Why the White race ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Why the White race is so much at risk of extinction.

90 Posts
15 Users
0 Reactions
3,896 Views
(@hengest)
Posts: 302
Honorable Member
 

We are an endangered race compared to the NUMBERS of people of other races. It is about numbers and it is about the qualities of our leaders who lead the numbers.

Was it not the number of russians thrown on the front lines compared to the numbers of high quality germans? Russia was able to keep the german back cause of the number of peasants to throw on the front lines and the weather.
That is part of the winning of ww2 by russia, wasn't it?

The number of white people is important. The number of white babies being born is important.

Yes, I see point JW, but the problem is not a lack of White people in the world, it is the proliferation of non-Whites within White teriritories.
It is not our task to out-breed them, but to be rid of them.
Germany only lost the war because of the entry of America. Puny England was beaten, and Russia would have followed if not for the intervention of the Kwa.


 
Posted : 13/06/2006 8:36 pm
The Barrenness
(@the-barrenness)
Posts: 5492
Illustrious Member
 

It is not realistic in our current condition that women should just start having baby after baby. there are other things that come along with having babies and raising them into decent and healthy adults other than an ability to just pop them out. such as a strong family,etc. The problem, as always, is that the people who should be breeding are not, and those that should not, are. and that last line does not just apply to those outside of our race. What good, for example, is there in some degenerate, low IQ junkie, who happens to be white, having children? none.

Yes, I see point JW, but the problem is not a lack of White people in the world, it is the proliferation of non-Whites within White teriritories.

correct. Also maybe without the non-white trash taking over our neighborhoods and eating up our tax dollars and making things pretty miserable, more people would want to start having larger families again.


http://www.thephora.net/forum

FKA, Hitler Goddess, Starr

 
Posted : 13/06/2006 9:17 pm
(@anonymous)
Posts: 84005
Illustrious Member Guest
 

We are spiritual beings in physical form, in our instance human form. Eugenics is a naturally occuring process in this biological world. A well known example of this is the wolf pack. Most often, it is only the alpha male and female that breed, with the rest of the pack assisting in the raising of the young. In this manner, only the strongest, healthiest, and most intelligent members of the pack reproduce. I am aware that the concept of eugneics is distasteful to most people. Eugenics is a moral obligation. Why pass major genetic defects to the off-spring? I myself have no clear-cut answers to the questions that are raised concerning eugenics. It only makes sense that quality be the ultimate goal rather than quantity, and as in the wolf pack, all other members assist with raising the young. In the process of using the wolf pack as an analogy, it is not my intention to advocate breeding be left to two members of any community. I do, however, advocate that breeding by those with major genetic aberrations be discouraged, i.e. birth control. One does not have to resort to in-breeding. This is where inter-marriage between other White communites comes in.


 
Posted : 13/06/2006 10:26 pm
The Barrenness
(@the-barrenness)
Posts: 5492
Illustrious Member
 

Quality over quantity is a most important factor. Non whites have no concept of this whatsoever and will have babies just because they can. I don't really think that is a goal we should be shooting for.


http://www.thephora.net/forum

FKA, Hitler Goddess, Starr

 
Posted : 13/06/2006 10:36 pm
janewhite88
(@janewhite88)
Posts: 1050
Noble Member
 

Ya folks talk in extremes as usual. Crazy visions of over producing white trash? I have pleasant visions of school yards full of happy white children but, in real life I see over producing nigs and invading spics. We don’t even have the numbers to replace ourselves in our own territories. Duh.

Quality vs. quantity? I pick quantity now. Half the off springs in our white lands are Mexicans; we need white offspring children. Women need to be back in to home raising good white children where they naturally belong. And we don’t need to be side tracked with silly talk about, oh no, what if bad white folks reproduce? Sounds like crazy talk ya learned from the jew tube. This idea of bad white people reproducing, I laugh at that cause on the most part, whites are good, even the ones that live in trailers. I would rather have a bunch of low life white producing than this constant negro and spic production which is going on NOW. I stand by what I say, numbers are important. They are important now. Building strong white communities that are racially aware can only happen with white men and women producing white babies. I don’t put too much stock in changing the mind set of today’s white lemmings; half are guaranteed to walk off the cliff. I focus on the next generation and sing a song of men running the world and women running the house, as it was and needs to be again. I never waste time on the “buts" in this discussion.

We are becoming extinct, we need to build our numbers within our own land now cause we have just allowed the invading Mexicans squatters rights instead of ‘getting rid of them’ like the law allows. And I don’t see a chance in the next 5 years for us whites to be getting rid of them non whites in our territory. We are at a stand off so to speak. It is time to start building our armies for the future when it will be needed. I don’t put all my eggs in one basket thinking we will be recruiting enough from the lemmings’ pool to satisfy what will be needed in the future. Plus we must set examples for the future generations since they are so screwed in the head with ‘minority equals the majority’.
We need to break through and begin setting the standard for the next generation. Woman need to be talking ‘up’ the natural housekeeping and baby-producing role of the woman. We need to start setting the trend, not casting our words out to the wind so the jew can quickly gather the lost unguided white souls. Waiting for the ‘day of the rope’ ain’t going to do it; ya got to cut the path to the ‘day of the rope’ first. We have to do things we don’t want to do. To me it means getting off my ‘femi-high horse’ and seeing what I can do in my natural state as a woman and when I look around the old homestead, I see a lot of work that needs to be done.


Form follows function --Louis Sullivan

a jane white portfolio

 
Posted : 14/06/2006 9:24 am
 Ural
(@ural)
Posts: 683
Prominent Member
 

Doesn’t really matter points Hitler Goddess is trying to make. Her rhetoric sounds much the same as a femi when she argues these same points and these point are really mute and distracting points. It becomes mute in the Women’s white nationalist movement, for it is not women like Hitler Goddess we need, always bringing up the same point about the ‘exceptional woman’ and ‘thoughts of sand niggers treatment of women as the normal of white men when they gain back the power’ line]

The white women shouldn't back down but the white men should step forward. There are not the white women who compete with the white men but the muds. If all the white women quit in an instant, you think their positions will be given to the white men? Hell, no. It will be given to dumb blacks and illiterate mestizos. Who is going to win? Who will get more power?

The white race need absolutely new governmental politics, the white world needs to get rid of the muds. And, yes, yids, their influence in media, arts, TV and so on.
Blaming the white women for the corruption is silly and only hurts the fight for the survival. No woman is going to appreciate any attempt to lock her within her household. That choice must be done willingly. Any woman should be given every chance to get a good education, because dumb parents tend to have the dumb children. And when the children are grown up the white women should have every chance to make a career.

All the politics discriminating the white males should be destroyed. It's possible only when there's enough WNs in the government. Uneducated people don't have a chance in the modern society. But even here on forum you can see the discussions that the colleges are the waste of time. Yes, the system is yiddizised but you are adult enough to separate good from bad. Go get yourself a diploma, guys. Go become a judge, senator, mayor. Then you'll be in power to make changes. And the women will follow.


Just as modern mass production requires the standardization of commodities, so the social process requires standardization of man, and this standardization is called equality.
Erich Fromm

 
Posted : 14/06/2006 9:26 am
janewhite88
(@janewhite88)
Posts: 1050
Noble Member
 

The white women shouldn't back down but the white men should step forward. There are not the white women who compete with the white men but the muds. If all the white women quit in an instant, you think their positions will be given to the white men? Hell, no. It will be given to dumb blacks and illiterate mestizos. Who is going to win? Who will get more power?

The white race need absolutely new governmental politics, the white world needs to get rid of the muds. And, yes, yids, their influence in media, arts, TV and so on.
Blaming the white women for the corruption is silly and only hurts the fight for the survival. No woman is going to appreciate any attempt to lock her within her household. That choice must be done willingly. Any woman should be given every chance to get a good education, because dumb parents tend to have the dumb children. And when the children are grown up the white women should have every chance to make a career.

All the politics discriminating the white males should be destroyed. It's possible only when there's enough WNs in the government. Uneducated people don't have a chance in the modern society. But even here on forum you can see the discussions that the colleges are the waste of time. Yes, the system is yiddizised but you are adult enough to separate good from bad. Go get yourself a diploma, guys. Go become a judge, senator, mayor. Then you'll be in power to make changes. And the women will follow.

Another extreme vision and argument. Like I expect women to quit in an instant. But if woman start taking back the home front, less Latino housekeepers and nannies to hire which is a percentage of the illegal worker here in the USA. Why is it when I talk of women getting back to the home and building families of white children, immediately rhetoric of 'force','locking up', 'making them' comes up? What are ya, a bunch of downers? Are ya programmed to immediately say these words when ya hear key words like 'women' and 'mother' and 'wife' in a positive context? Jew programs ya to do this ya know. Ya gots to see it in ya's brain to make it happen. Ya don’t see it in ya’s brain. It is still mucked up with ‘no’ and ‘can’t’ and other ruts of jew femi responses. Stop ya's brain from doing that. Remember back to a time when the jew wasn't in there shouting their slogans.

Women follow trends. I am talking about creating and setting a trend. Duh. Quit with this idea of 'force'. Most girls would probably enjoy the idea of becoming wives and mothers. It is a fun and rewarding profession for a woman. Most of the professional women will work against our cause, don't encourage it. Woman aren't racially aware on the most part and the ones that are, need to be producing families.

Ya fear too much the natural way of things. Ya think that woman are forced to the home? They ain’t. A lot of women want to be stay at home moms. I hear it all the time. I tell them, tighten up the spending and make it happen. No "can’t"s, or "but"s in my mind.


Form follows function --Louis Sullivan

a jane white portfolio

 
Posted : 14/06/2006 9:49 am
 Ural
(@ural)
Posts: 683
Prominent Member
 

What the hell are you speaking, ebonics?


Just as modern mass production requires the standardization of commodities, so the social process requires standardization of man, and this standardization is called equality.
Erich Fromm

 
Posted : 14/06/2006 9:51 am
(@anonymous)
Posts: 84005
Illustrious Member Guest
 

With all due respect, Jane, I was speaking of genetic defects, not economic status. For example....hereditary heart defects, lung defects, along these lines. Good White people are good White people, no matter how large or how little their income bracket is. I do not look upon ones with lesser income as trash. Trash is trash. Income is not the determining factor. I do not look at ones with hereditary defects as trash, either. But I do believe they should choose not to continue these defects in future generations. There are too many other options in raising healthy White children to limit ourselves to producing genetically unhealthy children. It is not my intention to offend you with these observations. Some of our best breeders are turning to non-whites to bring forth more non-whites. I really do not see any way to keep this from happening except try and reach through their programmed minds. I am not sure this is even possible. We all have to work at re-instilling pride in being White and pride in producing healthy happy White families. It is essential we share our White heritage not only with our children, but all White children. I have found a good way to do this is not to dwell on what is wrong with the other races but instead to dwell on what is good and positive about the White race, and to be proud of these things that make us White.
Having said that, it would be good to have more White women such as yourself. Sincerely.


 
Posted : 14/06/2006 9:55 am
janewhite88
(@janewhite88)
Posts: 1050
Noble Member
 

What the hell are you speaking, ebonics?

No, southern white, low rent, sometimes referred to as ‘white trash’.

we say 'gots', 'ain't got no' and a few other things.


Form follows function --Louis Sullivan

a jane white portfolio

 
Posted : 14/06/2006 9:56 am
janewhite88
(@janewhite88)
Posts: 1050
Noble Member
 

With all due respect, Jane, I was speaking of genetic defects, not economic status. For example....hereditary heart defects, lung defects, along these lines. Good White people are good White people, no matter how large or how little their income bracket is. I do not look upon ones with lesser income as trash. Trash is trash. Income is not the determining factor. I do not look at ones with hereditary defects as trash, either. But I do believe they should choose not to continue these defects in future generations. There are too many other options in raising healthy White children to limit ourselves to producing genetically unhealthy children. It is not my intention to offend you with these observations. Some of our best breeders are turning to non-whites to bring forth more non-whites. I really do not see any way to keep this from happening except try and reach through their programmed minds. I am not sure this is even possible. We all have to work at re-instilling pride in being White and pride in producing healthy happy White families. It is essential we share our White heritage not only with our children, but all White children. I have found a good way to do this is not to dwell on what is wrong with the other races but instead to dwell on what is good and positive about the White race, and to be proud of these things that make us White.
Having said that, it would be good to have more White women such as yourself. Sincerely.

I really didn't mean to include you. Me and you are on the same path. I know what you are saying. I have no disagreement with you. You understand. ;) You want to create a good trend among the whites too.


Form follows function --Louis Sullivan

a jane white portfolio

 
Posted : 14/06/2006 10:01 am
 Ural
(@ural)
Posts: 683
Prominent Member
 

Women follow trends. I am talking about creating and setting a trend. Duh. Quit with this idea of 'force'. Most girls would probably enjoy the idea of becoming wives and mothers. It is a fun and rewarding profession for a woman. Most of the professional women will work against our cause, don't encourage it. Woman aren't racially aware on the most part and the ones that are, need to be producing families.

Ya fear too much the natural way of things. Ya think that woman are forced to the home? They ain’t. A lot of women want to be stay at home moms. I hear it all the time. I tell them, tighten up the spending and make it happen. No "can’t"s, or "but"s in my mind.

It was always a trend that the women were staying home with the small children. I don't know even one family around who has a latino nanny. Oh, yeah, I knew one but the woman was a white migrant from Latin America.

.

A lot of women want to be stay at home moms. I hear it all the time. .

Lots of them do. And those who don't - well, their husbands should make more money. I'm not blaming the guys. Again, the politics should support a single male provider. Though, there always were and will be poor people.

Tighten up the spending? yes, I agree, people spend way too much on the junk. Look at the Christmas frenzy. Government doesn't do enough to provide quality family time for the people. Trip to Orlando might be nice but you cannot do it every weekend. My friend has a friend in Norway. She says that people don't stay home on weekends, nor do they roam the malls. They go camping, hiking and so on. Everything is done to give people a chance to have affordable quality time. In small American towns what the mothers and children have? The damn government instead of building sport parks and public swimming pools spends money on the illegals, Israel, Africa and other shit. Back to government again.

We need more WN in power. That's it.


Just as modern mass production requires the standardization of commodities, so the social process requires standardization of man, and this standardization is called equality.
Erich Fromm

 
Posted : 14/06/2006 10:04 am
(@anonymous)
Posts: 84005
Illustrious Member Guest
 

It's allright. I have enough fiery celtic in me to understand the fiery celtic in you.


 
Posted : 14/06/2006 10:07 am
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

No, Shirt. NEVER call a White person "white trash." Our poorest Whites have genetics superior to the richest jew. Obviously, I'm generalizing and there are exceptions. But our poor, low IQ Whites are the foundation upon which have been built the highest civilizations the world has known. Without them, these civilizations could not have been built. This is one reason the jews have never built such civilizations themselves and never will -- they don't have this foundational quarry.

Our poor, low IQ Whites are, of course, as they should be and can only be, followers, marvellous followers. But they are followers without true White leadership -- but instead jew enemy leadership. What our poor, low IQ Whites are now in the kwa is not what they are or who they are.


 
Posted : 14/06/2006 10:54 am
(@anonymous)
Posts: 84005
Illustrious Member Guest
 

Did I miss something here? Who did I call white trash?


 
Posted : 14/06/2006 10:59 am
Page 6 / 6
Share: