Forum
- Home
- Forum
Notifications
Clear all
General Discussion
9
Posts
4
Users
0
Reactions
845
Views
Topic starter
You Might Be An Anti-Semite If...
...You think that Jesus was a good guy who had some important things to say about peace on earth, human rights and respect for your fellow man...
...You think that the idea of one select group of people, the Jews, being a ‘master race’ who are ‘destined to rule the world with a rod of iron’ is a bunch of nonsense...
...You think that exterminating over a billion Muslims just because they dared to prevent their centuries-old culture from being conquered by the multi-headed beast of Zionism might not be such a good idea...
...You reject the popular notion that Islam is a religion of war and instead after some study find it to be a religion of peace that holds Jesus and his mother in the highest esteem and find that the Qur’an possesses some of the most beautiful religious verse ever written...
...You believe that Judaism’s Holiest Book, the Talmud, has an anti-Gentile and anti-Christian flavor to it, and that all of that stuff contained in it about Judas being a hero, about Mary being a prostitute and about Jesus being a sorcerer who is burning in Hell are just a few of the many reasons why there have been anti-Jewish sentiments throughout history...
...You think that the world’s most powerful nations, particularly those in the West, are controlled by individuals who are religious fanatics devoted to implementing some farcical, whacked-out conspiracy theory called the ‘Zionist agenda’.
...You think that the land of Palestine was once inhabited by a group of people called ‘the Palestinians’ who actually lived there for 2,000 years, and further, that this mythical group of people called ‘the Palestinians’ deserve this thing known as ‘dignity’ and that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, and that among these inalienable rights are ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness’...
...You believe that Islam and Christianity have much in common with each other and that this whole ‘clash of civilizations’ much discussed by Jewish supremacists such as Daniel Pipes, Bernard Lewis and many others is just an attempt to get the peoples of the Christian and Muslim worlds at each other’s throats so that in the end Zionism will reign supreme...
...You think that the idea of evicting a Christian or Muslim family living in Palestine from their home at gunpoint so that some New York-born Jewish pornographer can move in and take their place is not necessarily a moral thing to do...
...You think that when Jesus called the Pharisees ‘a brood of vipers’ and ‘children of the devil’ he was trying to warn future generations about the danger of the Jewish agenda, and that when he said ‘you cannot pour new wine into old wineskins’ what he was trying to say was that there was no such thing as ‘Judeo-Christianity’.
...You think that the leer jet given to Christian Zionist preacher Jerry Falwell by the state of Israel was a payback for all the hard work he has done in deluding American Christians into believing that it was all ‘God’s plan’ that millions of atheist Jews from Russia and eastern Europe occupy Palestine, the very birthplace of Jesus, and that the million-dollar salaries that his cohorts receive—Pat Robertson, John Hagee and Tim LaHaye are all part of that big payoff as well...
...You think that nuclear weapons being in the hands of religious fundamentalists who possess a messianic mindset and who nurse a fanatical hatred for people of other religions besides their own is a recipe for disaster, and you’re not talking about Iran but rather Israel...
...You think that the solution to the age old ‘Jewish question’ is for the Jews to quit seeing themselves as ‘the Chosen people’ and to make an honest attempt at treating others with the same kind of respect that they themselves demand from the rest of mankind...
...You think that the recent uproar in Europe over the cartoon depictions of the Prophet Mohammed done by a Jewish supremacist named Rosen was a deliberate attempt on the part of the Zionist agenda to further enflame tensions between the Christian and Islamic worlds...
...You believe that men with names such as Wolfowitz, Pearle, Ledeen, Abrams, Feith, and Libby who held high positions of influence in the Bush administration counseled the President into going to war in the Middle East and that they lied about Iraq’s weapons of Mass Destruction and that they did all of this for the furtherance of fighting Israel’s enemies...
...You believe that the current spy investigation with regards to AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee is in the best interests of America’s national security and that it is not all just an attempt to unfairly smear Jews and taint them with the charge of being more loyal to the Israeli agenda than to what are the best interests of their own country of America...
...You believe that men such as Lenin, Trotsky, Zinoviev, Berea and the other revolutionaries of Bolshevik Russia who were responsible for murdering tens of millions of people originally had names such as Bronstein, Apfelbaum, Rosenfeld, Sobelsohn and many others of similar stripe and then changed them in an effort to hide the fact that they were Jewish, and you do so after having read about all of it in something called the Jewish Encyclopedia...
...You believe that the remark recently made by one of Israel’s Military advisors that the Zionist nation could ‘strike all the capitals of the West with nuclear weapons’ should be seen as clear and present danger, and particularly after considering that Israel’s nuclear policy has always contained within it something known as ‘The Sampson Option’ which calls for the nuclear annihilation of all Christian and Muslim countries in the event that Israel is about to ‘go under’...
...You think that all of this business concerning ‘the rapture’ wherein ‘believers’ (meaning self-described Christian Zionists) who support this very un-Christian agenda known as Zionism will be rewarded for siding with the enemies of Christ’s message by being physically taken into heaven is just a little bit over-the edge...
...You believe the testimony given by a man named Victor Ostrovsky, ex-Israeli intelligence officer working for the Mossad who wrote in his two books ‘By Way of Deception’ and ‘The Other Side of Deception’ that the Israelis were planning to assassinate President George Herbert Walker Bush at the Madrid peace conference in 1991 in order to blame it on Palestinian terrorists was probably true...
...You believe that those 100 or so Israeli agents who were arrested in the wake of 9/11 in incriminating circumstances such as cheering at the destruction of the Twin Towers knew something about it beforehand and that all the jumping up and down and hollering that was taking place wasn’t all part of an out-of-the-way Bar-Mitzvah celebration...
...You believe that Americans are not obligated to sacrifice the lives of their children, their paychecks, and their security so that Israel can continue to exist like a cancer in the Middle East...
...You believe that Israel had something to do with the anthrax attacks in 2001, and that the chief suspect in it, a Zionist Jew who worked for the US Army Weapons lab, did it all for the purpose of blaming the Arabs and further inciting the American people into supporting the war against Israel’s enemies...
...You believe that the attack on the USS Liberty in 1967 was a deliberate act on the part of the Israelis in order to drag the US into the Six Day War on their side and that after 8 hours of low-level overflights they did not really mistake what was the most advanced intelligence-gathering ship in the world at that time for an Egyptian Horse ferry that was built at the turn of the previous century...
...You believe that the surviving members of the USS Liberty who testified about what took place on that day in which 34 of their fellow US servicemen were killed and almost 200 wounded did so because they were loyal Americans who had a duty to tell the truth and that whatever their feelings about Jews might have been had little or nothing to do with it...
...You believe that Israel was responsible for the assassination of President Kennedy as a result of his opposition to her acquiring nuclear weapons and that the assassination of his brother Robert by a ‘Palestinian terrorist’ named Sirhan Sirhan was just another of Israel’s many ‘False Flag Operations’...
...You believe the press reports that were published in Israel boasting of the involvement of Israeli intelligence with the blackmailing of President Clinton through a sex scandal involving a young Jewess named Monica Lewinsky ...
...You believe the press reports published in Israel admitting to the existence of an Israeli-engineered biological weapon referred to as ‘the ethnic bomb’ that is designed to target specific genetically-disposed peoples such as those of Arabic descent...
...You believe that there is an agenda to silence critics of Israel by threatening individuals for speaking out with loss of employment or imprisonment and particularly those who dare to question the mechanics of what happened during the Holocaust...
...You believe that there is this thing known as the Jewish Defense League that remains to this day on the FBI’s top-ten list of most dangerous terrorist organizations and that several of its members have been convicted recently for their involvement in plotting to blow up the office of US Representative Daryl Issa, a Congressman of Middle Eastern descent ...
...You believe that a man named Dr Rudolph Kastner, an important official who once worked for the World Zionist Organization conspired with the Nazis to subject the Jews of Europe to a program of persecution and suffering in order to further the agenda of creating a ‘Jewish homeland’ in Palestine...
...You believe the press reports coming out of Israel which quoted Prime Minister Ariel Sharon as having said to cabinet minister Shimon Peres ‘not to worry about American pressure on Israel,’ since ‘we, the Jewish people control America and the Americans know it’...
...You believe that the peoples of Iraq and Palestine have the right to defend their homelands against a foreign invasion, including the use of violence and that what they are doing today is no different than what American patriots did some 200 years ago in fighting for their freedom against a foreign, occupying power...
...You believe that indeed the prophecies found in the Book of Revelations are real and that they are being played out in our own time, but that the description of the Beast who ‘received a fatal wound to the head and yet lived’ refers neither to Saddam Hussein nor Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, but rather to Ariel Sharon and his recent stroke...
...You believe that the recent declaration by the Catholic Church that ‘Judas did nothing wrong in betraying Jesus, and that mankind owes him a great debt for having fulfilled God’s prophecy’ is in fact an attempt on the part of a Zionist-occupied Vatican to appease the Jewish agenda...
...You thought that the ‘Passion of the Christ’ was worth an artistic award of some type but refused to see ‘The Last Temptation of Christ’ out of principle...
...You think that the insistence on the part of Rabbi David Feldman from the group ‘Jews Against Anti-Semitism’ that Mel Gibson be arrested and tried as a terrorist under the provisions of the Patriot Act for having made the movie ‘The Passion of the Christ’ would be a violation of his right to free speech ...
...You think that the business of calling Muslims and others from the Middle East ‘rag-heads, sand niggers and hajjis’ is racist in its nature...
...You believe that Israeli Intelligence was involved with the Abu Ghraib prison torture scandal after seeing an AP photo of a Mossad officer at the facility sporting a Star of David Tattoo on his left shoulder...
...You do not believe that the invasion and occupation of Iraq was all about finding Weapons of Mass Destruction and you are confident that you are correct when 3 years later none have been found...
...You believe that Israel intends to take over all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates rivers after reading some comments from the Founding Fathers of Zionism wherein they speak of this thing called ‘Greater Israel’ that just happens to lie between the Nile and the Euphrates rivers...
...You believe that the Jews should be held to the same standards as every other human being without being given any preferential treatment that might exonerate or in other ways cover up what has been a dark history on their part of brutality and duplicity against other peoples, and that indeed the whole idea of there being a ‘chosen race’ of people is as stupid as was the flat-earth theory that in previous centuries impeded so much of mankind’s development ...
Yes, indeed you might be an anti-Semite if you believe just one of these forbidden items...
...But then again, maybe you’re not.
‘You Might Be An Anti-Semite If...’ is an excerpt of the most recent piece by author Mark Glenn entitled ‘Old Wineskins’ which can be found at www.crescentandcross.com.
The author can be reached at mrkglenn@yahoo.com
“When I get re-elected I'm going to fuck the Jews" -- Jimmy Carter, 1980.
Posted : 22/05/2006 12:53 am
‘You Might Be An Anti-Semite If...’ is an excerpt of the most recent piece by author Mark Glenn entitled ‘Old Wineskins’ which can be found at www.crescentandcross.com.
The author can be reached at mrkglenn@yahoo.com
Interview Mark Glenn!
"If you have a media outlet or know of a media outlet that is interested in interviewing Mark Glenn regarding his books and/or his articles, please feel free to contact him. We are actively trying to get this information out to quickly and effectively as possible."
Mr. Mark Glenn would be an excellent interviewee on Goyfire.
.
__________________
[url=http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=944_1216676169]/url]
Posted : 22/05/2006 5:01 am
Great! More kissing of Arab arses.
Please note... my enemy who also dislikes my other enemy is still not my friend.
Europe has been fighting muslims for over 1,000 years... and we'll probably fight them for another 1,000 years.
Posted : 22/05/2006 5:38 am
Topic starter
The website is a Christian-Muslim "understanding" site but I thought most of the points were worthwhile.
As far as the enemy of my enemy... I dunno. Has to be done carefully but when you got very few allies, you got very few choices. WN in America has no allies at all.
I doubt Islam as a whole will be much use in the fight coming up between Europeans, the zogsters, and the growing Asiatic economic supremacy. When that starts rolling we'll forget about the rags real fast. Powerful enemies tend to take the mind off the squirts.
“When I get re-elected I'm going to fuck the Jews" -- Jimmy Carter, 1980.
Posted : 22/05/2006 12:04 pm
The website is a Christian-Muslim "understanding" site but I thought most of the points were worthwhile.
As far as the enemy of my enemy... I dunno. Has to be done carefully but when you got very few allies, you got very few choices. WN in America has no allies at all.
I doubt Islam as a whole will be much use in the fight coming up between Europeans, the zogsters, and the growing Asiatic economic supremacy. When that starts rolling we'll forget about the rags real fast. Powerful enemies tend to take the mind off the squirts.
Moslems INSIDE white nations...enemies.
Moslems OUTSIDE white nations...not (necessarily) enemies. Potential allies at the present time, potential enemies in the long-run. The future is a fuzzy place.
White agenda: 1) Kick the moslems OUT of the white nations
2) Join with moslem nations in the struggle against world-wide jewish domination of both white nations and moslem nations.
The man who believes that he has free will is more easily controlled since he will never think to look for the chains--Burrhus
[color="Red"]The jews are a problem--not our ONLY or SOLE problem, not responsible for EVERY problem faced by gentiles, not some ALL-POWERFUL race that we shouldn't bother trying to resist, not an EXCUSE for avoiding responsibilty for problems of our own making --but nonetheless, A REAL, SERIOUS PROBLEM.--Burrhus
Posted : 22/05/2006 3:49 pm
Topic starter
Moslems INSIDE white nations...enemies.
Moslems OUTSIDE white nations...not (necessarily) enemies. Potential allies at the present time, potential enemies in the long-run. The future is a fuzzy place.
White agenda: 1) Kick the moslems OUT of the white nations
2) Join with moslem nations in the struggle against world-wide jewish domination of both white nations and moslem nations.
Sure agreeable, but I was whizzing through John Birdman Bryant's site and he posted Luke O'Farrell's latest that just hits the nail on the head.
Especially note the section in red!
“Let Them Eat Kike!”
Place Your Trust In Us, You Cretinsby Luke O'Farrell
If I were more of a sadist, I’d wish that I were more of a sadist. As it is, I’m not enjoying the last days of Tony Blair the way many others are. I’d much rather see the downfall of the scheming sheenies who have manipulated him: Peter “Prince of Darkness” Mandelson and Michael “Lord Cashpoint” Levy, for example. Someone as dim as Blair has been putty in their hands and if it weren’t for the Jew-filter clamped firmly over Western politics, such a sorry specimen of the White race would never have got near the top in the first place.
As it is, only sorry specimens get through the Jew-filter: if you won’t lie and cheat for the Chosen Ones, you have as much chance of succeeding in politics as Zimbabwe has of landing a man on Mars. Bliar is the most prominent example, but there are countless more race-traitors in the British government whose chief talent is to keep a straight face while spinning the lies that will supposedly lead us to a multi-racial Jewtopia:[INDENT]Schoolchildren should be taught “traditional British values” as part of an attempt to challenge extremism and promote a more cohesive society, the higher education minister, Bill Rammell, will say today. Under the proposals, all 11 to 16-year-olds will learn about free speech and democracy in the UK, as well as the contribution made by different communities. Mr Rammell will announce a six-month review of the school curriculum by a leading headteacher to see how best “core British values” can be incorporated into the school timetable.
Speaking at South Bank University, Mr Rammell will say the UK is a strong multicultural and multifaith society, but to prosper it must focus on shared “core values”. These include the tradition of free speech][/INDENT]Can you keep a straight face listening to this guff? You shouldn’t be able to. After all, what is the point of teaching values that are already “central and common” to us all? Are Muslim children going to be taught that water flows downhill and that politicians are lying whenever their lips move? Of course not. As soon as you admit the need to teach something, you admit that it isn’t “central and common”. Islam has no tradition of free speech, let alone of “freedom, democracy and liberty”, and if Bill Rammell wants to sample the “incredible strength and richness” of our multi-cultural diversity, he ought to go and live in one of the Muslim ghettos that pockmark Britain.
After the ghettos’ inhabitants have extended one of their traditional ten- or fifteen-to-one “Welcome the Whitey” ritual greetings, Bill might start to change his mind about the Joys of Diversity:[INDENT]Machete Mob in Race Hate Attack
A man whose head was sliced open with a machete by a racist mob as he tried to protect two young women has been left paralysed down one side. Tower Hamlets police say the gang attack is being treated as racially motivated. John Payne and two friends were viciously set upon by a gang of Asian youths wielding machetes and metal bars in Stepney on April 8. At around 11.30 pm that night, John was walking two young female friends home after an evening out. The trouble started when John, friends Sarah O’Leary and Jenny Curran, and Jenny’s brother Denny turned into the car park of Dagobert House, off Jamaica Street.
A gang of between six and nine Asian youths were waiting in the car park. They shouted racist insults at John and his friends, who told them to be quiet. They were then set upon by the gang, which swelled to a mob of 20 as other Asian youths rushed to join in the beating. Despite John and Denny’s attempts to protect her, Jenny was repeatedly punched and kicked, and struck on the head with a metal pole. Denny and John were both hacked around the head with machetes, leaving John with a deep wound. John was taken to intensive care at the Royal London Hospital. He is now paralysed down one side of his body, and has slurred speech and memory loss. He has regained some movement, but it is still uncertain whether he will be able to work again. (East London Advertiser, 3rd May 2006)
[/INDENT]But what are the chances that one of the people responsible for flooding Britain with aliens actually has to suffer the consequences like that? Vanishingly small, at least in the short term. JuLabour don’t care what we suffer because they don’t think they’ll have to suffer it themselves, and they’re still trying to keep us quiet by lying. Take the suicide-bombings in London on 7th July 2006:[INDENT]The Clues that MI5 Missed and the Unanswered Questions
• Mohammad Sidique Khan led the 7/7 bombers. His phone number was logged by MI5 in 2003 after he was contacted by a known terror suspect already being monitored by the security services. The two men talked about arranging meetings but this was never followed up. Why?
• The following year Khan and Shehzad Tanweer, another 7/7 bomber, were bugged over a number of months by MI5 talking about a separate alleged plot to blow up targets in the UK. One of the bugs was placed in a car Khan was driving, yet MI5 says it did not have the “resources” to identify either man. Is this credible?
• Khan and Tanweer visited terror training camps in Pakistan in 2003 and 2004. Their trips were not monitored, say the security services, despite the war on terror being in full flow. Why did MI6, which has substantial resources in Islamabad, fail to pick them up? Why were they not clocked at British ports? (The Sunday Times, 14th May 2006)
[/INDENT]Why? Well, I can suggest a good answer for all of those questions. It wasn’t because MI5 and MI6 were incompetent but because they were overwhelmed. Tracking potential terrorists in Muslim-enriched Britain must be a lot like tracking potential rapists in black-run South Africa. In other words, there are so many it has to be a matter of guesswork and luck. The British intelligence services have some very powerful computers and some very sophisticated software at their disposal, but where Muslim gang-bangers are concerned they’re probably just as well off relying on much older technology:[INDENT]“A Mohammad Sidique Khan, sir. Another of our vibrant Muslim community. We’ve recorded him discussing the prospect of enriching us with a explosion or two. Should we investigate further? What’s that, sir? Roll the dice? Hold on, please... Five and three, sir... Very well, sir. I’ll put him in the ‘Action Pending’ pile.” [/INDENT]That’s probably isn’t too far from the truth, but maybe if MI5 had taken more notice of the Fantastic Four who murdered fifty-five people on 7/7, another Fantastic Four might have murdered even more on another day. Bliar and his government obviously know much more than they are telling us, and they’re still trying to use lies and spin to keep Britain’s racial time-bomb from exploding. It won’t work and the longer we pretend the bomb isn’t ticking, the more people are going to be crowded around it when it goes off. I’m concerned about Whites first and foremost, but I don’t welcome the prospect of Muslims suffering unnecessarily either, which is why I want us to start repatriation as soon as possible. The longer we let the situation fester, the worse off everyone is going to be. It’s already clear that very large numbers are prepared to leave:[INDENT]Two-Thirds Of Muslims Consider Leaving UK
Hundreds of thousands of Muslims have thought about leaving Britain after the London bombings, according to a new poll. The figure illustrates how widespread fears are of an anti-Muslim backlash following the July 7 bombings carried out by British born suicide bombers. Nearly two-thirds of Muslims told pollsters that they had thought about their future in Britain after the attacks, with 63% saying they had considered whether they wanted to remain in the UK. Older Muslims were more uneasy about their future, with 67% of those 35 or over having contemplated their future home country compared to 61% among those 34 or under. Britain’s Muslim population is estimated at 1.6 million, with 1.1 million over 18, meaning more than half a million may have considered the possibility of leaving. (The Guardian, 26th July 2005)[/INDENT]Paying them to go back where they belong would leave both sides better off. As an extra incentive, we could even give them Tony Blair and the other JuLabour cheerleaders for the war in Iraq to put on trial in their homelands, while American Whites do the same with Bush and his neo-con puppet-masters. After all, both Britain and America are suffering from the same disease. It’s called Jew-flu and it induces the madness described here by Pat Buchanan:[INDENT]Historians will one day marvel that, as their Southwest was slipping away from the United States – demographically, linguistically and culturally – Americans were fighting to keep Iraq together. Remarkable. Foreigners are invading and occupying Arizona, while Americans are fighting for Anbar province. [/INDENT]Foreigners are invading and occupying Britain too, while our soldiers fight for Basra province. The best way to understand this lunacy is to ask “Cui bono?” – “Who benefits?” The answer, of course, is: “Jui bono!” – “Jews benefit!” Whites fight non-whites in the Middle East so Israel’s power increases, while non-whites fight Whites in America and Europe so the West’s power decreases. Jews have long seen the world as their goyster: it’s full of gullible goyim to deceive, drain of blood, and destroy.
That’s why one clear message rings down more than two millennia of Western history: “Jews are poison!” Ignoring this message has been the biggest mistake we’ve ever made and the message now sniggered behind the hands of race-traitors like Bush and Blair is: “Let them eat kike!” But there’s reason for hope. Jews and their shabbas goys have tried to hold back reality with a dam made of lies, but the dam is leaking badly in a dozen places. The more it leaks, the weaker it grows; and the weaker it grows, the more it leaks. When it finally collapses, there won’t be room in the Jew-canoe for the present gang of traitors, criminals and parasites to ride out the flood.
LUKE O'FARRELL
http://www.heretical.com/ofarrell/jewflu.html
“When I get re-elected I'm going to fuck the Jews" -- Jimmy Carter, 1980.
Posted : 23/05/2006 1:53 am
This article explains why it’s appropriate to hate ALL jews. 
Random Thoughts
By Barbra-renée Brighenti
5-15-06
About the controversy revolving around the use of the word ALL ~ as in the term “all jews”, some people have been tearing their hair out in mock indignation, while others have been warning about the guaranteed backlash and ridicule by well, let’s say, hmm, all jews.
“It will be just another excuse used to annihilate your argument”, I have been told by well meaning souls. But when we use the term” all Nazis”, is there a murmur? Should I rephrase and say most Nazis, implying that there were/are some good Nazis? That alone I fear would cause an outrage.
It is implied and accepted and thus reiterated that it was ALL Nazis, which is then translated into The Nazis, and whether these people were conscious or ignorant of what was being done in their name, we have left them no room to split hairs, and lump them all together for their crimes against humanity. But again, did all Nazis commit these crimes? By being silent to the crimes they witnessed but not participants of, can they be excused from those crimes in our minds eye? By saying they had no direct knowledge of these crimes, are they let off of the hook? How about the ones who ran the camps and said they were just following orders? Or the Nazis who only spread the propaganda, or ran the trains, or taught school, or just gave money to the cause, are they exempt? How about the Nazis who suggest that they didn’t agree with some of the crimes being committed in their name, but they were part of a society, a tribe that had been victimized by the Treaty of Versailles, and were fighting to stay alive? Or worse, the ones who believed they were a chosen people who had the human right to dominate according to their own rules?
How about having our gaze taken away from the collective action and impact of this “tribe of All Nazis’, and center upon the few heroic efforts of tribe members who spoke out against their own tribe. Do a few written articles by tribe members against the tribe override and diminish the term All Nazis? Will we accept all are presumed innocent until each and every person can be proved guilty? Will they be excused when we find out that they are still confessed Nazis, believing in many of the tribe’s beliefs, but only objecting to how these beliefs are carried out? That the belief in being “chosen” is still alive and well, but the objection is only to how the whip is used against the un-chosen?
Or how about the members of the tribe of Nazis who excuse, diminish or try to erase a few facts about the Nazis, to throw themselves and their group into a more favorable light? Or better yet, how about if esteemed members of the tribe of Nazis take over others countries media and whitewashed their own history? Or make brilliant rationalizations that it wasn’t the Nazis at all, but pretend Nazis? Or that it was Illuminate or NOW or Skull and Bones groups that had high jacked and manipulated the Nazi movement and now they, the Nazis, were being stuck with the bad rap?
How about the Nazis who say they aren’t Nazis now? Never believed in it from the get go? Or were just brought up as Nazis and never took it serious? Or that their family members were Nazis and they are sweet people? Or that they are/were Nazis and poor and hard working and just like everyone else? That they were afraid of saying they were not-Nazis, because of the Nazis backlash? Are these ones excused? How about the ones who say we are not Nazis, but members of the National Socialist German Workers Party? By changing a name, or using a former name instead of the present name people associate them with, does this make them not really Nazis? Are the ‘new named’ ones excused?
Can we accept the argument that Nazis had a right to murder, lie, steal and cheat if it is based upon their belief system? How about if their reasoning is that they do what they do, because no-one likes them? So they are Nazis for self-defense? And then victims of anti-Nazism? That any where they go, in any culture, there is always anti-Nazism? Is that worthy of your sympathy? That Nazis are victims of anti-Nazism? And if you brought up their crimes against humanity and were accused of anti-Nazism? Would this be ok? Does it make it alright? Because now we have the perpetrators crying victim, so is it ok to forgive them? Can we stigmatize all Nazis for the faults of many? How about the few innocent? What about if they had a right to march in your neighborhood? Would you feel ok? How about if you were told that these are ‘the innocent Nazis ‘? Does it make it alright? And if your president was photographed with a Nazi flag behind him? Because it represented some of the innocent Nazis? Would you call it patriotic? Free speech, part of the constitution? How about if the Nazis told you they were secular Nazis, not political Nazis? How about if every Nazi film showed them to be good Nazis? Every article, good Nazis? Every TV sit-com, they were the good guys? To protect the “good Nazis” image? Would your world be turned upside down?
And this tribe of innocent Nazi victims, can they go home again? To Poland, Russia, France, Palestine, America? Anywhere and everywhere that their chosen feet touched? How about if it was in their rulebook, the right to return? Because they are chosen? It says so right there, but unfortunately only Nazis can read the fine print.Would you buy it?
Enter the lexicon, and tell me if Nasi should be used instead of Nazi. And how does it make you feel?
__________________
[url=http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=944_1216676169]/url]
Posted : 24/05/2006 12:16 am
Topic starter
Seriously I plumb forgot John Kaminski's girlfriend wrote for this same site. I'm going to have a cup of cocoa right now and read some more of her stuff.
Kaminski admitted in an essay that Barbra-renée knows more about the Jew issue than anyone he ever met. Coming from John that's not at all bad. She must be a prodigy!
“When I get re-elected I'm going to fuck the Jews" -- Jimmy Carter, 1980.
Posted : 24/05/2006 1:22 am
She must be a prodigy!
I believe you're right 
Lemmings have no difficulty believing ALL Nazis are bad. But they would never extend that sort of thinking to jewry.
__________________
[url=http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=944_1216676169]/url]
Posted : 24/05/2006 1:42 am