Israel Lobby’s 23-22 narrow victory on blaming the Turkish nation for the 1915 mass-killing of Armenian subjects of the Ottoman Empire – has brought great joy to the racist leaders of the Zionist entity but many in Obama administration fear that the resolution has angered Ankara and would make it almost impossible for Washington to get approval of the UN Security Council, next month, in order to put new “Crippling” sanctions against Islamic Iran under Israeli dictation.

In addition to the five permanent UNSC members with veto power (the US, France, Britain, Russia and China) – the current ten non-permanent members are; Turkey, Bosnia, Lebanon, Nigeria, Brazil, Mexico, Austria, Uganda, Gabon and Japan. The UNSC needs a 9-member majority without a veto to approve the sanctions against Tehran. China refuses to go along Washington’s Zionist agenda against Tehran, so is Brazil, Turkey, Bosnia and Lebanon. However, lately, Moscow under economic and political pressure, seems to be willing to come abroad Israeli boat.

The ZOG of Barack Obama had sent high-level American officials to China, Russia, Brazil, Lebanon and Turkey – to convince the government leaders of those countries to side with Obama’s masters in Tel Aviv. The greatest humiliation these American officials got was US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, in Brazil. President Lula da Silva, told reporters ahead of his meeting with Hillary Clinton: “It’s not prudent to push Iran against a wall”. After the meeting, Brazil’s foreign minister Celso Amorim said that new sanctions could be ‘counter-productive’.” The government leaders in Beirut and Ankara have made similar comments in recent weeks. Brazilian government see many similarities between Brazil’s own civilian nuclear program which was sanctioned by Washington in the 1970s that forced Brasilia to set-up secret nuclear activities which eventually succeeded in developing enrichment capacity. Like the current unproven Iran-bashing, Brazil too faced similar slur from Jewish Lobby in those days. As one Brazilian official in Brasilia recently said: “When Brazil looks at Iran it doesn’t see only Iran, it sees Brazil too”.

Venzuela’s president Hugo Chavez commented on Hillary Clinton’s visit to Brazil by saying: “She is Condoleeaza Rice…. a blond Condoleeza. She comes to Brazil to provoke us, to try and divide us from our brothers”.

On Wednesday, in a conference in Vienna, the represntatives of the 100-nation-strong Non-aligned Movement (NAM) repeated their earlier support of Iran’s civilian nuclear program. Egyptian representative to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Mohamed Mustafa Fawzy read out a very strongly worded statement criticizing IAEA secretary general for preparing anti-Iran report against the agency’s norms. He stressed that the nature of Iranian nuclear program is peaceful and Iran’s status at IAEA should turn back to normal.

On Saturday, in an interview with IRNA, the former German law-maker from German Opposition (Linke), Norman Paech, criticized IAEA report by saying: “The majority of States do believe that Iran should have the chance to have a civilian nuclear enrichment program (like South Africa and Brazil). …. It (IAEA report) did not include any new information about Iran’s nuclear program. We are dealing with new interpretation of old finding which have been somehow dramatized now…. The report was geared at boosting the western sanction threat. IAEA secretary general Yukiya Amano could no longer be viewed as a neutral mediator in the Iranian nuclear dispute as he was following the interests of the US and its allies…. Iranian nation must continue its nuclear program within the framework of NPT despite western sanction pressure…”

http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/03/07/israeli-dilemma-on-%e2%80%9ccrippling%e2%80%9d-sanctions-against-iran/