I'm indifferent to Ike, so I have no stake in trying to defend him, but I don't see any strong evidence that he was a kike. That yearbook entry is written in a jesting manner. "Swedish-Jew" sounds like a nickname. He could've earned that nickname for reasons other than his family tree. I wouldn't infer that he was a Jew from that any more than I would infer he was Spanish when they call him "Senor Dwight David Eisenhower."

I have tried to do some research of Eisenhowers possible jewish roots here in Sweden. But I haven't found anything.

Except that his wife, Mamies, maternal grandparents were Swedes that emigrated to America. And they were very typical emigrants: poor peasants = 100 % guaranteed non-jewish.

According to this site he was.

http://judicial-inc.biz/Hopie_ike.htm

According to this site, Ike was a Presbyterian.

http://www.nndb.com/people/111/000024039/

It seems that if you keep on digging and go far enough back into European ancestry, you can probably find at least some kind of weak Jewish link to most everyone. Well, not to most everyone, but to a whole bunch of Europeans in some tiny way or the other.

Hell, even my great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great grandfather may have had a third cousin who had a great aunt that was married to a third cousin that was Jewish. Who really knows?

According to this site, Ike was a Presbyterian.

http://www.nndb.com/people/111/000024039/

It seems that if you keep on digging and go far enough back into European ancestry, you can probably find at least some kind of weak Jewish link to most everyone. Well, not to most everyone, but to a whole bunch of Europeans in some tiny way or the other.

Hell, even my great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great grandfather may have had a third cousin who had a great aunt that was married to a third cousin that was Jewish. Who really knows?

Sure, I can agree with you in general.

The Skunk, who produces the multimedia works at judicialinc, is something of a performance artist. He constantly accuses people of being Jewish. It's ridiculous for example to believe his spurious claim that Ben Klassen was Jewish when there are VNNers who know from personal knowledge that he was not. That Eisenhower had Jewish history or not, would certainly be relevant however, as it was that Churchill had Jewish ancestry, when we consider the awful murder of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF GERMAN CIVILIANS by the Allied Strategic bombing of such locations as Dresden and Hamburg, and the awful subjugation of Germany after the war. Would you agree Martinet?

Maybe Skunk will chime in on this as he has before. He's a registered user here.

Whether Eisenhower was a Jew or not, one thing is certain, his name will forever be synonymous with the worst infamy.
It really boogles the mind that someone could conduct mass murder on such a scale all for the dubious title of president.

Sure, I can agree with you in general.

The Skunk, who produces the multimedia works at judicialinc, is something of a performance artist. He constantly accuses people of being Jewish. It's ridiculous for example to believe his spurious claim that Ben Klassen was Jewish when there are VNNers who know from personal knowledge that he was not. That Eisenhower had Jewish history or not, would certainly be relevant however, as it was that Churchill had Jewish ancestry, when we consider the awful murder of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF GERMAN CIVILIANS by the Allied Strategic bombing of such locations as Dresden and Hamburg, and the awful subjugation of Germany after the war. Would you agree Martinet?

Maybe Skunk will chime in on this as he has before. He's a registered user here.

We've got too many people running around accusing everyone of being a "jew" as it is; we really don't want to encourage that sort of thing. It makes us look like lunatics.

Not that I want to let Jews off the hook, but it's hardly necessary to invoke alleged Jewish ancestry to explain the actions of men like Eisenhower, Churchill, etc. Look at what completely gentile whites did to the South during the Civil War and Reconstruction; look what the British did to the Boers. Allied treatment of Germans in WWI and WWII might have been extreme, but it was not unprecedented, and it was following a pattern of escalating breakdown of intra-white civility during wartime. Jews might have encouraged this, but for the most part it was whites who did the actual dirty work, and there's no need to assume any of them had a "jew in the woodpile" ancestry-wise.

In the case of Eisenhower, we have what someone (Patton? MacArthur?) called a glorified clerk, always more sensitive to the demands of those in power rather than first and foremost a fighting general. It's a natural thing for someone like him to magically rise to the top in WWII, in what was of necessity an intensely politically challenging command, and not primarily a fighting command. No need to invoke Jewish ancestry; Eisenhower is a type of officer who has always existed (although he's far a far more common "type" nowadays than formerly).

My source of allegation of Churchill's partial Jewishness is David Irving btw, vol 2 of his biography of same.

My source of allegation of Churchill's partial Jewishness is David Irving btw, vol 2 of his biography of same.

Right, but does anyone really believe Churchill would have behaved differently is this were not so? Or that someone else like Churchill would not have acted similiarly in similar circumstances, without having a Jewish ancestor somewhere?

Right, but does anyone really believe Churchill would have behaved differently is this were not so? Or that someone else like Churchill would not have acted similiarly in similar circumstances, without having a Jewish ancestor somewhere?

that a socalled conservative like Churchill would hang in there on a disastrous war that predictably lead to the collapse of Germany, the rise of Soviet might, and the COLLAPSE OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE as well, has always perplexed me and yes, I find a Jewish mother suspect.

Eisenhower, to me is less offensive than "Winnie the Sod" though surely there would have been NO civil rights era without Eisenhower's interstate highway system. Think about it.

-- Sod like sodden, soaked, drunk-- not sodomite-- I would have made him for more of a catcher than a pitcher-- "Winnie the Sod the Catamite"

Eisenhower, to me is less offensive than "Winnie the Sod" though surely there would have been NO civil rights era without Eisenhower's interstate highway system. Think about it.

I have always had suspicions about the Interstate act of 1956 and this bit of information has suddenly piqued my curiosity. I've got some thoughts about it that I'm going to get down on writing here before too long.

that a socalled conservative like Churchill

Churchill bounced back and forth between conservative and liberal parties. Churchill wasn't a "conservative" except in the sense that he wanted the British empire to exist in the same sense that a small boy wants his toy soldiers to exist.

would hang in there on a disastrous war that predictably lead to the collapse of Germany, the rise of Soviet might, and the COLLAPSE OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE as well, has always perplexed me and yes, I find a Jewish mother suspect.

Right, except that Winnie had the vast majority of the British elite go along with his program, most of whom never had any Jewish "taint" in their ancestry, as well of course the rest of the British population. The members of the British elites who opposed Churchill after 1939 were far too few in number to matter. So again, we have no need to see any necessary connection between Jewish ancestry and white suicidal policies.

IMO if you want to see the Jewish puppet strings controlling Churchill, it's not to be found in his ancestry but in the fact that he was broke and needed money after the 1929 stock market crash. Churchill stopped talking about Jews and communism and started sounding the alarm about Hitler some time after he was "saved" financially by Jew-know-who. This isn't something that can be documented with 100% certainty, but the signs are there. In that sense Churchill was acting just like any other gentile politician, and no need to invoke Jewish ancestry to explain his behavior.

Eisenhower, to me is less offensive than "Winnie the Sod" though surely there would have been NO civil rights era without Eisenhower's interstate highway system. Think about it.

Eisenhower was a war criminal by his own, post-Nuremburg standards]
-- Sod like sodden, soaked, drunk-- not sodomite-- I would have made him for more of a catcher than a pitcher-- "Winnie the Sod the Catamite"

I believe I read something once about Churchill "experimenting" with homosexuality, but I've forgotten where I read it. It was some offhand comment he made when still young that someone wrote down. I think he ran around a bit with the bohemian/Bloomsbury type of crowd back then.

Churchill was also a big fan of using poison gas, whether against Iraqis or Germans. Hitler had experienced the stuff first hand and was not a fan of chemical warfare.

Strangly, Eisenhower seemed to hate the military. He was my CinC for a while. Rank was nearly frozen in the lower levels by his admin. Guys wrote their folks from overseas to go to Sears and get handtools to send them so they could do their work.(F100s) What a man. But this is minor stuff compared to his expressed hatred of the German: His designation of POW's as "Former Enemy Combatants" or somesuch to jewishly bypass the Geneva Convention, and his mass murder of them that is still unknown by by most. War criminal as president. Makes a little Clinton fellatio trivial, doesn't it? But, in my ignorance, I voted for the guy - "Republican", you know.

Oh, I wanted to ask how the national highway thing mentioned ties in to the "civil rights" thing? Still learning.

Blockheads, please note - The only way you can know if someone is jewish is if you get information on their parents and grandparents. Names? Jewish racial characteristics? Were they known to be jews? Where were they christened/baptized? What church were they married in? What sort of lifestyle did they lead? If they were carrying on in New York like Jews, they probably were Jews.