Yeah, the fag population is definitely higher than the WN population. Can fags do any wrongs or "despicabilities" in JOGZOG or on jewTV? Hardly. They are our biggest heroes next to niggers.

Without faggots, we wouldn't know how to dress or interior decorate.

Doesn't suprise me about Orlando. Disney as been corrupted by fags and Disney World is their (Disney's) shrine.

Most heterosexuals seem to tragically miss the point of the Real homosexual life style and agenda.

Like the singer Annetta Bryant once said:

"heterosexuals propagate and homosexuals recruit"

for which she was vilified and her career destroyed.

Queers in any package are despicable,yet today many are seen as sort of revolutionary figures and often find full acceptance in the strangest places.

Many to most normal white males may find disfavor with male homosexuals ;but at the same time find female homosexuals unique and interesting in some deluded sexual manner of ignorance and stupidity.

Many females often find a odd social kinship with male homosexuals as a nonthreatening/ sexually unaggressive male;which in reality is totally false and deceptive.

The main problem with homosexuals ,as I see it, is they negate the generally prime objective of human advancement for their own benefit at an unknown cost to everyone, for an unspecified time period, with consequences that may or may not destroy the future of human endeavors(big problem).They are essentially bystanders in the real work and effort of life-children.

Most white humans labor for their offspring,as apparently do most Asians.Few nonwhites actually consider the future consequences of their children success or failure after their initial birth.

This inconsideration and selfish disregard for human future development has been the main departing problem,among many others ,that makes white people distrust,dislike and hate nonwhites.

Yet it is this very "problem" (the inability to actually give a shit about anyone or anything except yourself) that unites the nonwhite segments of humanity with the homosexual communities.

Fruits in any public job or employment segment of the work force are constantly on the look out for "recruits".Queers do not remotely consider future consequences for future generations ;as is the the sum of most white efforts and labors.Consequently,queers ,as well as most nonwhites, act and preform their efforts for themselves alone and their own personal benefit ,pleasure and desires;very much unlike most sane normal heterosexual individuals.

The result being that ;white people are constantly viewed as a problem to the advancement of the homosexual/nonwhite agendas ,which only passingly acknowledges the acts of propagation and completely misses the standing objectives of White Advancement-for all future humanity.

Doesn't suprise me about Orlando. Disney as been corrupted by fags and Disney World is their (Disney's) shrine.

Exactly,you beat me to it.It's a veritable fag mecca.

These stats are misleading. If you include bisexuals, it's almost 40% for San Francisco proper. Bisexuality is far more common amongst degenerates than straight out faggotry.

RE: SUNOFSPARTA

This one of the best posts that I've ever read on this forum regarding the homosexual problem! Great job!

Most heterosexuals seem to tragically miss the point of the Real homosexual life style and agenda.

Like the singer Annetta Bryant once said:

"heterosexuals propagate and homosexuals recruit"

for which she was vilified and her career destroyed.

Queers in any package are despicable,yet today many are seen as sort of revolutionary figures and often find full acceptance in the strangest places.

Many to most normal white males may find disfavor with male homosexuals ;but at the same time find female homosexuals unique and interesting in some deluded sexual manner of ignorance and stupidity.

Many females often find a odd social kinship with male homosexuals as a nonthreatening/ sexually unaggressive male;which in reality is totally false and deceptive.

The main problem with homosexuals ,as I see it, is they negate the generally prime objective of human advancement for their own benefit at an unknown cost to everyone, for an unspecified time period, with consequences that may or may not destroy the future of human endeavors(big problem).They are essentially bystanders in the real work and effort of life-children.

Most white humans labor for their offspring,as apparently do most Asians.Few nonwhites actually consider the future consequences of their children success or failure after their initial birth.

This inconsideration and selfish disregard for human future development has been the main departing problem,among many others ,that makes white people distrust,dislike and hate nonwhites.

Yet it is this very "problem" (the inability to actually give a shit about anyone or anything except yourself) that unites the nonwhite segments of humanity with the homosexual communities.

Fruits in any public job or employment segment of the work force are constantly on the look out for "recruits".Queers do not remotely consider future consequences for future generations ;as is the the sum of most white efforts and labors.Consequently,queers ,as well as most nonwhites, act and preform their efforts for themselves alone and their own personal benefit ,pleasure and desires;very much unlike most sane normal heterosexual individuals.

The result being that ;white people are constantly viewed as a problem to the advancement of the homosexual/nonwhite agendas ,which only passingly acknowledges the acts of propagation and completely misses the standing objectives of White Advancement-for all future humanity.

For fun around here we go downtown by the river and piss off the dykes.

Have to second Brutus on SOS's post, except for this:

Many to most normal white males may find disfavor with male homosexuals ;but at the same time find female homosexuals unique and interesting in some deluded sexual manner of ignorance and stupidity.

I think a lot of these guys ignore the few real-life dykes they encounter, in favor of mass-media images like you find in porn. Those porn "lesbians" are just hookers doing it for the money. Feminine "lesbians" exist, but they are rare and I have seen them converted. They're usually just confused girls who flip once a decent guy pays some attention.

My own theory is that guys enjoy seeing a lot of female activity, so the more women the better, even if no man is present. Plus it is probably subconsciously encouraging. If a woman can please a woman, then imagine what *I* could do! I guess it helps a guy feel potent, to see a female excited by a mere female.

ETA I found the percentages interesting. Remember that fags and friends have tried for many years to have us all believe that they make up a minimum of 10% of the population. Now we hear that the fag mecca is only about 8% fag? The gay capitol ov USA has less gays by % than the average US population does?

Of course your average vnn reader already knew the 10% claim was bullshit, but it's nice to see it shown once again.

These stats are misleading. If you include bisexuals, it's almost 40% for San Francisco proper. Bisexuality is far more common amongst degenerates than straight out faggotry.

Well, for one thing, survey questions can be designed to produce different results. Not knowing what methodology is involved, I'm inclined to assume the questions were designed to elicit positive responses from sexual inverts.

As such, the result is unsurprising. One might expect larger percentages based on the screaming fags' insistence on the reaility of the "1 in 10" myth, but no, the reality is only "1 in 12" in these pervert meccas.

Website of the Williams Institute here: http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/home.html

To give you some of the flavor of propaganda they produce, here is

The Real Story of U.S. Hate Crimes Statistics: An Empirical Analysis (pdf file)
by William B. Rubenstein

Since 1990, the federal government has collected data on hate crimes reported throughout the United States. To date, the conventional account of that data has simply been to report that racial hate crimes are the most frequently reported type, followed by religious hate crimes, and sexual orientation hate crimes. While this conventional story is not technically wrong, Professor Rubenstein argues in this Article that it is not the real story the data tell.

Undertaking the first comprehensive empirical analysis of this data, Professor Rubenstein develops a new account of hate crimes in the United States. First, the Article pierces the neutral categories ["Neutral" is a PC code-word meaning "numbers lie ... when the results don't match what 'we' know." --L.D.] (race, religion, sexual orientation) to demonstrate that three sub-groups&#8212]blacks, Jewish people, and gay people—report, by far, the most hate crimes. Second, Professor Rubenstein adjusts the raw data to account for the differing population sizes of targeted groups: per capita, gay people report the greatest number of hate crimes, followed by Jewish people and blacks, these three groups reporting hate crimes at greater per capita rates then all other groups. [Whingers, all. So normal whites suffer hate crimes in silence, unlike fags who scream bloody murder whenever anyone makes fun of their lisping or limp wrists or female mustaches. And, as we know, a large percentage of 'crimes' reported by niggers and kikes are hoaxes.--L.D.] Third, gay people are especially like to report personal—as opposed to property-based—hate crimes.

A final Part of the Article presents the first scholarly analysis of the staggering growth of anti-Islamic and anti-Arab hate crimes after September 11, 2001. The methodology of this Article enables a per capita perspective on this increase, showing that Muslims and Arabs reported hate crimes in 2001 at rates even greater than those at which gay people, Jewish people, and blacks have reported hate crimes over the past half-decade. While this post-9/11 spike leveled off in 2002, Muslims and Arabs are still reporting hate crimes at very high rates.

As Congress intended hate crimes data to assist in designing public policy initiatives, Professor Rubenstein concludes by calling on Congress to respond to what the data actually demonstrate.

Most heterosexuals seem to tragically miss the point of the Real homosexual life style and agenda.

Like the singer Annetta Bryant once said:

"heterosexuals propagate and homosexuals recruit"

for which she was vilified and her career destroyed.

Anita Bryant.