Forum
- Home
- Forum
Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
Notice code words in article...poor=darkie /mexican...affluent=white. If there are going to be any abortions at all, it's best that they occur amongst those groups. Link at bottom to good pro-life website (Even if it is religious. There are few pro-life atheists, sadly.)
Guttmacher Report Says Abortions Up for Poor Women, Down for Affluent Email this article
Printer friendly page
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
May 5, 2006
New York, NY (LifeNews.com) -- Looking into the details of the new abortion report released by the Alan Guttmacher Institute, a Planned Parenthood affiliate, it says poor women are increasingly likely to get pregnant and have abortions while more affluent women are less likely.
Based on nationwide information gathered by the National Center for Health Statistics and other places, AGI reports that the rates of unplanned pregnancies for poor women, increased by almost 30 percent from 1994 to 2001 while they fell 20 percent for women in more affluent families.
Abortion rates also rose and fell for the same groups during the time period, even though abortions are on the decline as a whole nationwide.
"Clearly, something is changing, and it doesn't bode well in terms of unplanned pregnancies and abortions for poor women, in particular," Heather Boonstra, an AGI report author, tells the Washington Post.
But when asked why this was happening, Boonstra claimed it was because state and federal governments are shifting resources away from contraception and towards abstinence education.
Leslee Unruh, president and founder of the Abstinence Clearinghouse, told the Post she disagreed with that assessment.
"Programs for poor women are often so condescending, even degrading," she said. "They teach how to put on a condom rather than how to take control of their lives."
The study also found that abortions are occurring earlier in pregnancy but that poor women have abortions on average six days later than women who are more affluent.
The AGI study found there were 6.4 million pregnancies in the United States in 2001 and four million babies were born from them. There were 1.3 million abortions and 1.1 million miscarriages. (That's 25% of viable babies aborted--Burrhus)
The pregnancy were roughly divided in half between unintended and planned and unplanned pregnancies split in almost even numbers of abortions and births, the Post reported.
Printed from: http://www.lifenews.com/nat2240.html
The man who believes that he has free will is more easily controlled since he will never think to look for the chains--Burrhus
[color="Red"]The jews are a problem--not our ONLY or SOLE problem, not responsible for EVERY problem faced by gentiles, not some ALL-POWERFUL race that we shouldn't bother trying to resist, not an EXCUSE for avoiding responsibilty for problems of our own making --but nonetheless, A REAL, SERIOUS PROBLEM.--Burrhus
Posted : 06/05/2006 10:46 am
Abortion is a filthy thing. But what's on the agenda for those lefty-nutter abortion clinics is more muds and less whites while still having plenty of abortions.
Your land is only what you can take and hold.
Posted : 06/05/2006 12:24 pm
Abortion is a filthy thing. But what's on the agenda for those lefty-nutter abortion clinics is more muds and less whites while still having plenty of abortions.
On the contrary the elimination of weak children was practiced by our ancestors who would leave their unwanted off spring on a high and cold mount to let nature take its course.
Posted : 06/05/2006 12:57 pm
On the contrary the elimination of weak children was practiced by our ancestors who would leave their unwanted off spring on a high and cold mount to let nature take its course.
This is not the case with today’s typical abortion, where 90+% of the babies are perfectly viable and healthy. This has nothing to do with eugenics.
Rather then your suggestion, we should leave the weak parents off on a high and cold mount to let nature take its course. That’s of course, after we put a bullet in the back of their head.
The ink of the learned is as precious as the blood of the martyr. For one drop of ink may make millions think.
Posted : 06/05/2006 1:18 pm
On the contrary the elimination of weak children was practiced by our ancestors who would leave their unwanted off spring on a high and cold mount to let nature take its course.
This is not the case with today’s typical abortion, where 90+% of the babies are perfectly viable and healthy. This has nothing to do with eugenics.
Rather then your suggestion, we should leave the weak parents off on a high and cold mount to let nature take its course. That’s of course, after we put a bullet in the back of their head.
I take your point but we place too high a value on human life.
Posted : 06/05/2006 1:19 pm
Programs for poor women are often so condescending, even degrading," she said. "They teach how to put on a condom rather than how to take control of their lives."
What is the point in wasting time teaching abstinence to people who start having sex with they are 10 and popping them out at 13? Some people don't seem to have the ability to take control of their lives.
My views on abortion have changed drastically over the years.
With abortion no longer an issue people are still going to be practicing birth control and they will, in fact, probably be much more vigilant about doing everything they can to ensure they do not get pregnant. A change in abortion laws would do little, since it would not change the mindset that not having children is a good thing, and it certainly wouldn't change the irresponsible behaviors that lead to the abortion in most cases. Abortion is a good thing for many.
The majority of anti-abortionists are just as insane as anybody else, since they think it is a positive thing and will "fight" for every black crack baby, spic, and retard to come into the world.
FKA, Hitler Goddess, Starr
Posted : 06/05/2006 2:03 pm
RE:
Abortion is a good thing for many.
The majority of anti-abortionists are just as insane as anybody else, since they think it is a positive thing and will "fight" for every black crack baby, spic, and retard to come into the world.
There is no valid or acceptable reason to kill a healthy White child, with the exception of rape or incest or if the mother will die as a result of the birth.
As for all of the others, that is not my concern.
The ink of the learned is as precious as the blood of the martyr. For one drop of ink may make millions think.
Posted : 06/05/2006 4:02 pm
RE: Aryan Lord
I take your point but we place too high a value on human life.
Yes, some of them aren't worth the price of the lead used in the bullets needed to kill them.
The ink of the learned is as precious as the blood of the martyr. For one drop of ink may make millions think.
Posted : 06/05/2006 4:04 pm
RE:
There is no valid or acceptable reason to kill a healthy White child, with the exception of rape or incest or if the mother will die as a result of the birth.
As for all of the others, that is not my concern.
There is no valid or acceptable reason to kill a healthy white child I agree. It is particularily disgusting to think about the type of woman who could want to do this to her own child. It is also disturbing, though to think about this type of woman having the child and the child, more likely than not, growing up to be just like her.
FKA, Hitler Goddess, Starr
Posted : 06/05/2006 4:17 pm
Is there a significant percentage of White women using abortion clinics as a means of birth control?
I don't know the stats involved, but it would seem that abortion clinics would be more frequented by those looking to terminate the pregnancy for some specific biological reason.
But then, that may just be me thinking in terms of rational logical behaviour.
I do know there is a major problem with babies being born with drug addictions, physical defects, brains damaged by excessive alcohol consumption of the parents, etc.
If a healthy White woman is carrying a healthy White child, and for whatever reason does not want the child, there need be some type of organization that assists her through her pregnancy, and then places this healthy White child in a White family.
Anything else, who cares?
If lesser beings are choosing to have mentally/physically defective children, that is their problem.
Our problem is trying to stave off the mental/biological degeneracy of lesser cultures so that we may produce healthy intelligent and strong White children.
Our values are being destroyed on all fronts, and our children, both present and future, with them.
Posted : 06/05/2006 8:59 pm