Our descent into judeo-egalitarian hell began with the Age of Enlightenment, which was ushered in by England's Glorious Revolution in 1688. That revolution gave birth to the first consitutional monarchy, the first central bank and the first bill of rights. It is the root of every branch of judeo-Marxist degeneracy that is gripping our civilization today.

Now I've already proven in this blog entry that the Glorious Revolution was financed by jews--that is, by the Suassos, an enormously wealthy (and today completely unknown) Sephardic banking dynasty stationed in Holland at the time--and that one of the first governors of the Bank of England was Moses Mendes da Costa, a Sephardic jew related to the Suassos.

In the same entry I also prove how jewish financiers were the backers of practically every major conflict in the 18th century, culminating in the French Revolution and the Revolutionary Wars. At the beginning of the 19th century, by the end of the Napoleonic Wars, all of Europe, aside from Russia, was officially owned by jewish bankers.

All of the above is indisputable. I'll debate anyone who disagrees with me, and I'll be sure to back my arguments with credible citations.

My question, however, is not concerned with who financed the collapse of Western Civilization, but rather who introduced the destructive, egalitarian, "enlightened" zeitgeist. First the idea must be born, and only then can it proceed to be financed into existence.

Were the Founding Fathers, for example, servants of the Jew or simply Holy-Babble-thumping white-skinned egalitarians? Ben Franklin was the president of the first abolitionist organization in the US, the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery and for the Relief of Free Negroes Unlawfully Held in Bondage. The rest of the Fathers were also all abolitionists. They knew that negroes would eventually be freed, if not in a decade, then in two, or three, or four. They knew that it was literally just a matter of time and that any "conservatives", just like any "royalists" over in Europe, were swimming against a current that was increasing in strength with every passing day. They knew that liberty was on the horizon for the negro, and yet they chose to draft and enact some very powerful and very paleo-Marxist documents.

We can speak in a similar vein about the Charles I regicides who ended up being hanged, drawn and quartered, or about the French Revolution, the Terror and the Jacobins, most of whom ended up being guillotined.

Many of these men were willing to sacrifice their lives in the name of fighting monarchical and religious absolutism and promoting egalitarianism.

Indeed, if I were alive back then, I too would staunchly oppose both Church and Monarchy and perhaps even give my life in the name of something so beautiful and idealistic as "liberty, fraternity and equality". I am White, after all, and inherently egalitarian.

But who or what was it that lit the candle which enlightened (or "illuminated") Europe?

I always used to blame feminism on the Jew, but White men are the original founders of feminism, or what Schopenhauer calls "our old French ideas of gallantry and absurd veneration, that highest product of Christian-Teutonic stupidity."

Likewise I used to blame Marxism on the Jew, but this "ism" was merely the child of egalitarianism and the Age of Enlightenment, both of which, to all appearances, were also founded by White men.

The same can be said about almost every other destructive judeo-policy of our day.

So how and why did it happen? Why did European Man undergo such a diametric change in thought and philosophy at that particular point in history? Ancient Greece and Rome had their dictators, their slaves, their colonies, their poor, their bloodshed, yet such perverted egalitarian nonsense didn't rear its ugly head.

Does the change, then, have something to do with Christianity, or with Northern European blood, or with the subversive Talmudic Jew, or with something else altogether?