Here is a fascinating article: "How Venice Rigged the First, And Worst, Global Financial Collapse" (http://www.schillerinstitute.org/fid_91-96/954_Gallagher_Venice_rig.html). I read it many and many times.
You will find the situation of 650 years ago is so similar to the present one. Jews control the most dangerous weapons such as the Federal Reserve System and the global GOLD market.

"The Phonecians and the Philistines were the same people and the country of Palestine (Philistia) is even today named after them."

That's bullshit. Phoenicians spoke pretty much the same language as Jews (Canaanite), dressed in the same manner, had the same habits. Philistines were descendants of Sea Peoples (Micenians and Pelasgians from Aegean Basin who plundered the Near East after the Trojan War). From them, Phoenicians learnt the art of navigation.

Listen to Aherne. He's a Consultant when it comes to Semitic understandings. I've been lurking at his posts for some time, and this guy knows what he's talking about!

Those Jews who still wished to remain true to the faith of their fathers were protected by the Church itself from compulsory conversion. There was no change in this policy even later, when the pope called for the support of the Carolingians in protecting his ideal kingdom with their temporal power. The Jews had Europe in his pocket till' 1933. The rise of national-socialism.

Actually, the Jews began to gain control of Europe during Roman times at least by 200 BC they had made important inroads into Roman political and business processes. While they hated the Romans and Greeks, they were always quick to do moneylending and moneychanging with them since they could profit from the swindle. Bribery and blackmail is an old Jewish tradition that they used successfully on the Roman senators and nobility. And since the Jews controlled the trade in such luxuries as spices, perfumes, incense, pearls, gold, ivory, gem stones, purple dye and aromatic woods through the trade routes of Arabia and those passing through Babylon from India, they were in the prime postion to have access to all of the top Roman families, businessmen and politicians. As the monopolist slave traders in the region, they could supply sex slaves of either gender to any Roman Senator who had had too much wine and was a prime mark for blackmail. And because the Jews controlled the exchange ratio of silver to gold between the Middle East and India, they were the prime traders in gold and silver and could amass huge fortunes through the precious metals swindle.

By the time of Nero, the Jews had a Jewess as the wife of Nero and were able to blame the Jewish arson of Rome on the Christians which resulted in the slaughter of Christians throughout the Empire and in the Colleseums. Christianity was a threat to the Jews primarily because it took away their chosen people myth and preached forgiveness of debts. And if there is anything that a moneylender hates, it is foregiveness of debts.

The Christian Goths controlled all of Spain and although the Moors invaded in 712, the Jews had been accused for many years previous to that time of being spies for the Moors. So, there is little doubt that the Goths knew of Jewish treachery well before the actual invasion. And it is standard proceedure for the Jews to negotiate special priveledges for themselves with their allies for treason well delivered. As a reward for their treachery, the Moors granted the Jews special tax breaks, special political offices, and hired the Jews as tax collectors to punish the remaining Gothic Christians with unbearable taxes. And because they were Jews, the Jews abused all of these privileges by amassing fortunes, promoting each other to high office above the Moors, and generally being the asses and devils that they are. So much so, that the Moors later had a few pogroms of their own against the swindling and treacherous Jews.

The Jews to this day consider their habitation of Spain during the Moorish occupation as a "Golden Age of Judaism". They had been rewarded with farms, political office, trade concessions, tax breaks, forgiveness of military duty, and they used all of these positions to raise themselves above the Moors and to enrich themselves. They were able to latch onto the necks of their hosts until the Christians retook Spain and the Jews were finally expelled by Ferdinand and Isabella in 1492. On this date, some of these Sepharidic (Spanish) Jews moved to Amsterdam where among other things they set up the Dutch East India company with which to ravage Asia]

Wow thats a lot of info there, what books did you get those stories from? I don't doubt most if not all of it is right on the mark, just wondering where you got the info because it sounds like a great read.

 

It is impossible to provide a date. During Middle Ages, Jews may have held enormous financial influence, but they could never do anything more than influence others. In the end, they were at the mercy of corrupt feudal lords, who could very well turn a blind eye to massacres, while in the same time dwell on their loans for the benefit of their vicious habits. It was customary to arrange anti-jewish revolts every time they could no longer pay their debts.

In modern times, Jewish power has grown in direct relation to the loss of their competitors' cohesion. This loss of cohesion is masked by a myriad of newly formed "identities", all devoid of substance. During 19th century, it was fashionable to be a nationalist: that is to glorify your tribe in all but the most disgusting ways. This apparent outburst of identity coincided with a more significant event: as ethnic traditions were leveled by modernisation, belonging to a tribe became merely a matter of language (and race, to a lesser extent). Thus a Jew, by virtue of being a French citizen and speaker of French language, was "just a Frenchman". In addition, the abolition of feudalism forged another class-based society where elites enjoyed their powers while masses were thrown the bone of "ethnic pride" to chew. Elites despised masses, masses believed the rhetorics of agitators who waved their victim status. This translates into another root of division that Jews were to capitalize.

Jews, however, experienced a opposite trend. Using religion as an unifying factor, Jews retained their distinctiveness and attempted to shield themselves away as much as possible from the overpowerful phenomena of cultural leveling and class sensibilities. Even though defections were common (more common than in any other age), they remained a block and for the first time in their history, the policy of emancipation gave them a right to become directly involved into politics, assemble parties and create lobying groups.

Then Jews could use their strong financial backing to demand endless concessions from the states they were parasitizing and thus amount more and more influence for their personal and ethnic benefits. This reminds the informed observer of viruses who disband organisms infinitely more complex and infinitely greater than they are simply by staying low, fending off host's defense system and relentlessly attacking its vital organs. In countries where their presence was noticeable they couldn't achieve any power by democratic means simply because hosts were so well aware of their deadly nature (Russia, Poland, Romania). In France and Britain, where few people ever saw the Jew and his modus operandi, it was possible to advance semitically correct agendas without causing too much fuss on the Jewish ethnicity of those "progressives".

Thus Jewish power is essentially a modern phenomena, caused by a number of factors, the root ones being:
- hosts' diseased defense systems
- exceptional parasitical cohesion (focusing relentlessly towards same goals)
- bad luck (Hitler lost)

Thus Jewish power is essentially a modern phenomena, caused by a number of factors, the root ones being:
- hosts' diseased defense systems [this is blaming the victim for the Jews' parasitism]
- exceptional parasitical cohesion (focusing relentlessly towards same goals) [this is allowing the Jews to be normal parasites rather than the real devils that they are]
- bad luck (Hitler lost) [and no, Hitler did not lose because his ideas and ideals are eternally present for the world to follow]

It is difficult to argue with the confused. So I won't argue with you].