http://www.overthrow.com/lsn/news.asp?articleID=10278
Apparently, former Washington Times reporter George Archibald is writing a book attacking the other editors and writers there as racists. He called me, and, after talking to him for about five minutes, I decided I didn't have much to say to him. That didn't stop him, though, from giving me an hour long diatribe on the internal politics of the Washington Times.
Mr Archibald, who has declared on the Huffington Post that he is "not a bigot" and "does not like bigots", tells me that John Tanton, Linda Chavez and Marian Coombs all referred him to this website, saying that they are all big fans of Overthrow.com. He told me that he wanted me "to bring the immigration issue together for him", then didn't give me the chance to get a word in edgewise. After about ten minutes, I just started blogging while he was talking instead.
I found the premise of his conversation highly unusual, so I asked a few questions to make sure he had his story straight. "Linda Chavez", I said, "told you she is a fan of Overthrow.com?" Chavez, for those who don't know, is a Republican Party Mexican who is married to a Jew. "Yes," Mr Archibald assured me, "She mentions you by name often. She's a huge fan."
I just didn't buy that. John Tanton I don't know -- I've never met him and never talked to him. Marian Coombs I had lunch with in the company of friends once five years ago and when I suggested the Moonies should hire hitmen to kill Charles Krauthammer, AM Rosenthal and Norman Podhoretz she excused herself from the lunch. There is only one person he mentioned who I actually am friends with, and I will not mention them to keep them from being accosted by other Washington politicos.
Between five and ten minutes of talking to him, asking him several times what I could do for him, and not getting a straight answer and getting a line of bull instead, I Googled him to find out his angle. That's when I found this story:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/george-archibald/top-washington-times_b_30565.html
Clearly, he is trying to slander several editors of the Washington Times by doing a "links and ties" story involving me. Once I realized that was his angle, I shut my mouth. I've known several of the employees at the Washington Times and Insight Magazine over the years -- and I have not followed any of their internal politics since I moved away from DC.
The only things that I did say very clearly was that, in my opinion, Marian Coombs was an extreme moderate on race and, in my view, philo-Semitic (I received the exclaimed answer "what?!?"). Ditto for Fran Coombs and the editorship of the Washington. Mr Archibald apparently didn't know that I broke up the Minuteman press conference in Washington, DC, because I felt they were not racist enough. In my view, the Washington Times is not sufficiently racist on immigration and any feigned racial material they publish is just to bring racists into the Republican Party, where there views can be moderated and watered down -- a pernicious form of anti-racism more vile than that of the left, one might say.
I also told him, after about forty minutes, that I don't consider myself right-wing or conservative, that I am a socialist, and that I voted for the Democratic Congress, whose multi-culturalist agenda I'm willing to tolerate as long they choke Bush's war efforts and most of what the Republicans are up to.
I think my words were lost on him.
The guy is clearly so caught up in Washington politics that he just doesn't have a clue as to what people really believe in this world. For me, debating the intricacies of Giuliani vs. McCain vs. Clinton vs. Obama is just stupid -- they're all controlled by the Jews, and there isn't a bit of difference between them. And I don't just say that -- I believe it, and I don't care, except that I don't think some nigger Kenyan tribesman can win the election.
In any case, the guy was a terrible interviewer and probably a great interview subject. He loves hearing himself talk, can't resist the pregnant pause, and could probably have been plugged for all sorts of gossip had I cared. I just don't. Washington, and the politicians and media there, make me sick.
.
"[color="DarkRed"]Be radical, have principles, [color="darkred"]be absolute, [color="darkred"]be that which the bourgeoisie calls an extremist: give yourself without counting or calculating, [color="darkred"]don't accept what they call ‘the reality of life' and act in such a way that you won't be accepted by that kind of ‘life', never abandon the principle of struggle."
-----
Oh, and read