A black five foot-nine inch, one hundred-fifty pound animal defeated a human to win the "woman's" (Inter-Species) tennis final at Wimbledon.

This is the fourth Wimbledon title won by the nigger and makes her 13th Grand Slam victory. To win the Grand Slam, a player has to win the four Grand Slam tournaments called "the Majors" (Australian Open, French Open, American Open and Wimbledon).

Interestingly, this is the first time this nigger (Serena) has beat anyone other than her own sister (Venus) to win at Wimbledon. Together, the two animals have won nine of the last eleven Wimbledon titles.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i0099BjC_GidfbnjmjMFDXAq0FiwD9GNLRA80

...................................................................

That the two apes are gifted with agility, sprinting speed and power should come as no surprise.

Black athletes have monopolized every Olympic 100 metres for the past quarter of a century, [color="Red"]without a white man making the final. The same dominance asserts itself at the World Championships, in which every sprinter in eight of the past nine 100 meters finals has been black. The last white athlete to win the Olympic title - Allan Wells, of Britain - did so during a boycott that deprived the Moscow Olympics of the world's top black sprinters.

What conclusion should we draw from all this? That blacks have a genetic advantage over whites when it comes to sprinting? It would seem a natural inference except for a nagging voice giving [color="red"]warning about the consequences. If we were to acknowledge systematic genetic differences between the races, where would it lead us?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/olympics/article4500094.ece

(In other words . . . in this writer's view, we should deny obvious evidence whenever we fear the conclusions.)

................................................

There is a Natural Law dealing with inter-species competition called Gause's Law of Competitive Exclusion or the Competitive Exclusion Principle.

It simply states that no two species with similar ecological niches can coexist in a stable equilibrium, meaning that when two species compete for exactly the same requirements, one will be slightly more efficient than the other and will reproduce at a higher rate as a result. One of the two competitors will always overcome the other, leading to either the extinction of this competitor or an evolutionary or behavioral shift towards a different ecological niche.

H.G. Wells described this idea in The Time Machine where the underground-dwelling, troglodyte Morlock treat the above-ground Eloi as cattle.

One meaning for the disparaging Hebrew/Yiddish term "goyim" is "cattle" so with the Morlock-like Williams sister's dominance of tennis and the animal-like dominance of blacks in running and hitting events . . . while whites excel at intellectual and nation-building . . . looks like H.G. Wells wasn't far off.

Wells had no love for the jew (though there's no evidence he had them in mind when writing of the cattle-like Eloi).

As Wells said in the 1930s:

"Zionism is an expression of Jewish refusal to assimilate. If the Jews have suffered, it is because they have regarded themselves as a chosen people. A careful study of anti-Semitism prejudice and accusations might be of great value to many Jews, who do not adequately realize the irritations they inflict."