The interesting part of this bullshit is to take "art" say the Lord of the Rings, and twist it to promote your politics. This is what the Jews do everyday, example: Leonardo's art in the DaVinci Code [Jewish publisher].

From the bottom of the page of the first link:

[His first book was about the] ...arrival in Nova Scotia of these refugees from the Orkney Isles under the leadership of nobleman Henry Sinclair, Earl of Orkney and Baron of Rosslyn (AD 1345-1400). According to a document known as "The Zeno Narrative", Sinclair’s refugees established a "city" in Nova Scotia in AD 1398 – almost a century before Christopher Columbus (1492) and John Cabot (1497) supposedly first crossed the Atlantic.

Holy Grail Across the Atlantic enjoyed considerable popular success in Canada, selling almost 20,000 copies in several printings although it was generally ridiculed by Canada’s established historians. The book inspired several "clones", including Andrew Sinclair’s The Sword and the Grail (1992), Mark Finnan’s The Sinclair Saga (1999) and American author Steven Sora’s The Lost Treasure of the Knights Templar (1999).

In 1995, however, the Royal Nova Scotia Museum recovered sixty-three metal fragments of European origin in three Mi'kmaq ("Micmac") Indian sites (Pictou, Avonport and Northport, all in Nova Scotia). The fragments were pieces of "from six to thirteen metal pots" (two of which were virtually complete), according to analysis of the fragments' metallic impurities by the University of Toronto’s SLOWPOKE nuclear reactor. Since these metal fragments all dated from about AD 1400 to AD 1450 according to accepted Mi'kmaq stratigraphy, Bradley’s assertions in Holy Grail Across the Atlantic have gained considerable scientific support.

The second book of the trilogy published ten years later, Grail Knights of North America (The Dundurn Group, Toronto, 1998) presented the evidence of twenty artefacts indicating that the original Nova Scotia "Grail Refugees" and their descendants had probed inland toward the Great Lakes Basin along at least five major river routes. Bradley speculated in this book that they were seeking convenient sources of metal with which to sustain their medieval European lifestyle.

Because of several artefacts discovered in Potton Township on the shores of Lake Memphremagog, about one hundred kilometres south of Montreal, Bradley concluded that the original Nova Scotia Grail Refugees had established an inland concentration of their population along the shores of this lake. Long and narrow Lake Memphremagog is near the source of four of the five river routes where Grail-era artefacts have been discovered.

One of the artifacts is a twenty-metre-long stone dam that was radiocarbon dated by professional Quebec archaeologists to about AD 1450. The dating, done at U.of T.'s Isotech Labs, was performed on hemlock wood surveyor's stakes that had been recovered during provincially-sponsored excavations. These stakes had defined the slight upstream curve of the dam's configuration. But only an established and relatively populous community needs a dam for a mill.

This settlement, mainly on the western shore of Lake Memphremagog, was actually founded, Bradley believes, by about AD 1425-1450 in the foothills of the Green Mountains on the border of Quebec and Vermont.

Although the Quebec government became interested in the Memphremagog sites as early as 1997-1998 when an Arts and Entertainment Network documentary was produced at the dam by Greystone Productions of Los Angeles, the only English-language Canadian coverage of the artefacts has been a few short newspaper articles that Bradley was able to sell to English Canadian media.

Since the publication of Grail Knights of North America in 1998, at least three other apparently European pre-colonial artefacts have been independently discovered on the western shores of Lake Memphremagog.

In the third and final book of the trilogy, Swords at Sunset, Michael Bradley claims to have located yet another Grail Refugee settlement on the Niagara Escarpment. "Obviously," says Bradley, "the reason for this settlement was to allow navigation ‘above the (Niagara) Falls’ by using the Upper Great Lakes to reach toward the interior of the North American continent."

But the settlement in the Green Mountains near Lake Memphremagog and the one on the Niagara Escarpment were both wiped out about AD 1571 due to conflict with the rising power of the Iroquois Confederacy. Bradley’s source for this date is an admittedly speculative interpretation of the Book of Mormon. But Bradley is quick to point out that the dates of artefacts actually discovered on the Niagara Escarpment do roughly match his interpretation of dates given in the Book of Mormon. "Either the founding Prophet of Mormonism, Joseph Smith, actually discovered some sort of record and was able to read the gist of it – or else we’re faced with some astounding coincidences," Bradley maintains.

The well-known Canadian author, John Robert Colombo, has agreed to write a Foreword for Swords at Sunset, just as he wrote an "Appreciative Foreword" for Holy Grail Across the Atlantic to introduce Bradley's trilogy sixteen years ago.

If that was all that Michael Bradley had to say in Swords at Sunset, it would still be a "controversial" book for Canadian history buffs, perhaps, but it would not be so potentially offensive to major religious groups – or so potentially relevant to understanding history's pattern of Western expansion and today’s Middle East conflicts.

But Bradley, in the final chapter of this last book of the trilogy, undertakes to explain what the "Holy Grail" really was.

And this explanation purports to make the religious history of the Western world from the Atlantic to western India explicable. This highly controversial and outspoken final Chapter 7 can be viewed on Michael Bradley's web site at http://www.geocities.com/michaelbradley2003. It is necessary to scroll about two-thirds of the way down the Home Page to find the Swords at Sunset link.

Chapter 7 of Swords at Sunset would turn our traditional religious ideas and loyalties upside down.

Bradley argues that the so-called "Holy Grail" was the original symbol of the Cro-Magnon people of Western Europe who travelled, mainly via the Mediterranean, its major rivers and lowlands, all the way to western India.

The Holy Grail was symbolic of the all-regenerating womb of the Great Fertility Goddess who was continually fertilized by her husband-son, the Good Shepherd. Bradley cites the work of French anthropologists Marcel Griaule and Germaine Dieterlen, as well as the research of UCLA Professor Emeritus of Archaeology Dr. Marija Gimbutas, in support of this idea.

According to Bradley, the Great Goddess gradually evolved into "Mary" (both the Virgin and the Magdalene) of the New Testament and Her Good Shepherd husband-son consort gradually became the figure we know as Jesus. That is, according to Michael Bradley, the earliest Christianity was polytheistic, having revered representatives of both genders, and the legend of the Holy Grail was a medieval remembrance of this former religious orientation.

Therefore, Bradley argues, the religion of the "Holy Grail" was, and is, nothing more than a reflection of the earliest form of Christianity or "Messiah reverence".

Another extremely controversial 2004 book, Tom Harpur's The Pagan Christ, argues much the same idea and presents some of the same archaeological evidence.

And what about monotheism?

In his startlingly outspoken Chapter 7 of Swords at Sunset, Bradley re-introduces the geographical and anthropological arguments of his first major book to gain international recognition, The Iceman Inheritance: Prehistoric Sources of Western Man’s Racism, Sexism and Aggression (Dorset Publishing Inc., Toronto, 1978).

"It is interesting," notes Bradley, "that Sigmund Freud wrote on page 18 of his Moses and Monotheism (1939) ‘religious intolerance came into the world with the introduction of monotheism.’" And where was this monotheism introduced from?

"It is fairly easy to correlate, on maps anyway, the distribution of monotheistic conceptions with the Caucasus Mountains and the contiguous mountain ranges radiating from them," says Bradley.

"In fact, with respect to contemporary Islamic fundamentalism, it is still easy to pinpoint the Chechnya fanatics in the Caucasus Mountains themselves, the Ayatollah Koumeni in the Zagros Mountains of Iran, Saddam Hussein in the Zagros-Elburz range which enters central Iraq, the Taliban in the Hindu Kush of Afghanistan and Pakistani extremists in the Pamirs and high Kashmir."

"It is also easy to correlate this montane habitat with a ‘strain’ or ‘race’ of people called Neanderthals. Tendencies toward monotheism apparently developed among this group of humanity alone, whereas as all other human groups exhibited a clear tendency toward polytheism."

"As every newspaper reader knows by now, there has been a concerted North American media campaign since July 1997 to try to convince everyone that Neanderthals did not interbreed with so-called ‘modern humans’", Bradley noted. "This is because one influential ethnic-religious group still retains marked Neanderthal characteristics from their Caucasus-steppe origins."

"However, when CBC Radio’s "Quirks and Quarks" revisited this issue on March 27, 2004, its panel of international experts was forced to admit what the actual facts have indicated all along since at least 1968. Neanderthals did, indeed, interbreed with ‘modern humans’ and it also happened not so long ago."

"The conflict between the psychosexually balanced Cro-Magnons of the Atlantic coast and Mediterranean lowlands on the one hand, and the psychosexually unbalanced and aggressive Neanderthals of the Caucasus-steppes on the other hand, has formed the basic pattern of Western history: successive ‘barbarian’ invasions from the Caucasus-steppes. In terms of religion, we see this most clearly as the gradual imposition of monotheism – with greater or lesser success – on formerly polytheistic and relatively peaceful people.

"Christianity, for example, has retained a high degree of polytheism in its tripartite God, its many saints and in some places it is just thinly disguised Mary-worship. In these characteristics, much of even orthodox Christianity harks back some 10,000 years to reverence for the Great Goddess. True Christianity really has very little to do with Judaism and, in fact, is much older than Judaism."

"From an anthropological point of view, it is clear that monotheism has much less to do with the supposed nature of God and 'His' alleged injunctions than it has to do with the genetic and mental proclivities of a certain group of people."

And what about the Jews, the first known monotheistic people?

"Well, most scholars concur that the biblical Jews originated in the southern Caucasus Mountains and were driven out of the Black Sea Basin by the great flood-out of 5600 BC. Oceanographers Walter Pitman and William Ryan of Columbia University documented the date and the huge extent of this flood only in 1996 in their book, In Search of Noah’s Flood.

The biblical Hebrews were a contingent of the peoples that history knows as Hittites, Mittani, Hurrians, Hyksos and Hi-bi-ru ('Hebrews', in Egyptian). Migrating away from the great Black Sea Flood, they over-ran the entire Middle East, with their military innovations of chariots and composite bows, between about 2500 BC and 1500 BC. The Hyksos and associated Hebrews even invaded northwestern Egypt about 1700 BC."

"They were expelled from Egypt about 1550-1350 BC by several rulers of the Eighteenth Dynasty, the last phase of which seems to have been the biblical Exodus."

"As for the vast majority of Jews today, those people with Germanic or Slavic names called 'Ashkenazim' from Central and Eastern Europe, they are not related to biblical Israelites at all, either genetically or historically."

"Their Caucasus-steppe ancestors, called Khazars, were converted to Judaism in AD 740. The Khazars, as several prominent Jewish historians have confirmed, were just a later name for the terrible Huns, once called 'the Scourge of God', who had invaded Europe between AD 449 and AD 453."

"These 'Ashkenazim' also presently form the vast majority of Israel’s population. Perhaps that alone explains a great deal about the Palestinian conflict and other violent Middle Eastern confrontations."

"If we refuse to understand the real genetic factors behind the chronic Middle East conflict in particular and "Western" aggression in general, I truly fear that it will soon be sunset for this expression of human civilization," Bradley said...

"The Jews" move their true homeland about as it pleases them. Khazaria in Europe, Saudi Arabia in the Near East. They know the Khazar claim is bunk, but apparently hope to be "given" a Jewish state in Europe, eventually, and they keep Khazaria going for that reason. I don't know why they would want Saudi Arabia (heh-heh), but from this it seems they do! Some how " The Jews" always deserve to get more from the nons, funny it works out that way...

"On October 10, 2000, my full-page article "In Search of the Lost Monarch" was published in the Vancouver Sun's Insight section. This piece was about the Queen of Sheba and its immediately topical news peg was the upcoming expedition of the University of Calgary to the Queen's traditional capital of Ma'rib, now in modern Yemen.

In this article, I pointed out that Ethiopian traditions of the Queen of Sheba were fairly definitive. For example, her name was remembered as Makeba. It was, on the contrary, the Israelite kings David and Solomon whose existence seemed to be more problematical. I also pointed out, relying on various categories of evidence, that the Israelite "Promised Land" could not have been in Palestine, but was somewhere on the Red Sea coast of Western Arabia. In this, I followed Kamal Salibi's linguistic research (more recently verified by Chaim Rabin). I suggested certain avenues of further research in this article.
This article got me blacklisted in most of the major daily English Canadian newspapers, almost all of which are owned by the Jewish Asper family of Winnipeg-based Global CanWest. This article also resulted in the demotion of the Vancouver Sun's Insight Editor, Chris Rose.

Dr. Bernard Leeman was apparently already working along these lines, although my article may have encouraged him that this highly controversial line of research was worth pursuing. In any event, Dr. Leeman wrote to me in June 2005 announcing the upcoming publication of his book Queen of Sheba and Biblical Scholarship scheduled for July 2005 release by the Queensland Academic Press of Australia. He kindly mentioned me in his Acknowledgements (page 5). On September 5th, Dr. Leeman also gave me permission to reprint a two-page promo of his book as Appendix I of Swords at Sunset. I am trying to convince my new publisher, Manor House Publishing Inc., to include an Appendix I although it is a little late in the game since the book may already be at the printers'. This link will take you to this synopsis of Dr. Leeman's new book and a map that's worth many thousands of words.

Basically, this work vindicates the historical reconstruction of the real "Exodus destination" offered in Chapter 3 of Swords at Sunset. It was mostly this Chapter that "offended" Dundurn's Anna Synenko and inspired her to cause the owners of Dundurn to repudiate Swords at Sunset and cancel its scheduled publication in May 2004. However, Anna Synenko could not have been thrilled with the Epilogue either.
However, any real offence is all mine.

The Old Testament did not make an innocent mistake in placing the "Promised Land" in Palestine. Nor were the Zionists following naive religious loyalty to the Old Testament when they began to agitate for the creation of the modern State of Israel. The Zionist movement began about 1850 to 1870 and its notable personality was Theodore Herzl who succeeded in organizing the first Zionist Conference in 1896.

But some Jewish scholars somewhere among the Zionists knew very well that the real "traditional Jewish homeland" was in Western Arabia and not in Palestine. The major problem for the Zionists was, however, that Western Arabia was firmly under the control of the Saudi Royalty, was an ally of Britain which had fought with the legendary "Lawrence of Arabia" against the Turks and which was definitely not available for settlement and takeover.

Nonetheless, someone among leading Zionists knew where the truly historical Jewish homeland had been. The great danger of the Zionist deception was simply that an earlier version of the Old Testament (at least the Pentateuch, Kings I and II and perhaps Psalms) could be discovered at any time beneath the sands of Western Arabia. Two prominent Jewish orientalists, the Austrian Edouard Glaser and the Frenchman Joseph Halévy, were therefore dispatched to Western Arabia in order to steal or "confiscate" as many inscriptions as they could carry back to Europe. Thankfully for the Zionists of the time nothing "bombshell biblical" was discovered among the 1500-odd stolen inscriptions that Glaser and Halévy were able to recover...."