We can't be both.

Thus a new thread to discuss this primary internal struggle between the Bible-believing Xian patriots and the strict rational biological race-thinkers who recognize that the Xians' Bible is Jewish, not to mention their imaginary Jewish tribal god and "His" imaginary Jewish savior of a "Son" who supposededly died for their sins. What a load of Jewish crap for a supposed Teutonic Jew-fighter to seek his identity and life's purpose

This morning T Kadijevic wrote on the VNNF Fumigation thread:

http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=63868&page=7

Quote:
Originally Posted by T. Kadijevic
Again with the Christian bashing? Unless its affecting the views of those individuals, why is it an issue. Guys like Paul Drake are just creating these imaginary issues for the forum. What Christians here are subverting the forum? And stop fence sitting as an atheist. Only jewz can show much contempt to Christians and their beliefs (yes, I'm aware that jewz like to subvert Christians orgs too!).

Mr. Drake is not raising an imaginary issue. He's raising THE issue, and his contempt for those who claim to be a Jew-fighter while worshiping a Jew god is entirely justified, just as Dr. Pierce taught us it is. It's like having one's right foot flooring the gas pedal on a car and the left rammed down on the brake. How will we ever get anywhere lying to our people that the Jew's tribal god is actually their god when we know it's not? And that going to Jewish heaven instead of Jewish hell is what's most important in life?

So, enter earlier Jim Crowe writing the following on the same VNNF Fumigation thread: http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=63868&page=8

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Crowe
...God forbid anyone on VNN has their own opinion on something or doesn't toe the party line on everything.

So what does that say about the posters the wish to censor political speech? It says that they are both insecure and have no confidence in their own beliefs. They simply need like-minded individuals constantly reinforcing their own belief system. I'm not worried about someone disagreeing with me on something. I love a good debate.

That's a transparent straw man argument, setting someone like myself or the inimitable and persistent Mr. Drake up as "insecure" with self-esteem problems, calling us "atheists (who believe in nothing)," unlike the confident men with strong beliefs that we are and that Dr. Pierce was, because we refuse to accept their silly worship of make believe Jewish spooks.

Our view is biological -- it's about Blood & Soil, not spooks. That's the idea Dr. Pierce was building our movement around. It's an idea many Whites are not yet ready to accept, but that's the idea that attracted men like me and Mr. Drake to Dr. Pierce. Pierce's plan was to build a vanguard of men and women who agreed with that idea -- no constant questioning of the idea, attacking it, saying the docile Xian sheep will never accept the idea -- and build a movement of will and determination around that idea and the small core of cadre who embrace that idea, not with the Xian mob who reject it.

Here, below, is posted Dr. Pierce's own words from 30 years ago. Compare this with Jim Crowe's statement that we do not need a vanguard that agrees on the same hard line idea, then the reader might begin to grasp what has gone wrong with the "new" National Alliance and with the greater White resistance movement sine we lost Dr. William Pierce:

"Our task is not to pursuade a numerical majority of the American population that we are right but rather to build the numerical minority of those whose values coincide with ours into a majority of will and determination." - William L. Pierce, Founder of the National Alliance, speaking at the First General Convention of that organization in September, 1978