Carter Book Slaps Israel With ‘Apartheid’ Tag, Provides Ammo to GOP
Jennifer Siegel | Tue. Oct 17, 2006
As Republicans step up their efforts to paint Democrats as increasingly hostile toward Israel, former President Jimmy Carter is releasing a book on the Middle East, titled “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.”Judging from an advance review manuscript of the new work, published by Simon & Schuster and set for release November 14, Carter places the bulk of the blame on Israel for its continuing conflict with the Palestinians. But critics of the former president probably will be most offended by his use of the word “apartheid” in the book’s title and text.
Israel’s current policy in the territories, Carter writes in the book’s summary, is “a system of apartheid, with two peoples occupying the same land but completely separated from each other, with Israelis totally dominant and suppressing violence by depriving Palestinians of their basic human rights.” In a separate passage in the advance draft, the former president stated that “Israel’s continued control and colonization of Palestinian land have been the primary obstacles to a comprehensive peace agreement in the Holy Land.”
In addition, Carter takes what is being interpreted by some critics as a swipe at the pro-Israel lobby. “Because of powerful political, economic, and religious forces in the United States, Israeli government decisions are rarely questioned or condemned,” the former president writes.
Carter’s book comes as the Republican Jewish Coalition is already waging a nationwide media campaign to convince Jewish voters that the Democratic Party no longer can be counted on to provide unflinching support for Israel. (See story on Page A6.) One of the recent RJC ads features a large image of Carter and quotes the former president as saying, “I don’t think Israel has any legal or moral justification for their massive bombing of the entire nation of Lebanon.”
Simon & Schuster spokeswoman Elizabeth Hayes confirmed the substance of the quotes from Carter’s book, but said that the wording could change in the final edition.
With less than three weeks left before Election Day, Jewish Democrats have been quick both to disavow Carter’s views and to assert that Carter is a marginal figure within the party on the issue, despite being a former president and a Nobel Peace Prize winner. At the same time, however, the Democratic National Committee included him in a list of past pro-Israel presidents in an advertisement this week that was aimed at shoring up support among Jewish voters. The ad features a 1977 quote from Carter describing the “special relationship” between the United States and Israel, and saying that “it’s absolutely crucial that no one in our country or around the world ever doubt that our number one commitment in the Middle East is to protect the right of Israel to exist, to exist permanently, and to exist in peace.”
The RJC’s executive director, Matt Brooks, told the Forward that he has yet to see Carter’s new book; however, he seemed confident that it would provide additional ammunition for his organization’s campaign to woo Jewish voters.
“We certainly have not shied away from shining a light on some of his misguided and outrageous comments about Israel in the past, so we certainly have to see what this book holds,” Brooks said. “Obviously we will look to key Democratic leaders and hear what they have to say about it. So far, there’s been nothing but silence on the part of the Democratic establishment in terms of holding Carter accountable.”
The book was originally slated to be released November 1 — six days prior to this year’s congressional elections — but now it will be available in stores November 14, according to Hayes, the Simon & Schuster spokeswoman.
Jewish Democrats say that they were pushing for a later release date. But, according to Hayes, the date was pushed back to allow Carter time to work in more material from last summer’s conflict between Israel and Hezbollah.
Democrats involved in efforts to boost Jewish support were quick to criticize Carter’s views. “I disagree with President Carter fundamentally,” said Rep. Steve Israel, a New York Democrat who is leading the efforts of House Democrats to reach out to Jewish voters and donors. “The reason for the Palestinian plight is the Palestinians. Their leadership has no regard for the quality of life for their people and no capability of providing security or enforcing peace, and they have no one to blame but themselves.”
Israel added that the “book clearly does not reflect the direction of the party; it reflects the opinion of one man.”
“Democrats who support Jimmy Carter’s views on Israel? Now that’s a convention you could hold in a phone booth,” wrote Ira Forman, executive director of the National Democratic Jewish Council, in an e-mail to the Forward. “Jimmy Carter is out of the mainstream of the Democratic Party when it comes to his views on Israel.” Aaron Miller, a former State Department official who has consistently advocated a greater American role in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, said that Carter’s book would not influence key decision makers in the administration. But he added, “the one thing that I assure you is that Carter’s book will be read” by a wider audience.
Carter has a “demonstrated track record of success,” said Miller, now a public policy scholar at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, referring to the Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty that the former president helped broker at Camp David in 1978. “He’s the only American president that’s succeeded in brokering a permanent status agreement between Arabs and Israelis, the only one, and you know, he deserves an enormous amount of credit for that, whatever his current and latest views are — and I don’t agree with a lot of them, on the Israel-Arab issue.”
http://www.forward.com/articles/carter-book-slaps-israel-with-%e2%80%98apartheid%e2%80%99-tag/
Simon & Schuster publishing a book critical of Israel and the jewish lobby...hmmm, something smells funny...
Simon & Schuster publishing a book critical of Israel and the jewish lobby...hmmm, something smells funny...
Well, Carter is criticizing Isreal, that is true.
But the idea Carter is protecting and reinforcing is the evil of apartheid states.
Yet, that is what we White Nationalists want: political and racial separation.
Now, if Carter were to come out and say apartheid states are a good thing... well, that would be something.
A White World (Pierce's Vision for our Race):
Simon & Schuster publishing a book critical of Israel and the jewish lobby...hmmm, something smells funny...
Especially since Simon & Shuster is owned by one Murray Rothstein, aka Sumner Redstone, who owns MTV, VH1, and the now race-mixing country station CMT as parts of his Viacom media empire.
"From my experience in studying the Jews through direct observation and the study of their Talmud and literature is this: You can't think too badly about the Jews because no matter how badly you think that they are, in fact and in reality, they are much, much worse than you could ever imagine."... Banjo Billy
Knowing that israel is pro-apartheid is like knowing that leaves change color in autumn. No huge relevation there, but at least it was said and hopefully stimulated the brains of the lemmings.
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him...." ------ John 8:44
It's true that a Democrat saying this just reinforces the GOPer mindset that Israel must be a good guy if Democrats don't like it, but nevertheless, the stark difference between racial policy there and racial policy here needs to be demonstrated as often as possible. We need some Walts and Mearsheimers to do a study on why the same "leaders" support racism in Izzyland and anti-racism in America.
IOW, this might have some effect if it were newsworthy regularly.
With Jews, We Lose.
“Because of powerful political, economic, and religious forces in the United States, Israeli government decisions are rarely questioned or condemned,” the former president writes.
Translation: "The United States has a Zionist Occupied Government."
"Go, Nazis, Go!"
“Because of powerful political, economic, and religious forces in the United States, Israeli government decisions are rarely questioned or condemned,” the former president writes.
Translation: "The United States has a Zionist Occupied Government."
Amen.
Now, if we could just translate that gospel into Evangalese.
With Jews, We Lose.
“Because of powerful political, economic, and religious forces in the United States, Israeli government decisions are rarely questioned or condemned,” the former president writes.
Translation: "The United States has a Zionist Occupied Government."
Oh, what a canard! 
Carter had four years as President to do something about Israeli "Apartheid" and of course did nothing. What the White trash scalawag says now is worthless.
Carter had four years as President to do something about Israeli "Apartheid" and of course did nothing. What the White trash scalawag says now is worthless.
That is true. I look at it as a hind sight is 20/20 thing. If he mentions regretting not doing something, then it may mean more. At least the message is out.
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him...." ------ John 8:44