I distribute them primarily to gain publicity for VNN. I realize that probably 95 out of 100 go into a trash can but hey what about the 5 that don't? Imagine what we could do with 5 activists recruited from each town that TAA does a distro in? TAAs are a vehicle, a means not an end. When I distributed in Danville Virginia for example with 2180 papers that generated a big front page story, a few days later an editorial (and a Rounder LTE) plus the local ABC station had a story. In combination with Lynchburg being done by Ron Doggett & Ironguard1940 the local ABC station ran more stories and conducted a phone interview with Glenn Miller. The interview ran on 3 different newscasts and he was allowed to get in some pretty good points. How much money would it cost VNN if you could even buy (which you can't) this kind of publicity? If you don't like TAA- f*ck off.:box:
Unknown punks like these don't come here to help WN, but to harm VNN. And loyal VNN'ers who pay the bills and do the work to move VNN forward, are sick of slick spin-artists convincing guests and new-bees not to help us.
And don't fool yourselves, these subversives are effective in casting doubts into the minds of many who otherwise would join the TAA Team. No matter how effective any project is in fact, it's easy to criticise by simply accentuating the negative aspects, while omitting the positive, thus causing many to think: "Why take a chance of wasting my money or labors?"
"A house divided against itself, cannot stand." Having enemies roaming freely here, is like having GD thieves living and roaming freely in your own home.
Constructive criticism is one thing. But constant, day after day, repetitions of the same old defeatist, demoralizing, and divisive anti-TAA hate propaganda is another.
The VNN opposition should be confined to VNN's opposition forum. Why else have the GD thing ??
RULE PROPOSAL: TAA content is open for criticism. The existance of TAA is not. Violators chunked into the hoosegow for 60 days or banned permanently.
Moderator(s): Do your duty. Chunk da punks.
Glenn's right, I was way out of line. I was half in the bag (I'm sure GM might relate to THAT).
I have never handed out a TAA but I relly wouldn't have a problem handing one out. I am the type of person who lies to have a 1 on 1 coversation with people to educate them about the jews and WN. Just this weekend I was talking to a person who had no idea about jews and the media and the horrible things that Israel has done and the true facts of the "holocaust" He seemed very interested after I got done talking. Thats what my approach is, educating young white people about the dangers of blacks and jews, and they listen!
The desire to remain racially pure is a proof of the vitality and good health of a race. -Adolf Hitler
Threads with TAA in their topics automatically become ACTIVISM threads, regardless of who originates them. Forum rules forbid bullshit, asinine, badmouthings on ACTIVISM threads.
Professor anti-TAA, and Dies Irae have clearly violated subject forum rule in this ACTIVISM thread.
A.E., enforce the rule. Chunk da punks.
Unless this rule is enforced, then every GD anti-VNN punk in cyber space can come here and start the same anti-TAA thread, and we'll have to explain again, again, and again, why we publish a WN newspaper. While these punks laugh their asses off at our waste of time and efforts in doing so.
Loyal TAA contributors and distributors want to advance TAA, not waste time and energy defending it's existance to every GD, teeny booper, irresponsible, anti-VNN asshole on the web.
Let them have their fun in the Hoosegow zoo, where their anti-VNNisms will be enjoyed by all.
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire
.......retracted
Ignorance of the law then retractions are no excuse.
Bitch slap this anti-TAA bitch into the zoo too, A.E., as another example to other would-be anti-TAA bitches feeling "froggy".
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire
There are a good deal of alleged WN's who seem to think that handing out TAA's is a worthy endeavor. Why is that? Isn't it just a little embarrassing to hand out these silly little publications that read like they were written by junior high schoolers?
Sadly, there are actually some adults well into their forties, or fifties even I believe, who seem to think that these "Aryan Alternative" papers are somehow "waking up" people.
Who are they waking up? Some backwater hilljacks who are "gonna git dem niggers, hyuk hyuk..."?
Good grief, what the hell is the matter with some of you? Are you really so bleak that this immature nonsense is somehow helpful to Whites? If so, I cannot see how saving Whites is worthwhile. Perhaps narrower goals, such as saving exceptional fellows such as myself should be sought, rather than all Whites. I don't think it's worthwhile saving any Whites who think TAA's are beneficial to Whites, divergence to the mean or not. Any Whites who proudly disseminate these TAA's are certainly no people that I want to be associated with, and I don't know any reasonably intelligent Whites who would not be embarrassed to be caught reading these silly little things that cannot help but strike any reasonably intelligent person as the making of Fischer Price's My First Toothless Clansman's Printing Press.
So, please do those of us with some class a favor and don't hand these things out. They're just plain embarrassing. Engage your brain, or at least have enough sense to heed the advice of somebody like me.
Folks who make a special effort to come to VNNF to spit on VNN projects must learn that they are only spitting into the wind. They would do better by creating their own WN forum, then creating their own tabloid, and, since their ideas are so superior, folks will naturally gravitate towards their success. What's the point of coming here, beating their chest and shitting all over Alex's efforts when they are so much better? Doesn't make sense.
[color="Red"]I'm so depressed about outsourcing I called the suicide hotline and got a call center in Pakistan. They got all excited and asked me if I could drive a truck.
My question is this, if not TAA, then what. Everyone with such "intelligence and class" as the one who started this thread must have better ideas. Well, what are they??? Easy to critic but hard to actually do, huh???
Gotta agree that most WN literature in general is tossed out in disgust by most people, but then I've never met anybody who recieved one piece of lit and was completely transformed. Its usually a process that takes a while and more information than one flyer or paper or conversation can provide immediatly. But when you put 'em all together you can get great results.
So anyway, where are these new ideas that will lead us to victory???
Let the critics speak. If its a good idea then I'm all for it, but don't come down harshly on others who approach things differently.
If all people want to do is come on boards like VNN and just shoot off at the mouth without offering any alternative solution, well, just get a damn life.
14/88
I'm a good ol' Rebel, yes I am
I won't be reconstructed and I don't give a damn.
The production values of the TAA are excellent. There just needs to be a lot more thought put into the content and message at times. If you look at trends in media-audiences today, there is a MASSIVE sense of disdain for the mainstream media due to it's consolidation and all the by-products of that consolidation: Fluff pieces, VNRs(basically adverts disguised as news stories), sloppy journalism, hoaxes(that get through because of sloppy journalism), punditry, and oversimplistic, one-sided reporting. At this time many intelligent people would flock to any media source that can prove itself to be just the opposite of these things. That means that we must do our best to check-facts(something pundits never heard of), minimize sensationalism, and get the story 110% right.
I read the last TAA and honestly I have to say it seems to be preaching to the choir in the sense that it seems like you would have to be pretty well familiar with the movement to understand precisely what it is saying. Also you would have to be pretty dedicated to forgive a couple blatant errors such as the 600 Million White men article. While WNs will forgive something like that, the public won't, and the enemy will zero in on that as "proof" that we lie to people. We owe our people far more than simply replacing the lies of Jews with lies of Aryans.
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!!
Well, I'll tell you my reasoning. True a lot of people throw them away. Some people don't bother to pick them up. Then again I have people tell me that they didn't know that anyone else had the same views they had. I don't try and indoctrinate anyone. When those papers fall into the right hands of a person that is looking to make a difference and find like minded people to join in the fight, it makes it worthwhile. If we have to make a case to change someones mind, they aren't worth the effort. If we can change a person's mind, someone else can too. A pro-White group, doesn't change people. We seek like minded individuals that are looking to unite with others that feel the same way. We open peoples eyes when they see some literature and say, "hey, these people think the same way I do." We are not in the brain washing business or the mind changing business. We are in the business of uniting the White race. There are some that will never see things the way we do and some that will always be against us. I have stirred up people with TAA. The majority don't like the idea that there are people left that can think for themselves and see things truthfully. If you don't like TAA, then throw it away and don't read it. But as long as it is published and as long as it remains our right to distribute literature, I will continue to let people know that there are others out there that share their opinion.
Because this thread was started from someone in L.A. I would agree. TAA is a waste of paper in this town, L.A. is done and I unfortunately live in this shit hole.....
I'm NOT a jew, I just play one on youtube....
.
Because this thread was started from someone in L.A. I would agree. TAA is a waste of paper in this town, L.A. is done and I unfortunately live in this shit hole.....
I lived there for almost three years and agree with you! But that was the late 1980's..
I like your way of thinkiing. You're acting both polite and brash, as you realize the tightrope of propriety you're now walking upon. Careful what you say, or over the edge you go. But then, you can't quite help yourself. For you, the TAA was something you might have thumbed through when you were eleven, but not any more. Now you want a serious and professional approach, one that you wouldn't be ashamed to be a part of. And I agree with you. Our kind are out there, it's just that we need to seek out and find each other.
TAA is currently printing issue number 4.
FOUR.
Let's give it some time to please everyone, shall we?
No one is stopping anybody who reads VNNF from creating their own newspaper, written the way they want.
In fact, I'm quite sure Linder/Miller would be happy to walk anyone through the process of a new tabloid start-up.
The more the merrier, and all that.
RE: emac
Well, I'll tell you my reasoning. True a lot of people throw them away. Some people don't bother to pick them up. Then again I have people tell me that they didn't know that anyone else had the same views they had. I don't try and indoctrinate anyone. [color="Red"]When those papers fall into the right hands of a person that is looking to make a difference and find like minded people to join in the fight, it makes it worthwhile. If we have to make a case to change someones mind, they aren't worth the effort. If we can change a person's mind, someone else can too. A pro-White group, doesn't change people. We seek like minded individuals that are looking to unite with others that feel the same way. We open peoples eyes when they see some literature and say, "hey, these people think the same way I do." We are not in the brain washing business or the mind changing business. We are in the business of uniting the White race. There are some that will never see things the way we do and some that will always be against us. I have stirred up people with TAA. The majority don't like the idea that there are people left that can think for themselves and see things truthfully. If you don't like TAA, then throw it away and don't read it. But as long as it is published and as long as it remains our right to distribute literature, I will continue to let people know that there are others out there that share their opinion.
Bravo!
All VNN’ers need to read what you’ve said here!
The ink of the learned is as precious as the blood of the martyr. For one drop of ink may make millions think.
By Dies Irae:
There are a good deal of alleged WN's who seem to think that handing out TAA's is a worthy endeavor. Why is that? Isn't it just a little embarrassing to hand out these silly little publications that read like they were written by junior high schoolers?
Does that type of flak mean T.A.A may be over the target?
By J.P. Slovjanski:
I read the last TAA and honestly I have to say it seems to be preaching to the choir in the sense that it seems like you would have to be pretty well familiar with the movement to understand precisely what it is saying
I never thought I would say this, but perhaps j.p. has a point.
Perhaps T.A.A needs to be dumbed down even further so that the mob of dullards and lemmings known as White society might actually grasp its meaning.
The debate about wheather or not these dullard-type Whites are even worth enlightening is for another time, and another thread, but to look at it another way, you don't kill a fly with a bazooka.
Big jew is master of the three-word-catch-phrase type of brain washing.
Just have a look through one of those supermarket tabloids and count how many of these 3-word-nuggets you are assaulted with before you reach the last page...
E.g.:
"Just say no"
"Just do it"
"Where U at?"
"I'm lovin' it"
"War on terror"
etc.
Maybe you should take a page from the filthy kikes' book and fight fire with fire.:box:
Perhaps slogans and catch phrases should be scattered throughout, T.A.A just as they are in the Weekly World News...
Only jew free slogans and catch-phrases, instead...
Some examples of this 3-word message making, as it applies to us might be :
"Keep it simple"
"Support White Nationalism"
"Blacks murder Whites"
"Don't date blacks"
"Un-school your kids"
etc.
I know that govt, and mega-corps use this tactic with huge success, so why not us?
I happen to be a huge fan of T.A.A. To me it's an enjoyable read, and the men who concieved and manifested it are Heroes in my book. True it may be a bit too much information for fully indoctrinated White lemmings to concieve, all at once, but any seed planted in a doubtful mind, is a plus for us.
When all is said and done, T.A.A is written for, about and in support of me; White guy, and anything written for, about and in support of White guy is an extremely rare find today. A collectors Item to be sure.
How can I not support it?
That's my 2 cents...
____________________________
THINK!!!
88
ACHTUNG JUDEN!!!
http://question911.com/links.php
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
"Which will you believe White Man, the trustworthy, innocent, upright, noble jew, or your own lying eyes and ears?"
-anonymous-
If you look at trends in media-audiences today, there is a MASSIVE sense of disdain for the mainstream media due to it's consolidation and all the by-products of that consolidation: Fluff pieces, VNRs(basically adverts disguised as news stories), sloppy journalism, hoaxes(that get through because of sloppy journalism), punditry, and oversimplistic, one-sided reporting. At this time many intelligent people would flock to any media source that can prove itself to be just the opposite of these things. That means that we must do our best to check-facts(something pundits never heard of), minimize sensationalism, and get the story 110% right.
I agree. That's what I would want to read if I was looking for an alternative to the jewspapers.
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion."
- Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist.