Is the IHR a dead horse or can it be revived under new leadership?

by: Carolyn

Dec. 14, 2013

A four-way discussion about the future of holocaust revisionism (today called “holocaust denial” by the holocaust industry) between Germar Rudolf , Friedrich Paul (Fritz) Berg , Dana Roccapriore and host Carolyn. Some of what was covered:

Mark Weber gained control of the Institute for Historical Review in the mid-nineties and shifted its entire purpose away from Holocaust Revisionism to no position on anything;

Weber was never a real revisionist (even in the 1980's), according to both Berg and Rudolf;

Weber resisted publishing books by Germar Rudolf, didn’t want to translate papers from German revisionists, and wanted to write his own summaries of articles submitted by others;

With David Irving, Weber was observed behaving like a total sycophant; he even appeared to be in love with Irving;

Many still think the IHR under Weber “looks good” and so financially support it;

Caller Jim brought up the H. Himmler “Posen speech,” which both Berg and Rudolf consider genuine but misunderstood;

Dana presented the view that most people are bored by “holocaust” in the media – he expects a backlash coming to which Germar agreed but more in Europe than in the U.S.

Image: The Journal of Historical Review was published from 1980 to 2002, when it finally fully succumbed to the negligence and disinterest of Mark Weber.

Podcast: Download

read full article at source: http://thewhitenetwork.com/2013/12/17/mark-weber-at-the-ihr-illegitimate-usurper-or-rightful-heir/