Food for thought:

Sumerian = Sumaryan
Tocharian = Tocharyan

The Sumerians (of Mesopotamia) were one of the first advanced white civilizations.

A genetic meritocratic nobility. Sounds good to me.

And of course, 'Iran' though there were undoubtedly a few more Aryans there long ago, when it was Persia, before the Arabs pushed through.

I believe possibly we should shy away from that term is its embarrased continously. The word reminds me of a scrawny mid western american teen with a thin paki-like mustache, glasses, and acne, at a defunct neo-nazi rally.

There are some ugly pieces of shit in our race, why they all decided to become racially aware is beyond me. I personally think a lot of them have nothing to live for so they turn to the color of their skin and of course get interested in the nazis. The idea of wiping out another race of people is appealing to a frustrated and depressed person who has lost all hope and meaning in life. And because the Jews have tremendous power here, since they've failed in this country and are unhappy as individuals they automatically think the Jews are the root cause and reason why they drive a truck to work everyday or are a low life department of transportation worker.

A lot of these people are humliation for us, they are white niggers.

On the topic, you could earn the title of an aryan through shear noble acts even if you werent blonde haired, blue eyed, tall, and muscular.

I see what you mean, Fonz; it doesn't have much "sales appeal" --but name one single pro-White word or symbol that does, in our post-teevee world?!

"Majority" would be good, but it could not be more false in a worldwide context, (soon to be false in ANY national context as well, so they say) and keeps everyone comfortably asleep. I guess "White" will have to do--but its decidedly un-pee-sea "gasp factor" is just about as high as that of "Aryan."

Aryan means honorable or noble, but you don't see that mentioned here. Apparently the Jews hate the word as much as they do the people.

Ar·y·an ( P ) Pronunciation Key (âr-n, r-)
n.
Indo-Iranian. No longer in technical use.
A member of the people who spoke the parent language of the Indo-European languages. No longer in technical use.
A member of any people speaking an Indo-European language. No longer in technical use.
In Nazism and neo-Nazism, a non-Jewish Caucasian, especially one of Nordic type, supposed to be part of a master race.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[From Sanskrit rya-, noble, Aryan.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ary·an adj.
Word History: It is one of the ironies of history that Aryan, a word nowadays referring to the blond-haired, blue-eyed physical ideal of Nazi Germany, originally referred to a people who looked vastly different. Its history starts with the ancient Indo-Iranians, Indo-European peoples who inhabited parts of what are now Iran, Afghanistan, and India. Their tribal self-designation was a word reconstructed as *arya- or *rya-. The first of these is the form found in Iranian, as ultimately in the name of Iran itself (from Middle Persian rn (ahr), “(Land) of the Iranians,” from the genitive plural of r, “Iranian”). The variant *rya- is found unchanged in Sanskrit, where it referred to the upper crust of ancient Indian society. These words became known to European scholars in the 18th century. The shifting of meaning that eventually led to the present-day sense started in the 1830s, when Friedrich Schlegel, a German scholar who was an important early Indo-Europeanist, came up with a theory that linked the Indo-Iranian words with the German word Ehre, “honor,” and older Germanic names containing the element ario-, such as the Swiss warrior Ariovistus who was written about by Julius Caesar. Schlegel theorized that far from being just a designation of the Indo-Iranians, the word *arya- had in fact been what the Indo-Europeans called themselves, meaning something like “the honorable people.” (This theory has since been called into question.) Thus “Aryan” came to be synonymous with “Indo-European,” and in this sense entered the general scholarly consciousness of the day. Not much later, it was proposed that the original homeland of the Indo-Europeans had been in northern Europe. From this theory, it was but a small leap to think of the Aryans as having had a northern European physiotype. While these theories were playing themselves out, certain anti-Semitic scholars in Germany took to viewing the Jews in Germany as the main non-Aryan people because of their Semitic roots; a distinction thus arose in their minds between Jews and the “true Aryan” Germans, a distinction that later furnished unfortunate fodder for the racial theories of the Nazis.

[Buy it]
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

aryan

Ar"yan ([aum]r"yan or [a^]r"[i^]*an), a. Of or pertaining to the people called Aryans; Indo-European; Indo-Germanic; as, the Aryan stock, the Aryan languages.

Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.

aryan

Ar"yan ([aum]r"yan or [a^]r"[i^]*an), n. [Skr. [=a]rya excellent, honorable; akin to the name of the country Iran, and perh. to Erin, Ireland, and the early name of this people, at least in Asia.] 1. One of a primitive people supposed to have lived in prehistoric times, in Central Asia, east of the Caspian Sea, and north of the Hindoo Koosh and Paropamisan Mountains, and to have been the stock from which sprang the Hindoo, Persian, Greek, Latin, Celtic, Teutonic, Slavonic, and other races; one of that ethnological division of mankind called also Indo-European or Indo-Germanic.

Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.

aryan

adj : of or relating to the former Indo-European people; "Indo-European migrations" [syn: Indo-European, Indo-Aryan, Aryan] n 1: (according to Nazi doctrine) a non-Jewish Caucasian person of Nordic descent [syn: Aryan] 2: a member of the prehistoric people who spoke Proto-Indo European [syn: Aryan, Indo-European]

i have a French-German dictionnary and guess what? The word "Aryan" is not even listed...But 5 words later and you have "asiatique" = asian.
First they erase us from books...

Food for thought:

Sumerian = Sumaryan
Tocharian = Tocharyan

The Sumerians (of Mesopotamia) were one of the first advanced white civilizations.

It was Waddell, a sinologist, who wrote a book 80 or so years ago calling the Sumerians Sumer-Aryans. I am not sure how well founded that is. Sumer actually antedates the fanning out of the Aryans from their theorized homeland in eastern Europe by quite a few centuries. I don't think there's any disputing that the Sumerians were a Caucasoid people (characterized as brunet in some books), but making them literally Aryans is anachronistic.

Any dictionaries still listing it will very likely tie it to e-vile Nazis.
I personally like 'Aryan.' But people can't be shocked too much all at once-- first you have to show them 'what' before you can discuss 'why'. Not unlike an AmRen-SF-VNN evolution.

It was Waddell, a sinologist, who wrote a book 80 or so years ago calling the Sumerians Sumer-Aryans. I am not sure how well founded that is. Sumer actually antedates the fanning out of the Aryans from their theorized homeland in eastern Europe by quite a few centuries. I don't think there's any disputing that the Sumerians were a Caucasoid people (characterized as brunet in some books), but making them literally Aryans is anachronistic.

I have his books, they are some of the most excellent and detailed accounts of ancient Mesopotamia. He provides evidence on every aspect - the language, artifacts, the fact that they had lapis lazuli (blue) in their sculptures of themselves, and most interestingly that King Sargon of Akkad called himself a "Goth."

Another book, written by Habberman gives evidence of an "Eastern Europe" origin in the Pamir Plateau (blonde/blue Tocharians were discovered close to this region)

The Aryans were not a class of Indo-Europeans; Indo-European is simply the word that has replaced Aryan in technical usage. The Indo-Europeans and the Aryans are one and the same.

To be an Aryan is in no way something that is earned. A nigger cannot earn Aryanity. To assume that the excellence of the Aryan implies that one must show excellence in deeds to be considered Aryan, is to introduce a modern attitude into an ancient idea. One is well-born or one is not, and deeds cannot change it.

I am also seeing some very bad, politically loaded dictionary definitions of the word. Go to an at least 70-year-old dictionary if you don't want to read Jewish-influenced bullshit. I have a 110-year-old dictionary here, The American Encyclopaedic Dictionary, W.P. Conkey Company, Chicago 1896 (entered into the office of the Librarian of Congress by Ogilvie Publishing in 1894). Here is its definition of Aryan:

Ar-y-an, Ar-i-an, a. & s. [In Sansc. Arya (as subst.) = (1) a tribe or nation--the Aryas; (2) in later Sanscrit (as adj.) = noble, of good family. India was called Arya-avarta = the country of the Aryas. These Aryans were invading Brahmans, Kshatriyas (warriors), and Vaisyas (merchants); while the aborigines of India were called in the Vedas Dasyus. In later Sanscrit Arya specially meant the third or merchant class, the most numerous of the three, whence it came to stand for the whole nation. It seems to mean one who plows or tills, and to be connected with the Latin word aro = to plow, to till. It was opposed to Tura, in Sanscrit meaning (1) as adj. = swift; (2) as substan. = nomad. [TURANIAN.] In Zend airya (adj.) means venerable, and (substan.) the Persian people. (The Persians and the Indian Aryans were originally the same nation.) Persia was called by Hellenicus, who wrote before Herodotus, Aria. Herodotus says that the Medes called themselves Arii. In the cuneiform inscriptions Darius denominates himself Ariya. Many other words, ancient and modern, appear to contain the term, as Iran (Persia); Armenia; Aria, in Thrace; the Arii, in Germany; and even our own Erin and Ireland. (See Max Müller on the Science of Language, 4th ed., pp. 246-255.) The word has sometimes been written Arian; but Aryan is more correct, besides having the great advantage of discriminating the term from Arian, pertaining to the Presbyter of Alexandria, so prominent in discussions regarding the doctrine of the Trinity.]
A. As adjective:
I. Philol. & Ethnol.: Belonging to the great family of human languages described below.
Aryan Family of Languages: A great family of languages, sometimes though rarely, and not quite accurately, called Japhetic; more frequently designated as the Indo-European or Indo-Germanic family of tongues. They have reached a higher development than those of the second great family, the "Semitic," better described as the Syro-Arabian family, and are far in advance of the next one--that comprising the Turanian tongues. [LANGUAGES.]Like the Syro-Arabian forms of speech, they are inflectional [INFLECTIONAL.]; while those of Turanian origin are only agglutinate. [AGGLUTINATE.] Max Müller separates the Aryan family of languages primarily into a Southern and a Northern division. The former is subdivided into two classes: (1) the Indic, and (2) the Iranic; and the latter into six: (1) the Celtic, (2) the Italic, (3) the Illyric, (4) the Hellenic, (5) the Windic, and (6) the Teutonic. [See these words.] (Max Müller: Science of Language, vol. ii., p.411.) It is often said that Sanscrit , spoken by the old Brahmans, is the root of all these classes of tongues. It is more correct to consider it as the first branch, and assume the existence of a root not now accessible to direct investigation. As an illustration of the affinity among the Aryan tongues, take the common word daughter. It is in Sw. dotter; Dan. datter, Dut. dochter; Ger. tochter; O.H. Ger. tohtar; Goth. dauhtar; Lith. duktere; Gr. thygater; Armenian dustr; Sansc. duhitri; the last word signifying, primarily, "milkmaid," that being the function, in the early Brahman or Aryan household, which the daughter discharged. Not only are the roots of very many words akin throughout the several Aryan tongues, but (a more important fact) so also are the inflections. Thus the first person singular of a well-known Latin verb is do; Gr. didomi; Lith. dumi; Old Slav. damy; Zend dadhami; Sansc. dadami; and the third person sing. present indic. of the substantive verb is in English is, Goth. ist, Lat. est, Gr. esti, Sansc. asti.

". . . there exists in India a sort of rivalry between the Aryan languages, or rather between the three principal ones--Hindi, Marathi, and Bengali--each considering itself superior to the others."--Beames: Compar. Gram. Aryan Lang. of India, vol i. (1872); Introduction, p.31.

II. Ethnology:
1. Gen.: Pertaining to the old race speaking the primeval Aryan tongue [A.], or any of the numerous forms of speech which have sprung from it. The ancestors of most modern Europeans lived together as one people, speaking the primeval Aryan tongue, in Central Asia, and apparently near the Pamir steppe. Their separation took place at so remote a period that, while they seem to have known gold, silver, and copper, they were unacquainted with iron, the name of which is different in all the leading Aryan tongues. (Max Müller, Science of Language, vol. ii., p. 258.)
2. Spec.: The Aryan race which invaded India at a period of remote antiquity, possibly 1700 B.C., and still remains the dominant Hindoo race there.
B. As substantive: The race or races described under A., II. (q.v.).

Unfortunately, Hadding, this will not bring an end to the "Aryan" debate. This should be the definition of what an Aryan is, but alas, there are too many illierate assholes out there who will never read this, or if they do, will simply ignore it.
Meds are real Aryans! No! Nords are true Aryans!
When the revolution comes, it will not be the modern day WNs who will be calling the shots. Keep that in mind.

There are some Caucasoid populations in Europe that are not strictly speaking Aryan but fortunately they are not so different that mixing would ruin the Aryan stock as was the case in India. Mediterraneans and Brünns and Borrebys may or may not be strictly Aryan but they damned sure aren't Dravidians and we can be thankful for that.

Great word, but we ought to keep it among ourselves for private, sacred use. Indo European is the prefered term for the language group and Caucasion the wider race including Asiatics which are endlessly debated here, and White the prefered name for the group of us of shared race and common European ancestry. WHITE works well for most purposes.

Metzger has suggested, and I agree, that Aryan be reserved by us as a title of honor for those who have earned it.

The Aryan tribe is now non-existent, having been swallowed up by the greater white gene pool. However, I still think it is entirely appropriate that we use the word in reference to ourselves, perhaps only within our circles. Aryan meant noble. This group looked at themselves relative to their contemporaries and decided they were superior and deserved to rule. This is the very epitome of the master morality which is being revived within our circles to crush the Jewish slave morality once and for all.

Mr Hadding has stated Mediterraneans, Brunns and Borrebys are non-Aryan. I'm sorry but I dont know who the Brunns and Borrebys are although I think they sound a wee bit like hobbits. Sorry, thats supposed to be funny. I'd love to know. But to continue, I would say that Gypsies are certainly not Aryan nor are Jews; nor are the Saami nor the Basque, but to put these groups on a level with Mediterraneans is incorrect. You might as well count out the Slavs too because they have a remote incidence of Asiatic ancestry.

if you want to exclude the occasional Greek-Turk hybrid, fine. I dont question that. if you want to exclude the occasional moroccan-spaniard hybrid fine. Hybrid is hybrid. Surely during the occupation of Sicily prior to its liberation by the Normans a little bit of Saracen blood crept in and maybe a few Italians we know here and there show it more than others. Though I know a few of these that have been fast friends and came up very reliably in personal conflict with racial aliens of undeniable difference.

What I would not consider fine is calling the native Mediterranean stock non-Aryan. I do not think that is correct and my opinion is informed by some reading from the pre-Boasian phsical anthropology. One example is William Morris' "The Aryan Race." Morris clearly includes Mediterraneans as Aryans and he attributes the difference in coloration to hybridization with the darker hued indigenous pre-Aryans of Europe such as the Etruscans and Myceneans. Considering the Doric invasion of Greece was, oh, 4000 years ago, I'd suggest it's pretty foolish to cry over this spilt milk now.