Yesterday my wife called me and told me that she’d just seen an article in the New York Daily News that stated; and displayed images, of an anti-circumcision comic book that is being produced in California. When I got the chance I took a peek at the Daily News; New York’s version of the Soviet daily ‘Pravda’, and I burst out laughing right then and there. (1)

The comic book; called ‘Foreskin Man’, (2) carries a cartoon version of a blonde; obviously Aryan, superhero fighting a corpulent, bloody beast; ‘Dr. Mutilator’, that could reasonably be interpreted as a jew. The jew; of course, is dressed in a doctor’s coat with blood spattered across it.

Another image carries a malevolent and gaunt (alright somewhat unrealistic there as most rabbis of any denomination seem to be habitually obese) Hasidic rabbi; ‘Monster Mohel’, with a satanic grin on his face obviously approves of the bodily mutilation of all and sundry. Who has a jewish goon; complete with a kippah, side-locks and an uzi, called ‘Jorah’ who helps him and Dr. Mutilator in their quest to lop foreskins off helpless male children.

The group responsible for this praiseworthy foray of anti-jewish imagery into the world of modern cartoons is called ‘MGMBill’ (2) based out of San Diego. ‘Foreskin Man’ is the brainchild of three people: Matthew Hess, Gledson Barreto and Ian Sokoliwski. Barreto seems to have written and designed the comic, while Sokoliwski took care of the colouration. (3)

Interestingly they are based out numerous different locales with Hess in San Diego, Barreto in Brazil and Sokoliwski in Canada, which suggests to my mind that all have a strong aversion to the rite of circumcision and forced mass circumcision in particular. From what I can see all three individuals involved have liberal credentials and quite probably are either pro-homosexual or have homosexual urges, but at the very least they are being logical in that belief system and opposing a barbaric practice in spite of all the pressure on them.

‘Foreskin Man’ is obviously a very clever bit of Public Relations in that it attracts a lot of attention to their cause and campaign. It is also fairly obvious that they expected to be called ‘anti-Semitic’ and almost seem to have counted on this fact by the obviously jewish imagery they are using. As Goebbels himself realised; and indeed this was the secret of much of his success as the Gauleiter of Berlin, one of the keys to a propaganda campaign is to get constantly talked about in the way you want to be discussed as that brings the oxygen of publicity to your cause.

The campaign for MGMBill is essentially part of the controversy surrounding San Franciscans sticking two fingers up at the self-chosen and demanding the jews follow the same laws and rules as everyone else by outlawing the barbaric practice of circumcision. This has caused the volume of kvetching in California to go up by several decibels as jews scream ‘anti-Semite’, ‘Nazis’, ‘holocaust’ in quick succession with little actual effect as the San Franciscans seem to be; for once, digging their heals in for the good guys and literally kicking the jews where their foreskins used to be.

The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith; who obviously have a vested interest in lopping off foreskins the practice of which gave birth to their name, thinks it has found the obvious way to ‘prove’ to everyone that this is a ‘Nazi conspiracy’ against jews (and the next ‘holocaust’ is round the corner if people don’t send them lots of money now) in ‘Foreskin Man’. So they have been redeploying their resources to character assassinate anyone and everyone who gets involved with the anti-circumcision bill as the Anti-Defamation League; rightly, believes that such actions are the ‘thin end of the wedge’ as it; along with other recent actions such as moves to ban the equally barbaric practice of Shechita, (4) gives a legal basis and precedent for future anti-jewish action.

The problem the Anti-Defamation League is now facing is two fold:

A) The drying up of the rivers of jewish gold that have sustained it for so long to such an extent that it is having to get on the ‘Charity Walk’ circuit and is trying to recruit gullible goyim to defend the jews by giving it money.

B) That they have called ‘anti-Semite’ too many times which has caused it to lose much of its previous vim and vigour as a charge.

Can the Anti-Defamation League adapt and overcome?

Possibly, but while the first problem is relatively easy to remedy: the second problem requires so massive a change and cutting back on the corporate strategy it has for so long successfully used that I doubt that the Anti-Defamation League will take the actions necessary to rectify the situation in their eyes.

In fact I would suggest that as time goes on we will see an increasingly frustrated Anti-Defamation League screaming ‘anti-Semitism’, ‘Nazi’ and ‘holocaust’ to a dwindling audience of rabid Israel Firsters, while; in fact, public intellectual discourse begins to accept some basic anti-Semitic positions much as it has already done with the popularisation of the ‘Israel Lobby’ argument.

It appears that for all their frothing and spittle-flecked rage and paranoia: the jews might have got this one somewhat correct.

Anti-Semitism is back and this time it is seriously pissed off.

(1) http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2011/06/04/2011-06-04_jewish_groups_blast_foreskin_man_comic_books_overly_antisemitic_images_on_circum.html [Last Accessed: 04/06/2011]
(2) http://foreskinman.com/ [Last Accessed: 04/06/2011]
(3) http://mgmbill.org/ [Last Accessed: 04/06/2011]
(4) The kosher method of slaughtering an animal.

This was originally published at the following address: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2011/06/adventures-of-foreskin-man.html