Free speech 'schola...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Free speech 'scholars' say Alex Jones is not protected

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
292 Views
Ironguard1940
(@ironguard1940)
Posts: 1861
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/free-speech-scholars-to-alex-jones-you’re-not-protected/ar-BBLCSS7?ocid=spartandhp

Quote:

In defending himself, Mr. Jones has claimed in court papers that his allegations concerning Mr. Gilmore were “opinion, not statements of fact” and that Infowars is a “freewheeling” website, “in which hyperbole and diatribe reign as the preferred tools of discourse.” His viewers, Mr. Jones maintained, “expect an interview or monologue to be more free-flowing and opinionated and less precise in its use of language than an article or a book.”

So Alex Jones admits he is full of shit.

Quote:

The scholars were particularly scathing when it came to Mr. Jones’s contention that his videos on Infowars reflected nothing more than his beliefs. It would set a dangerous precedent, they said, if Judge Moon ruled on his behalf.
“It would allow unscrupulous news organizations to couch their language as ‘opinion’ and to mask their meaning with implication and insinuation,” the scholars wrote. That, they added, would leave “readers clear as to the message but avoiding all liability for defamatory remarks. This should not be allowed and, in fact, is not allowed.”

BULLSHIT. The media is already allowed to print their opinion, which in many cases is an outright lie. A prime example is the false media narrative that the right started the violence at UtR and every rally they stage. A blind man can see that without antifa present at these rallies there is no violence. Yet the kikenmedia continues to print their lying horseshit. Why aren't the jewsmedia subject to these defamation lawsuits when they outright fucking LIE?


 
Posted : 07/08/2018 4:17 pm
Share: