Welcome to the forum.

Yes, welcome aboard.

Hitler's artwork was fantastic. Yet they always claim that his work was crap, while holding Picasso's scribbles out to be the best artwork ever produced.

Do you have any pics of the artwork you could post?

Hitler's artwork was fantastic. Yet they always claim that his work was crap, while holding Picasso's scribbles out to be the best artwork ever produced.

I always thought Picasso sucked. He's no Salvador Dali, that's for sure.

Do you have any pics of the artwork you could post?

http://www.hitler.org/art/

I always thought Picasso sucked. He's no Salvador Dali, that's for sure

yeh....i can't remember what 'school' Picasso haled from.
Dali was more or less a 'surrealist' but, what-ever you want to call him, he was a damn good painter

but, OTW, i have to agree: most of Picasso's stuff was pure crap!
(might make good wall-paper in a public toilet....that's abt it!)
wouldn't give you tuppence for it my-self let alone the $gazillions$ some of these deluded schmucks pay for it!

actually: now that i think of it, i don't reckon van Gogh was much of a painter either....i guess you'd call him 'a late impressionist' or sumthin' hunh? he gets a lot of hype but maybe that's because his some-what deranged life-style is held up to whites as some sort of 'artistic model'
so as to further corrupt innocent white children?....not that there's not plenty of other, more recent, 'hip-hop'-non-white life-styles to be held up so as to inflict more serious damage, of course!

my appreciation of 'modern art' basically stops @ the early-to-mid-era Impressionists......Monet, Cezanne, Renoir, Degas et al....now, some of their works are indeed impressive and, of course, they all mostly led healthy white life-styles...some-thing that ZOG never wants to make an example of!

lovely!

(jimbo!)

"A friend of mine has shown his copy [of Adolph Hitler, The Unknown Artist] to many casual acquaintances and reports that it was unexpectedly effective in making Americans aware of how much Yiddish excrement has been smeared over their faces for the past fifty years. At all events, you will learn from the volume that while the great champion of our race was not a truly great artist, he was, in art, as in his ultimate political purposes, an honest man, and we may hope that he will be remembered as such by the descendants of the nation that defeated him and destroyed itself..." (Revilo P. Oliver)

TWO AUSTRIANS
An "artist" and a "house painter"
http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/politics/twoartists.htm

A portrayal of a woman by Adolf Hitler:
Adolf Hitler, "Bathing in a Mountain Lake", 1933, Art in the Third Reich

This is how jew Nitsch portrays women:

Jew Hermann Nitsch, "Girl, together with a butchered pig under a cross", 1998

Adolf Hitler, "Mountain scene with wayside cross", 1923 - 1925 Hermann Nitsch, "Jesus under bleeding pig", 1998
Hitler's portrayal of Christian architecture This is how Nitsch portrays
Christianity

Adolf Hitler, "Karls-Church, Vienna", Aquarell, 1912 Hermann Nitsch, "Jesus, cruzified together with a butchered pig", 1998

Adolf Hitler, the "house painter"

Hermann Nitsch, the "artist"

Adolf Hitler is called the Austrian "house painter", not painter or artist. Hermann Nitsch on the other hand is praised as being one of the greatest Austrian artists ever lived. On August 10, 1998 he concluded one of his most successful open air exhibitions of "modern art", lasting for one week. Nitsch was cheered by the Austrian Chancellor, Ministers and other Government officials. All politically correct Parties in Austria were in praise of the "unique artwork" of Hermann Nitsch. This genius is sponsored with Millions of Euros by the Austrian government in order to secure the ongoing production of his works. The Austrian government and the media believe that Nitsch can uplift one's spirit by his "touching creations" - naked girls, resting in the bloody guts of butchered sows. On the other hand an individual will go to prison for up to 15 years in Austria if he possesses and shows or exhibits a piece of an Adolf Hitler painting.
This is an example of our democratic right of freedom of artistic expression and ideas. We are thankful that we can enjoy the outstanding works of Nitsch and are spared the horrors of Adolf Hitler's ugly scribbles. Thank God, democracy selects what we are allowed to see and what we are allowed to read and say.

Whose works do you want your children to see? Nitsch's "arts" or Hitlers "ugly scribbles"?

http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/politics/twoartists.htm

Most of what passes for art anymore is pure crap. It's almost like a game to see who can create the most disgusting and groteque images and still get praise for it.

most contemporary art amounts to visual puns of some sort. jokes and snide jewish humor in plastic, and because of this the "art" has no endurability when seen again. how many times is the same joke funny retold over and over? so most of it is just obvious crap. the art industry is a huge syndicate run by homosexuals and jews.

Old brutus proverb:

Modern art is nothing more then a jew telling you that a turd is a masterpiece.

"A friend of mine has shown his copy [of Adolph Hitler, The Unknown Artist] to many casual acquaintances and reports that it was unexpectedly effective in making Americans aware of how much Yiddish excrement has been smeared over their faces for the past fifty years. At all events, you will learn from the volume that while the great champion of our race was not a truly great artist, he was, in art, as in his ultimate political purposes, an honest man, and we may hope that he will be remembered as such by the descendants of the nation that defeated him and destroyed itself..." (Revilo P. Oliver)

TWO AUSTRIANS
An "artist" and a "house painter"
http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/politics/twoartists.htm

A portrayal of a woman by Adolf Hitler:
Adolf Hitler, "Bathing in a Mountain Lake", 1933, Art in the Third Reich

This is how jew Nitsch portrays women:

Jew Hermann Nitsch, "Girl, together with a butchered pig under a cross", 1998

Adolf Hitler, "Mountain scene with wayside cross", 1923 - 1925 Hermann Nitsch, "Jesus under bleeding pig", 1998
Hitler's portrayal of Christian architecture This is how Nitsch portrays
Christianity

Adolf Hitler, "Karls-Church, Vienna", Aquarell, 1912 Hermann Nitsch, "Jesus, cruzified together with a butchered pig", 1998

Adolf Hitler, the "house painter"

Hermann Nitsch, the "artist"

Adolf Hitler is called the Austrian "house painter", not painter or artist. Hermann Nitsch on the other hand is praised as being one of the greatest Austrian artists ever lived. On August 10, 1998 he concluded one of his most successful open air exhibitions of "modern art", lasting for one week. Nitsch was cheered by the Austrian Chancellor, Ministers and other Government officials. All politically correct Parties in Austria were in praise of the "unique artwork" of Hermann Nitsch. This genius is sponsored with Millions of Euros by the Austrian government in order to secure the ongoing production of his works. The Austrian government and the media believe that Nitsch can uplift one's spirit by his "touching creations" - naked girls, resting in the bloody guts of butchered sows. On the other hand an individual will go to prison for up to 15 years in Austria if he possesses and shows or exhibits a piece of an Adolf Hitler painting.
This is an example of our democratic right of freedom of artistic expression and ideas. We are thankful that we can enjoy the outstanding works of Nitsch and are spared the horrors of Adolf Hitler's ugly scribbles. Thank God, democracy selects what we are allowed to see and what we are allowed to read and say.

Whose works do you want your children to see? Nitsch's "arts" or Hitlers "ugly scribbles"?

http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/politics/twoartists.htm

Wow, thanks Ossian! I've been looking for that for some time. Best contrast of Aryan vs Jew on the net, in my opinion.

maybe this jew CUNT, Nitsch, should end up as part of one of his own
'creations' IF youse get my drift!

(jimbo!)