Corrections union t...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Corrections union to protest county’s ‘anti-white’ affirmative-action official

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
508 Views
The Bobster
(@the-bobster)
Posts: 1146
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

http://nypost.com/2014/12/15/corrections-union-to-protest-countys-anti-white-affirmative-action-official/

Corrections union to protest county’s ‘anti-white’ affirmative-action official
By Josh Saul
December 15, 2014 | 2:37am


Andreaus Guilty walks outside his home in Uniondale on Dec. 14.
Photo: VICTORALCORN.COM

Long Island correction officers will mass outside the Nassau County Jail on Monday morning to protest anti-white Facebook posts made by the county’s $80,000-a-year affirmative-action specialist, The Post has learned.

The Nassau County correction officers union has already filed a federal EEOC complaint against Andreaus Guilty, who works for the county sheriff, over social-network posts with titles such as, “Racist NYPD CRACKERS,” “Police are protected by a system of white supremacy” and “Dis not your country pale face.”

The correction officers union says hundreds of their members will mass outside the jail to call for the firing of Guilty, who posted ugly statements specifically about their members such as, “Stop telling me about the stress officers go thru,” and saying they shouldn’t take the job if they’re “scared.”

He called the officers people “that got bullied in high school,” who “want to be a steroid rage rambo.”

Nassau County Sheriff’s Correction Officers Benevolent Association president John Jaronczyk said he was “appalled and disgusted” by Guilty’s rants.

“His posts are disturbing. He specifically talks about my officers, who he’s supposed to be helping,” Jaronczyk told The Post. “Now there is no EEO oversight at the jail because none of my officers will go to him.”

Guilty did not respond to messages seeking comment.


How do you spell relief?

Here's how: This message is hidden because N.M. Valdez is on your shit list.

 
Posted : 15/12/2014 4:17 pm
Share: