Technically, you have a valid, but somewhat moot point. It boils down to personal preference.
For one thing, I think that the Z gives ZOG a more sinister, alien sound and connotation.
Secondly, a jewish apologist can turn your argument around and ask what the poor simple jew has to do with militant Zionism and it's orchestrated grab for world power.

The ideal is for Goys to be as frightened to utter either word as they are to say nigger out loud. The J-word and the Z-word take their places beside the N-word as euphemisms for forbidden words and thoughts.

So, the Z word is also a euphemism for the J word.
Same tribe, same agenda.

Why is the commonly accepted term: Zionist Occupied Government?

Why is it not JOG?

For example, what did the Jew-Bolsheviks have to Zionism?

Actually, I think the reason it's referred to as ZOG is because the jews pulling the strings in Western societies are doing so mainly for the benefit and betterment of Israel -- although the jew of course looks to improve the conditions of his fellow parasites at the expense of Whites in whatever nation they may latch onto.

My 2 cents anyway....

Wasn't it Eric Thomson who coined the term ZOG way back in the 60s? Or at least credited to him?

If it was him, it would be a straight-up reference to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Most WNs in the 60s felt that the Protocols were already running America. From a practical standpoint ZOG is a good shorthand term for the sort of country the Protocols have created.

We can still call it ZOG.

Lets make the 'Z' stand for Zhid!

Yes Eric Thomson coined "ZOG", although it stands not for "Zionist Occupied Government" but "Zionist OCCUPATION Government".

The reason is that there is an occupation government that occupies our land, but the members of this occupation government are not "of" us, being invaders. There is an occupation government in Germany made up of U.S. troops, still to this day, so many years after the end of WW2. The occupation government keeps the Germans in thrall, as does ours.

This is what I wrote:

"Thanks for the reminder SMG3000, and I really miss Eric's writings. I don't think ZOG can be improved on. Bush, Rumsfeld, and Ashcroft are all Zionists, yet none is a Yid, as far as I know.

Enkidu"

OK. Of course, here is what I meant to say:

Bush and Ashcroft are both Zionists, yet neither is a Yid, as far as I know.

Or, maybe,

Bush is a Zionist, yet he is not a Yid, as far as I know.

Or, perhaps,

They are all Yids, but I am not, as far as I know.

O! What the hell, have you guys seen "Fiddler on the Roof?" Wow! I was so moved.

Enkidu

Is this legitimate? Editing your post after it has been responded to. Am I breaking some rule?

I think Rummie is a crypto-kike. I have no real evidence other than his overtly zionist opinions and actions, his very brief online bio that gives none for religion, the kikely nature of the name, Rumsfeld, and the signals coming from my personal jewdar.

Thanks for the reminder SMG3000, and I really miss Eric's writings. I don't think ZOG can be improved on. Bush, Rumsfeld, and Ashcroft are all Zionists, yet none is a Yid, as far as I know.

Enkidu

Thanks for the reminder SMG3000, and I really miss Eric's writings. I don't think ZOG can be improved on. Bush, Rumsfeld, and Ashcroft are all Zionists, yet none is a Yid, as far as I know.

Enkidu

Are you kidding??? How much more jewish than Rumsfeld can you get? Cohen, maybe? Goldberg? Rothstein?

C'mon!!....

Are you kidding??? How much more jewish than Rumsfeld can you get? Cohen, maybe? Goldberg? Rothstein?

C'mon!!....

I agree. I thought Rumsfeld was a known Jew.

I agree. I thought Rumsfeld was a known Jew.

I mean....Jeeeshh!!

I agree. I thought Rumsfeld was a known Jew.

And what of Wolfowitz?!!