Any truth to the rumors that the neocons are on their way out in a second Bush term?

No, the neocons are expert shapeshifters and I have a feeling many will somehow cling on to ZOG like the parasites they are no matter which jew-supported candidate is in office. The Jew Perle has been around since the Reagan days and was agitating for war on iran when Clinton was in office. He's "resigned" now, but still weilds tremendous influence. But don't take my word aboyt the neocons- listen to son of the Father of Neoconservatism-

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38206

"If we have to make common cause with the more hawkish liberals and fight the conservatives, that is fine with me," William Kristol has told the New York Times.

The Weekly Standard editor added that the neoconservatives may just abandon the Right altogether and convert to neoliberalism.

Alluding to his father Irving's definition of a neoconservative as a liberal who has been mugged by reality, Kristol describes a neoliberal as a "neoconservative who has been mugged by reality in Iraq."

Ranking his political preferences, Kristol added, "I will take Bush over Kerry, but Kerry over Buchanan ... If you read the last few issues of the Weekly Standard, it has as much or more in common with the liberal hawks than with traditional conservatives."...

Bush is plunging the government into record debt and undermanned wars.

Send our surplus mexicans to die in Iraq and Iran, I dont give a shit.

Its beautiful.

Down with ZOG, by their own hand.

I used to think Kerry would be better just because he's a secret jew but after reviewing how Bush is destroying the country, I have to say, my vote is for Bush and his reckless destruction of the U.S. Goverment and Treasury.

A weakened ZOG is what we need to strive for.

I don't like the poll; it should include more candidates. If you think there are significant enough differences between Berry and Kush to discuss then you must have your head in the sand. Don't waste your time with those fuckers.

Peroutka has pledged to end all foreign aid to Israel, in addition to many other good things. Go with him.

I think it is a good question and a good poll. I voted Bush, simply because I think the ZOG's major flaw, hubris, is more likely to be unchecked under Bush than under Kerry. Kerry is dumb and a Jew slave; Bush is dumber, a rapture bunny, and full-force Insane.

In a way, I don't think either will much help the WN cause. We are too few, and the average Americano is more likely to go in any direction other than WN. With Bush in though, I suspect the anti-war sentiments will increase (explode) and the Green/Anti-War folks will begin to make a real impact. This, coupled with the ZOG's unrestrained willingness to suppress dissent, should make for fireworks.

If Kerry is elected, I suspect the economy will slightly improve, the liberals, idiots that they are, will nod off, and any cathartic episode will be posponed.

Actually, I have selfish reasons to back Kerry. I looked up the figures and job production is always (and I mean always) better under Democrats. Also, house prices are more stable. I need to sell my house within the next two years, and I need some well-employed yuppie to buy it, and give me a good price so that I can move somewhere where there are no yuppies.

No matter, I've decided that for the first time since 1966, I will stay home and not vote Tuesday. I may walk over to the middle school where I have voted since 1986, though. There is always a great spread of muffins and donuts on election day. I don't want to miss that.

Enkidu

Both are controlled by jews so its pointless voting for any of them

Vote Kerry and get bush and his war-mongering jews out of office.

If what you meant by WE is white people then I would have to vote for neither, how come that choice is not there?

If Nader is on the ballot here in NC (and I don't believe he is) I will vote for him. Otherwise, I will vote for Kerry for the following reasons.

I know that pro-white organizations always have a hard time growing under perceived Republican/conservative presidencies. It will be especially hard for us to get much traction if the Republicans can fully harness the "born-again" zealots for Israel throng. Although these people think of themselves as conservatives, they really are not. Problem is, most white people now understand the terms "conservative, Christian, Republican" to represent the opposition to all things bad for whites. That's clearly not the case.

So it's best for us if the Republicans lose with the born-agains -- and continue to lose with them. If they get desperate enough, they will have to take the gloves off and play the race card if they really want to unite and motivate the white voting masses.

Vote Kerry and get bush and his war-mongering jews out of office.

And put Kerry and his jew friends in office? I don't get it.

And put Kerry and his jew friends in office? I don't get it.

I was being sarcastic..which doesn't work very well in plain text.

A vote for either candidate is a vote for either side of the same kike coin.

All this tactical stuff way too complicated for me. Not worth voting, but I'm beginning to hope for kohn/Kerry solely on the basis of that fat-mouthed billionaire wife. The loose cannon could provide 4 years of entertainment not seen since...Clinton.

I'm not American, but I can see several advantages with either candidate.

Bush is bankrupting Amerikwa and helping foment anti-semitism worldwide.

But the election of Kohn might galvanize the white opposition. Plus Kohn will probably continue to follow Bush's failed Middle East policy that is causing a lot of Amerikwa's decline.

I don't like telling Americans how to vote, but I suggest that every American WN vote for Kohn out of contempt.

I will not vote as I no longer care to play children's games such as our present egalitarian "democracy".
This election will have no real impact on the long term welfare of our race, good or bad.
One candidate or the other might insignificantly hasten or prolong the time before the revival our race becomes a collective White goal.

Our activities shouldn't lose sight of this goal:
that our children's children will see a day where the leadership of their racial nation is determined by the most talented, creative, determined, passionate and rational and physically fit White men.

Now, if one of the candidates were able to get on TV and say to the public what Nixon said in private (see my signature quote), maybe that would be an election to vote in!

Leave the voting to the illegal aliens!
http://vdare.com/malkin/illegals_swing_vote.htm

The Illegal Alien Swing Vote

By Michelle Malkin

The right to vote is precious, the politicians preach. Our democracy hangs in the balance, the pundits screech.

Yes, but if we all value the sanctity of the voting process so highly, why is it that I’ve never once been asked to produce identification of any kind in the 16 years I’ve been a voter, from Ohio to California to Washington State to Maryland?

And why is it that we can’t protect our elections from people who have no right to vote, no right to be here, and no right to undermine our safety or sovereignty?

While unhinged Democrats spread fear about the alleged discriminatory disenfranchisement of American citizens, they have supported the indiscriminate enfranchisement of untold numbers of foreign outlaws—including suspected al Qaeda operatives and terrorist sympathizers.

Last week, the Columbus Dispatch reported that illegal alien Nuradin Abdi—the suspected shopping mall bomb plotter from Somalia—was registered to vote in the battleground state of Ohio by the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), a left-wing activist group. Also on the Ohio voting rolls: convicted al Qaeda agent Iyman Faris, who planned to sabotage the Brooklyn Bridge and had entered the country fraudulently from Pakistan on a student visa.[ "Long gone but still registered Ohio’s Election Day rolls include people who couldn’t—and shouldn’t—vote ,October 24, 2004, Jon Craig The Columbus Dispatch"]

In the battleground state of Florida, indicted terror suspect Sami Al-Arian illegally cast his ballot in a Tampa referendum in 1994 while his citizenship application was pending. He claimed the unlawful vote was the result of a "misunderstanding." State officials declined to prosecute.

You’ve heard about those satirical “10 out of 10 terrorists agree: Anybody But Bush” bumper stickers? There may be more truth to them than you think. John Fund, author of Stealing Elections: How Voter Fraud Threatens Our Democracy, reports that at least eight of the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers were eligible to vote in Virginia or Florida while they plotted to kill Americans.

What’s to stop the next foreign terrorist plotter from casting a tainted ballot in the nation he has sworn to destroy? Not much. According to the Franklin County Board of Elections, the Dispatch reports, the office simply “takes a person's word, that they're (sic) a U.S. citizen."

In the battleground state of Wisconsin, the story is the same for those who are responsible for registering other people to vote. Not only do we regularly do nothing to verify the citizenship of people voting, but we also shrug our shoulders at the citizenship status of election workers. I recently obtained a disturbing set of investigative reports from the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), outlining how the city of Racine neglects to ask deputy registrar applicants for identification or proof of citizenship.

FAIR’s investigation also alleges that a deputy registrar in Racine registered two individuals—one posing as an admitted illegal alien—and reportedly advised them to lie on their forms. The report notes that the deputy registrar—working for the open borders lobbying group, Voces de la Frontera—then gave the couple information on other illegal alien benefits, including employment rights and bank accounts.

Law enforcement officials in Wisconsin—which has been swamped with voter fraud shenanigans—have copies of the report, affidavits from the couple who dealt with the registrar, and recordings of their conversations. But no action, if any, is likely until after the Nov. 2 election.

Democrats at the state and federal levels have aggressively courted the illegal alien swing vote. The most-egregious example, of course, was the taxpayer-funded Citizenship USA program under the Clinton-Gore administration, which abandoned criminal background checks to naturalize 1.3 million immigrants (including scores of criminal alien felons) in time for the 1996 elections.

Ethnic and racial grievance groups, with backing from the likes of Hillary Clinton and Ted Kennedy, have forcefully opposed basic ID requirements at the polls. And they have armies of lawyers standing by to assist them. Responsible election officials who ask for proof of citizenship will be accused of “harassment” and “intimidation.” They will be accused of causing a “chilling effect”—never mind the corrosive effect of unchecked illegal alien voter fraud on law, order, and the integrity of our electoral system.

Political correctness cost us 3,000 lives on Sept. 11. It may cost us an election on Nov. 2.