I am not talking about women replacing men is traditional male roles, I am simply talking about women not being kept from certain roles, in the rare case, that they are more than qualified to be in those roles. This would be quite different than how things are today, where standards are lowered to allow for the presence of women who should not be in those roles. It is also true that on a rare occassion not every single woman is cut out for that wife/mother role. Should a woman whose talents may lie elsewhere be forced into that role as her only option, when she might be more of a benefit doing something else? What if a certain woman would make a terrible mother, but be very good at something else(again rare, possibly, but it does exist) A society can not be operated on exceptions to the rule, but it also does not have to completely ignore those exceptions.

Madam Currie, Joan of arc, calamity Jane, &#8230]
Some ideas that float around, here and some of the anti-female hostility is also useful to the Jews.(I am not referring to you) There is also division in those attitudes.

And I don't think I have to be a feminist to find fault in words like "women pale in comparison to men" or "women have done nothing but destroy our society." And I would also have to wonder if those statements were made to win brownie points with some of the guys.

Well, well, meow to you too. Don’t be that way HG.
lol, to take offense to ‘women pale in comparison to men’ and ‘women have done nothing but destroy’, lol, well sorry. You ain’t going to hear everything ya want to hear from me sister. Truth is a tough thing sometimes.

Um, what is it that women have under their belts that make people travel in interest to look and see? Building the Empire State building, nope, men. Building the Golden Gate Bridge? Nope men. Going to the moon? Nope men. I could go on and on.

Let’s see, women ……..what have they gotten together and built?
I have some quilts make by a quilting bee.
We could hail Rosie, icon for dykes all over, but she really just came in and replaced the male labor while the men went to war. It is not like she invented anything.

.

Back to voting again:p Who was it that allowed niggers the "right' to vote. It certainly was NOT women.

http://www.edgate.com/elections/inactive/history_of_the_vote/

so while ALL white women, no matter what their position, were to inept to handle the responsibility of voting, some niggers were acceptable.

Quite annoying that niggers were even held in a higher regard by some, then white women.:box:

You should study your history a bit more HG. Christians and women were the main proponents behind the abolitionists’ movement The Grimke Sisters were main players. Freeing the slaves led to black men getting the vote before white women. Tsk, tsk, those pesky do gooder women. lol And after the black men got the vote, well, it was only right that women would follow. After freeing the slaves, the Grimke sisters worked on women rights.

You're talking to a "brick wall", Devere. The only contributions that bitch has ever made to WN is demoralization, division, misguidance, and confusion. And deliberately. A clever kike or kike-alike, and I couldn't care less which. Damages to the furtherance of our Cause and our Race are the same.

Well now. At least HG hasn't had mulatto offspring, run with Morris Dees or cooperate with the Great Satan now, has she? I'd say that in itself is a decent contribution to the "Cause", eh?

You should study your history a bit more HG. Christians and women were the main proponents behind the abolitionists’ movement The Grimke Sisters were main players. Freeing the slaves led to black men getting the vote before white women. Tsk, tsk, those pesky do gooder women. lol And after the black men got the vote, well, it was only right that women would follow. After freeing the slaves, the Grimke sisters worked on women rights.

I must say, that is a good point.

Well now. At least HG hasn't had mulatto offspring, run with Morris Dees or cooperate with the Great Satan now, has she? I'd say that in itself is a decent contribution to the "Cause", eh?

Well now, since you felt the need to get personal, why don't you start a new thread, state coherent allegations, and you and I'll go one on one, and I'll kick yo ass. Eh ??

(Watch it decline by slithering away).

You should study your history a bit more HG. Christians and women were the main proponents behind the abolitionists’ movement The Grimke Sisters were main players. Freeing the slaves led to black men getting the vote before white women. Tsk, tsk, those pesky do gooder women. lol And after the black men got the vote, well, it was only right that women would follow. After freeing the slaves, the Grimke sisters worked on women rights.

I am assuming a majority of those Christians were white men. To bring up a couple of women doesn't mean a whole lot to me. If it was white men who held all the real decision-making power, then they were the ones who were ultimately responsible for making those big decisions that resulted in niggers gaining the right to vote.

I am assuming a majority of those Christians were white men. To bring up a couple of women doesn't mean a whole lot to me. If it was white men who held all the real power, they were the ones who were ultimately responsible for making the big decisons that resulted in niggers gaining the right to vote.

Oh yes I forget,being raised within the femi zog you may not know of the time when women knew how to pleasantly work their pull in the bedroom with her husband. Tis the beauty many femi's thought of Hillary Clinton, no longer having to play the 'mrs. reagan' role. The First Lady's role in the politics and behind the scenes became out in the open with ol' Hillary. She wore the pants while Bill was pleasuring himself and selling us away to the chinese.

Many women worked on their husbands over the slave issue. Take an american woman's history class and they will discuss with pride their involvement of freeing the slaves.

But alas, since women had no right to vote, the man would pull the lever for the negro's right to vote. But of course the war, Lincoln...such a deep subject.

Many women worked on their husbands over the slave issue. Take an american woman's history class and they will discuss with pride their involvement of freeing the slaves.

I knew this was going to be said. I am gong to guess that in a time when they didn't have the mass media drilling propaganda in their heads such as "we are all the same" a large amount of those women did not have much more love or respect for the negro than their husbands. As for American woman's history class, a lot of that is probably bull. Just like any other special group they are going to try to build themselves up and make themselves appear more important than they actually were.

I am not denying that there were women that were involved in these things just as you say, I am just saying that there were plenty of men, also. And it was the men who had the power.

Northern brand spanking new factories needed slaves but didnt want to pay much nor pay to house them. But just to the south was a nigger gold mine. Why not just ride the abolishion movement to profits? Just like today with the Mexicans.

History keeps repeating itself.

I knew this was going to be said. I am gong to guess that in a time when they didn't have the mass media drilling propaganda in their heads such as "we are all the same" a large amount of those women did not have much more love or respect for the negro than their husbands. As for American woman's history class, a lot of that is probably bull. Just like any other special group they are going to try to build themselves up and make themselves appear more important than they actually were.

I am not denying that there were women that were involved in these things just as you say, I am just saying that there were plenty of men, also. And it was the men who had the power.

tis a mute point all in all cause we are so far from the real subject of the thread.

White race is much at risk cause white women are not producing babies. Now how can we get those white women to have some babies, HG?

As for American woman's history class, a lot of that is probably bull. Just like any other special group they are going to try to build themselves up and make themselves appear more important than they actually were.

lol, that's pretty funny. I had forgotten that aspect. In fact now that I think about it, the class was taught by a jewess, , had an aryan name though. lol

tis a mute point all in all cause we are so far from the real subject of the thread.

White race is much at risk cause white women are not producing babies. Now how can we get those white women to have some babies, HG?

The White birthrate will never rise to replacement rate-level of 2.1 so long as the GD kikes control White culture. This Sex-Drugs-and-Rock-and-Roll culture is simply not condusive. The jewsmedia controls the minds of the masses of White men and White women, therefore their actions. Having White babies ain't "cool", and hasn't been since the 60's.

Under NS, the Germans increased their birthrate by a whooping 50 percent in just 6 years (1933-39), proving it's easy when White nations and their media are run by and for the best interests of White people.

And so, all our efforts should be directed towards gaining FREEDOM FROM THE GD KIKES. Everything else is distraction. Simple as that.

(Btw Jane, you haven't sent me any freakin money lately - hint, hint)

So in your perfect world, an exceptional woman would be told to shut her mouth and "know her place" as "inferior' to any man, because he has a penis?

I would think it has a little more to it than this.

Surely you don't think the only difference between men and women is the absence or presence of a penis? Maybe at birth.

And stop calling you Shirley.

The White birthrate will never rise to replacement rate-level of 2.1 so long as the GD kikes control White culture. This Sex-Drugs-and-Rock-and-Roll culture is simply not condusive. The jewsmedia controls the minds of the masses of White men and White women, therefore their actions. Having White babies ain't "cool", and hasn't been since the 60's.

Under NS, the Germans increased their birthrate by a whooping 50 percent in just 6 years (1933-39), proving it's easy when White nations and their media are run by and for the best interests of White people.

And so, all our efforts should be directed towards gaining FREEDOM FROM THE GD KIKES. Everything else is distraction. Simple as that.

(Btw Jane, you haven't sent me any freakin money lately - hint, hint)

National socialist Germany also engaged in a program of eugenics.
It is not MORE White children that we need, but better QUALITY.
The White-man's strength has never been in his numbers, but in his interlect and spirit.
I agree with most of what Hitler Godess has said, though for reasons that she would probably DISAGREE with me.
It is the White man's fault that White women are such a corosive rabble, for they no longer have strong healthy White men to lead them.
Women just follow the power of the day, and unfortunately that lies with the God damned Jews.

Doesn’t really matter points Hitler Goddess is trying to make. Her rhetoric sounds much the same as a femi when she argues these same points and these point are really mute and distracting points. It becomes mute in the Women’s white nationalist movement, for it is not women like Hitler Goddess we need, always bringing up the same point about the ‘exceptional woman’ and ‘thoughts of sand niggers treatment of women as the normal of white men when they gain back the power’ line; it will be women like me and other strong white women, who know it is time to back down and allow our strong white men to take back the power within of our society and government in order for us to survive as a race and people.

Zog would lose a lot of power within the home if a woman would back down and take back her own power within the home and child rearing.

It is not MORE White children that we need, but better QUALITY.

We are an endangered race compared to the NUMBERS of people of other races. It is about numbers and it is about the qualities of our leaders who lead the numbers.

Was it not the number of russians thrown on the front lines compared to the numbers of high quality germans? Russia was able to keep the german back cause of the number of peasants to throw on the front lines and the weather.
That is part of the winning of ww2 by russia, wasn't it?

The number of white people is important. The number of white babies being born is important.