rolleyes:


All across the nation,
Such a strange vibration,
People in motion.
There's a whole generation,
With a new explanation,
People in motion, people in motion!

For those who come to San Francisco,
Be sure to wear some flowers in your hair,
And if you come to San Francisco
Summertime will be a love-in there.

 
Posted : 27/05/2006 6:31 pm
Aryan Lord
(@aryan-lord)
Posts: 4347
Famed Member
 

What a wheelbarrow load of horseshit.

Darwinism run amok.

I cant believe these sycophants are allowed to call themselves professionals.

Can you imagine dark southern european looking women clenching all the muscles in their bodies while clicking their heals together trying to struggle to change their genes to "evolve" more disirable blonde hair and other associated traits!

FUCK, THAT IS SO DAMN FUNNY. And this horse shit passes for theory! Unfuckingbelievable.

--------

Now let me just tell people and the "scientist" if he happens to read this, how blondes came into being.

You listening?

Ok,

Here goes.

Caucasoid people happened to produce one baby who had a mutated gene that produced less malanine than average Caucasian type people, that blonde baby grew up and produced offspring, who's offspring spread this mutated gene even farther. Eventually, people who carried this mutated gene got isolated from the dark haired population, and produced blonds every pregnancy, since all they had was blonde genes.

Duh!

Struggled to evolve genes!!!!! L-O-L!!!!!

I guess this "scientist" is trying to get us to believe that Mestizoes or Mulattoes can become blonde themselves if they just HOPE hard enough!!!!!!!

The more likely explanation is that blond hair and blue/grey/green eyes are the norm for the Aryan race and are indicative of a seperate descent and development.


http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/

 
Posted : 28/05/2006 3:44 am
Page 2 / 2
Share: