Uncle shmuel has given the Murderous Clique subs, jets and missiles to do the job but from what I read Putin has also slipped the Iranians his Sunburn missiles and those bad-boys cancel it all out.
Whether the GOP Jew's boy or the Dem. Jewboy wins we will continue to do what they say. Either will wait til after election to ratchet it up. Either will start draft in next two years.

They'll probably wait awhile before bombing Iran. They just had a major earthquake back in December and they look just a little too helpless.

I'm putting my money on Syria, they're hiding Saddam's Weapons of Mass Destruction, from what I understand....

I'd say they're the most likely candidates for a good ol' dose of American "shock n' awe" - courtesy of the puppet-masters in "Vhashingkton." You know we don't have the cajones to fuck with the N. Koreans, even though they're one of the "Big Three" on our hit list. Those rugged little, armed-to-the-teeth, balls-out fucks would give us the "how-to and what-for" we've been asking for as of late. Most militaristic and controlled society on Earth. That, combined with the fact you know the Chosen will not allow our attention to be diverted from the "The Holy Land" for one friggin' minute. Yup....I'd say Iran's on deck alright.

This from some jewish alert system.

"UN nuclear inspectors have found traces of extremely highly enriched uranium in Iran, of a purity reserved for use in a nuclear bomb, European and American diplomats said Wednesday. If the enrichment took place in Iran, it means the country is much further along the road to becoming a nuclear weapons power than even the most aggressive intelligence estimates anticipated. (New York Times)"

I'm not registered with the JEW York Times. Perhaps somebody else here could post the article.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/11/international/middleeast/11NUKE.html

They are probably drawing straws between Syria and Iran, figuring out which target can more easily be justified to the ridiculously stupid American public.

Personally, I think they will attack Syria because Iran might actually fight back -- certainly the populace is more motivated.

We never attack any country that could possibly fight back.

Here you go, Billy Bob.

VIENNA, March 10 — United Nations nuclear inspectors have found traces of extremely highly enriched uranium in Iran, of a purity reserved for use in a nuclear bomb, European and American diplomats said Wednesday. Among traces that inspectors detected last year are some refined to 90 percent of the rare 235 isotope, the diplomats said. While the International Atomic Energy Agency has previously reported finding "weapons grade" traces, it has not revealed that some reached such a high degree of enrichment.

The presence of such traces raises the stakes in the international debate over Iran's nuclear program and increases the urgency of determining the uranium's origin. If the enrichment took place in Iran, it means the country is much further along the road to becoming a nuclear weapons power than even the most aggressive intelligence estimates anticipated.

Iran has said that its nuclear program is for purely peaceful purposes, while the United States contends it has secretly tried to produce nuclear weapons. The atomic agency is expected to vote Friday on a resolution criticizing Iran for lack of candor about its nuclear efforts.

Iran has said that all of the highly enriched uranium found on its nuclear facilities was contamination that occurred before imported equipment arrived in the country. Iranian officials said they could not identify the origin of the contamination because the equipment was imported through middlemen in five countries.

I.A.E.A. officials said the contamination may have originated in Pakistan. Abdul Qadeer Khan, a Pakistani nuclear weapons scientist, has admitted secretly supplying uranium enrichment equipment to Iran and other nations. The agency has asked Pakistan for permission to take environmental samples from its enrichment facilities to see if they match the weapons-grade traces in Iran. "Pakistan could let Iran off the I.A.E.A. hook," said a European diplomat here.

American officials argue that traces of such highly enriched uranium, regardless of their origin, are another disturbing clue to what they believe are Iran's hidden ends.

"What it shows is that they have a system that is capable of producing weapons grade uranium," said an American official speaking from Washington. "If it's an assembly that was removed from Pakistan or elsewhere, it's already battle tested," he said.

On Wednesday, Iran's defense minister, Ali Shamkhani, acknowledged for the first time that the Iranian military had produced centrifuges to enrich uranium, the Associated Press reported from Teheran. He said they were manufacturing unsophisticated models for civilian users. The admission came after the I.A.E.A. presented Iran with evidence that some of its nuclear activities were taking place on military bases.

"It's rather strange, don't you think, that the military gets involved in the electric-power generating business?" asked one senior American official. "Or that they forgot to mention this before, when they were `fully disclosing' all details of their program?" American officials are lobbying hard to keep international pressure on Iran.

An I.A.E.A. resolution on Libya, passed by the agency's board of governors on Wednesday, is part of that campaign. The resolution, negotiated by the United States, Britain and Libya in London last week, praises Libya for swiftly dismantling the nuclear weapons program discovered last year. But the resolution's key paragraph calls for the agency to report Libya's past breaches of the Nonproliferation Treaty to the United Nations Security Council.

"The trap is sprung," said a senior American administration official speaking from Washington, saying that the Libyan resolution sets a precedent for future I.A.E.A. resolutions on Iran. "It makes it very hard not to at some point address Iran's breaches by referring them to the Security Council," he said.

The United States has been lobbying since late last year to threaten Iran with Security Council scrutiny if it continued to withhold information on the scope of its nuclear program. Britain, France and Germany have resisted making an explicit threat for fear that it would anger Iran and hinder future cooperation.

Iran warned Wednesday that American-led criticism could "complicate" its relations with the I.A.E.A. "America is taking advantage of any opportunity to put pressure on Iran," Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi said in Teheran, the Associated Press reported. "Unfortunately the I.A.E.A. is sometimes influenced in this regard."

Mr. Kharrazi was quoted as saying that Iran would resume enriching uranium for peaceful purposes once its relations with the I.A.E.A. "return to normal."

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/11/i...ast/11NUKE.html

Here you go, Billy Bob.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/11/i...ast/11NUKE.html

Neo-Cons Target Syria
By TOM BARRY

Getting out of the political quicksand of Iraq, or at least burying the bloody occupation as an embarrassing daily news item, is mission number one for the Bush campaign.

Extricating U.S. troops and political capital from the mess the Bush administration created in Iraq may be mission impossible. But the president's political and ideological handlers have proved adept at spinning the administration out of scandals and misadventures. Their operating principle, which they enshrined as official national security strategy, seems to be: the best defense is a good offense.

When you are down in the polls and the "bring 'em on" machismo no longer seems to get the patriotic rise it first did, the Bush team doesn't retreat. It advances with more tough words backed by military muscle and missionary zeal. The Bush administration still has an itchy trigger finger, and is in search of another evildoer to confront.

Even before the U.S. occupation forces settled into Saddam Hussein's palaces in Baghdad, the neoconservatives who have set the direction of the Bush presidency's radical foreign and military policies were looking toward Syria. Before the month is out, it's likely that President Bush will announce new sanctions against Syria--accusing the northern neighbor of Israel, Lebanon, and Iraq of many of the same offenses that were leveled against the Hussein regime in Iraq. The charge list includes developing biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction, condemning the U.S. occupation of Iraq, supporting international terrorism, and succoring anti-U.S. and anti-Israel guerrilla forces.

Immediately before the Iraq invasion, Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security traveled to Israel and promised Prime Minister Ariel Sharon that "it will be necessary to deal with threats from Syria, Iran, and North Korea afterwards." In April 2003 Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz warned: "There's got to be a change in Syria."

Road to Damascus

The road to Damascus, which is at the center of the Bush administration's roadmap for restructuring the Middle East, doesn't run directly from Baghdad. Its starting points are in Washington, Jerusalem/Tel Aviv, and Beirut--charted by the neoconservative think-tanks, the Christian Right, and the right-wing Zionists who move easily back and forth between Capitol Hill and the Middle East.

The neoconservatives harbor a deep sense of history--one that is shaped, they say, by the forces of good and evil and the righteous and the appeasers. For the neocons, history also teaches the virtues of certain political strategies, such as the necessity of establishing bipartisan front groups and establishing the legislative foundation for their agendas.

One of the key figures who has set Washington on the road to Damascus is Ziad K. Abdelnour, an expatriate investment banker from Lebanon who, together with neocon supporters of Israel's Likud Party and the Christian Right, established the U.S. Committee for a Free Lebanon (USCFL) in 1997.

The USCFL describes itself as the "cyber-center for Pro-Lebanon Activism." USCFL was one of the leading proponents of the "Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003," which calls for a series of sanctions against Syria and which President Bush signed on December 12, 3003.

Like Ahmad Chalabi, chief of the London-based and U.S.-financed Iraqi National Congress (INC), the USCFL's Abdelnour is an expatriate investment banker. He has lobbied the Bush administration and the U.S. Congress for a U.S. foreign policy that mirrors the hard-line position of Israel's Likud Party. Working closely with neocon supporters on Capitol Hill in the late 1990s, Chalabi helped persuade Congress to pass the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, which provided support for the Iraqi National Congress and other anti-Saddam Hussein forces. The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 set the bipartisan foundation for a military-induced regime change in Iraq. In the lead-up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, necon polemicists such as Richard Perle, William Kristol, and Bruce Jackson created the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq (CLI) to consolidate bipartisan support for the preventive war.

The neoconservatives, strongly backed the right-wing Zionist lobby through such groups as the Orthodox Union and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, have followed a similar strategy to advance their agenda for political transformation in Syria and Lebanon. In much the same way that they moved forward their agenda for regime change in Iraq step by step, the neocon advocates for a radical transformation in the Middle East have in the case of Syria and Lebanon also formed a "front group"--USCFL--and supported bipartisan legislation that establish the political base for sanctions against Iraq--and eventual U.S. military action. USCFL's page of "selected links" recommends just three lobbying organizations: Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and Christian Coalition of America. (4)

USCFL, a self-described "non-profit, non-sectarian think tank," states that it aims to rid the Middle East of "dictatorships, radical ideologies, existential conflicts, border disagreements, political violence, and weapons of mass destruction" and to do so while abiding with the tenets of the Charter of the United Nations. (5) (6)

USCFL's core supporters, which it calls its "Golden Circle," include several members of the Bush administration: Elliott Abrams, Richard Perle, Paula Dobriansky, Michael Rubin, and David Wurmser. Other prominent neocons in the Golden Circle include Daniel Pipes (Middle East Forum and U.S. Institute for Peace), Frank Gaffney (Center for Security Policy), Jeane Kirkpatrick (AEI) , Michael Ledeen (AEI), David Steinmann (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs), and Eleana Benador (Middle East Forum). Also included in this circle of those who have donated $1,000 or more to USCFL is Rep. Eliot Engel (R-NY), the congressional representative who was the main sponsor of the Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003.

The 2000 report by Pipes and Abdelnour concluded that that "Syrian rule in Lebanon stands in direct opposition to American ideals." It strongly criticized Washington's policy of engaging Syria rather than confronting it. The Lebanon Study Group of the Middle East Forum advocated harsh economic and diplomatic sanctions. "The Vietnam legacy and the sour memories of dead American Marines in Beirut notwithstanding," the group observed, "the United States has entered a new era of undisputed military supremacy coupled with an appreciable drop in human losses on the battlefield." Finally, said the report, "If there is to be decisive action, it will have to be sooner rather than later."

----

The Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003 received overwhelming support in both the House and the Senate. This public law aims: "To halt Syrian support for terrorism, end its occupation of Lebanon, stop its development of weapons of mass destruction, cease its illegal importation of Iraqi oil and illegal shipments of weapons and other military items to Iraq, and by so doing hold Syria accountable for the serious international security problems it has caused in the Middle East, and for other purposes." It is designed to punish Damascus for its alleged links to terrorist groups and its alleged efforts to develop weapons of mass destruction. It bans all transfers of "dual-use" technology to Syria. In addition, the act recommends an arsenal of sanctions against Syria, including: reducing diplomatic contacts with Syria, banning U.S. exports (except food and medicine) to Syria, prohibiting U.S. businesses from investing or operating in Syria, restricting the travel of Syrian diplomats in the United States, banning Syrian aircraft from operating in the United States, and freezing Syrian assets in the United States. Although the bill obligates the executive branch to enact at least two of the recommended sanctions, it does permit the president to waive the sanctions if it is determined that they would harm U.S. national security.

USCFL commended Rep. Engel for his leadership in moving the bill through the House, and also expressed its special appreciation for the strong support provided by Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) and to Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Rick Santorum (R-PA) "for pioneering it in the Senate." (1)

The appointment of David Wurmser, a long-time advocate of U.S. military action against Syria, to the staff of Vice President Cheney in September 2003, followed by the president's signing of the Syria Accountability act in December were widely regarded as another signal that the U.S. regional restructuring crusade might soon be embarking on the road to Damascus. If the president imposes sanctions against Syria rather than attempting to engage it through diplomatic channels, it's likely that the Syrian regime will be painted with the same fear-mongering brush used to justify the invasion of Iraq. With Osama bin Laden still on the lam and bedlam in occupied Iraq, the Bush administration needs to refocus public attention on another evildoer--which, not so coincidently, is also the next preferred target of the Likudniks in Israel.

http://www.counterpunch.org/barry03092004.html

HOUSE CALLS FOR STOPPING IRAN'S NUKES BY ALL MEANS
http://www.menewsline.com/stories/2004/may/05_10_2.html

Israel Preparing To Attack Iran N-Sites, Says Report
http://www.indolink.com/displayArticleS.php?id=050804113429

US Prepares For Israeli Attack On Iran
http://www.rense.com/general52/attk.htm

N Korea Selling Big Missile In Mideast
http://www.rense.com/general52/kor.htm

Israel should bomb strategic targets in Damascus
http://www.thedailystar.net/2004/05/10/d405101302106.htm

What are the Chances of a Two-fer?
That ought to really piss the Arabs off eh?

After Iran inspections are scrapped,
Israel urges West to keep up pressure
http://www.jta.org/page_view_story.asp?intarticleid=13875&intcategoryid=1

Powell Says World Cannot Be Idle on Iran
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/politics/8185731.htm

This from some jewish alert system.

"UN nuclear inspectors have found traces of extremely highly enriched uranium in Iran, of a purity reserved for use in a nuclear bomb, European and American diplomats said Wednesday. If the enrichment took place in Iran, it means the country is much further along the road to becoming a nuclear weapons power than even the most aggressive intelligence estimates anticipated. (New York Times)"

I'm not registered with the JEW York Times. Perhaps somebody else here could post the article.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/11/international/middleeast/11NUKE.html

More calls for the Invasion of Iran!
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/03/12/EDGVQ5I9VF1.DTL
"Toppling the mullahs would not require a U.S. invasion. The majority of Iran's 67 million people loathe their government. Many are unabashedly pro- American. If the United States explicitly called for regime change in Tehran and backed up that call with diplomatic and financial support for the pro- democracy resistance, Iranians would respond with courage and resolve"

Sure looks easy on paper eh? I wonder if the Iranians really want to be invaded?
Oh, That's right, Zoggy can just Hire Mercenaries to go in and fight for Them. I like the way they word it. "Financially backing the pro-democracy resistance"

The Grand Master Kike Uses his Words carefully. Any Significance to the Order of Nations referred to. Why is Iran at the top of the list?

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=263941
"Sharon said that Israel was concerned about the security threat posed by Iran, and stressed that it was important to deal with Iran even while American attention was focused on Iraq."

The Russians made a multi billion dollar deal with Iran to build a number of nuclear power plants.( I think it was (7)). Iran has the potential to become the electrical energy supplier of the entire Mideast, thereby relieving itself of depending on oil exports. This will make Iran a major player in the Mideast. Russia already took a lose over Iraq. I don't think they will sit back and take another. Personally, I think Russia should enter the Mideast with a force. which will establish an alternative position. Lee

Iran will be a hard nut to crack because of their religious beliefs, look at the suicide attacks in Iraq, and bear in mind that Iraq was a seculare country.
If they go into Iran they will be faced with THOUSANDS of suicide attackers!

Iran will be a hard nut to crack because of their religious beliefs, look at the suicide attacks in Iraq, and bear in mind that Iraq was a seculare country.
If they go into Iran they will be faced with THOUSANDS of suicide attackers!

U.S does not have enough troops to occupy Iran population 90 million.

If Israel attacks Iranian ground(no matter where) we will show them what Iranians can do.
Then ALL Iranians from Kurds to Pamirs will do a revolt and an Ahuranian War!
Jihad? LOL, never heard about the Ahuranian War?
When Iraq fight against Iran, the Ahuranian kurdish warriors in the north of Iraq support Iran 100%!
Attack Iran and you will have 200 million enemies.

Ahura Ahura Mazda Yazd Az Khane Me!
Aryan Aryan Az Kazre Mazda Az Zamine Aryan!

Our Blood Will Drown The Jews On The Battle Field!

Aryans About ALL!

Thousands Rally In Iran Against Occupation Of Iraq
http://www.rense.com/general53/aganoc.htm

I WONDER HOW MANY WILL RESPOND?

After Iran inspections are scrapped,
Israel urges West to keep up pressure
http://www.jta.org/page_view_story.asp?intarticleid=13875&intcategoryid=1

Powell Says World Cannot Be Idle on Iran
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/politics/8185731.htm

This from some jewish alert system.

"UN nuclear inspectors have found traces of extremely highly enriched uranium in Iran, of a purity reserved for use in a nuclear bomb, European and American diplomats said Wednesday. If the enrichment took place in Iran, it means the country is much further along the road to becoming a nuclear weapons power than even the most aggressive intelligence estimates anticipated. (New York Times)"

I'm not registered with the JEW York Times. Perhaps somebody else here could post the article.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/11/international/middleeast/11NUKE.html

More calls for the Invasion of Iran!
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/03/12/EDGVQ5I9VF1.DTL
"Toppling the mullahs would not require a U.S. invasion. The majority of Iran's 67 million people loathe their government. Many are unabashedly pro- American. If the United States explicitly called for regime change in Tehran and backed up that call with diplomatic and financial support for the pro- democracy resistance, Iranians would respond with courage and resolve"

Sure looks easy on paper eh? I wonder if the Iranians really want to be invaded?
Oh, That's right, Zoggy can just Hire Mercenaries to go in and fight for Them. I like the way they word it. "Financially backing the pro-democracy resistance"

The Grand Master Kike Uses his Words carefully. Any Significance to the Order of Nations referred to. Why is Iran at the top of the list?

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=263941
"Sharon said that Israel was concerned about the security threat posed by Iran, and stressed that it was important to deal with Iran even while American attention was focused on Iraq."

I think this is Russia's way of saying, "Don't fuck with Iran.".

Putin: Iran Is Our Old Friend and Partner

MOSCOW (Dispatches) -- Russian President Vladimir Putin hailed the development of relations between Moscow and Tehran during a meeting Monday with Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal Kharazi, amid pressure from Washington to break their ties.

"Iran is our old and stable partner," Putin said during the Kremlin meeting.

"We know that the leaders of Iran attach great importance to the development of relations with Russia, and we are grateful," Putin said.

He added that trade between the two countries rose by 70 percent over the past two years, AFP reported.

Russia is building the Bushehr nuclear reactor in Iran despite fierce protests from the United States.

Kharrazi's visit came days after Iran's atomic energy deputy chief came to Moscow in a bid to accelerate Bushehr's construction project.

Russia took on the Bushehr project from Germany's Siemens company, which first began the plant's construction in 1974 before halting it amid U.S. pressures.

Kharrazi for his part said he was satisfied with how ties were developing between Moscow and Tehran.

"To our happiness, relations between Iran and Russia are developing positively, and this is a result of the political will shown by the leaders of our two countries," Kharazi said.

"Russia and Iran can cooperate not only bilaterally, but also on international and regional problems, and we are fully prepared to work together with Russia in this direction," the Iranian foreign minister said.

Thousands Rally In Iran Against Occupation Of Iraq
http://www.rense.com/general53/aganoc.htm

"TEHRAN (Reuters) -- Tens of thousands of Iranians took part in a state-sponsored rally yesterday to demand US-led forces leave Iraq."

"Chanting "Death to America! Death to Britain!", the crowd burned the US flag at Tehran's central Enqelab square."

IMAGINE IF THAT WERE HAPPENING HERE IN AMERICA.

IMAGINE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF WHITE AMERICANS
STANDING IN THE STREETS SHOUTING "DEATH TO ISRAEL!"

"DEATH TO JEWS!"

BURNING "ISRAELI FLAGS" AND "ARIEL SHARON" IN EFFIGY!

SUPPOSEDLY HAL TURNER IS OPENLY CALLING FOR SHARON'S HEAD.

I WONDER HOW MANY WILL RESPOND?

ZOG has one big hurdle to ruling without challenge,and that big hurdle is the Islamic world.If ZOG breaks the back of Islamic resistance there will be no more impediments to creating the gulag it has in store for us.Islam is certainly not our friend but, since the white man no longer has any testicles or backbone(what an anthropological anomaly!),to fight his Marxist-Kikenvermin-Racetraitor enemy,Islam will have to do it for him.