read this!
http://www.forward.com/articles/7430
News
LETTER FROM HERNDON, VA.
White Nationalist Conference Ponders Whether Jews and Nazis Can Get Along
By JONATHAN TILOVE
March 3, 2006For the small, hardy band of right-wing Jews who attended this past weekend's American Renaissance Conference, the biennial gathering of white nationalists ended on a sour note.
The events Saturday, February 25, passed without major incident. But then, late Sunday morning, none other than former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke approached the microphone on the floor during the question-and-answer session for French writer Guillaume Faye. After congratulating Faye for stirring remarks that "touched my genes," Duke asked if there weren't an even more insidious threat to the West than Islam.
"There is a power in the world that dominates our media, influences our government and that has led to the internal destruction of our will and our spirit," Duke said.
"Tell us, tell us," came a call from the back of the room.
"I'm not going to say it," Duke said to rising laughter.
But Michael Hart, a squat, balding Jewish astrophysicist from Maryland, was not amused. He rose from his seat, strode toward Duke (who loomed over him like an Aryan giant), spit out a curse — "You f...ing Nazi, you've disgraced this meeting" — and exited.
As it happens, only a few minutes earlier Hart, a mainstay of American Renaissance conferences, had been trying to reassure Herschel Elias, a first-time attendee from suburban Philadelphia, that he should not let his observation that the meeting was "infiltrated by Nazis and Holocaust deniers" ruin his impression of American Renaissance.
"The speakers aren't Nazis," Hart assured him. "Jared isn't a Nazi."
Jared is Jared Taylor, editor of American Renaissance magazine. He founded the publication 1990, and since 1994 he had sponsored the biennial conference that bears its name. A former liberal, Taylor is glib, gracious and genial, capable of putting his white nationalism in the most benign and commonsense terms.
"We mean well to all people," he said in his address at this year's conference, "but our own people come first."
The conference has attracted ever larger crowds, with this year's event drawing about 300 people — all white (no more than 5% Jewish) and most of them male. The attendees are united by a common belief in black intellectual inferiority, opposition to non-white immigration and ardor for maintaining America's white majority. By the end of this seventh biennial conference, however, the delicate state of his coalition seemed apparent.
Hart, who spoke at the 1996 conference about his plan for a racial partition of the United States, said that Taylor now had to face the fact that he must purge the Nazis or lose the Jews. "He can't expect Jews to come if there are Nazis here,'' Hart said.
And therein lies Taylor's dilemma.
From the start, he has been trying to de-Nazify the movement and draw the white nationalist circle wider to include Jews of European descent. But to many on the far right, taking the Jew-hatred out of white nationalism is like taking the Christ out of Christmas — a sacrilege. Actually inviting Jews into the movement is an act of lunacy, or betrayal, to them.
Still, just before dinner Saturday, Taylor sounded resolute.
"Ultimately, for all the things I care about to happen, Jews must be part of the movement," he said in an interview. The reason, he added, is that Jews have influence and are widely seen as "the conscience of our society."
For example, Taylor said, without Jewish support it will be nearly impossible to restrict immigration. Besides, the conference organizer said, as far as he is concerned, a white Jew is white.
In its dossier on Taylor, the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Review speculates that his conspicuous lack of antisemitism "may be related to his wife, who some in the movement have said is Jewish." The Atlanta-based organization, which monitors hate groups, has described Taylor as "the race hater."
"What kind of 'intelligence' is that?" Taylor asked. He said that his wife, Evelyn Rich, is not Jewish.
According to the Intelligence Review: "Evelyn Rich became well known because of her 1985 and 1986 interviews of Duke, conducted as part of her dissertation research... [which] were used by anti-Duke forces to make radio ads attacking Duke during his run for Louisiana governor in 1991." This may help explain the wary relationship between Duke and Taylor, opposites in many ways.
In May 2003, American Renaissance published a piece by Michael Berman about his racial awakening, headlined "I Was a Red-diaper Baby."
Son of a card-carrying Communist, Berman marched on Washington with Martin Luther King Jr. But, he wrote, that was before two of his sisters were raped by black men and before he served eight years as the dean of boys at Brooklyn's George W. Wingate High School, where "we averaged five arrests a day." These days he attends American Renaissance conferences, and this year he brought a likeminded former teaching colleague to serve as his shabbos goy.
"It has not been easy for me as a New York Jew, embracing the views that I do. I am regarded as a pariah," Berman wrote in his 2003 essay.
Four of the 10 speakers were Jewish at the first conference in 1994 in Atlanta, including New York writer Lawrence Auster and City College philosophy professor Michael Levin. The after-dinner speaker that year was Rabbi Mayer Schiller, a teacher at Yeshiva University High School for Boys who believes in racial separatism. Schiller brought a cadre of yeshiva students with him. Kosher dinners were provided.
At the 2000 conference in Herndon, Robert Weissberg — a political scientist who then worked at the University of Illinois — delivered a speech titled "Jews and Blacks: Everything the Goyim Want To Know but Were Afraid To Ask." His thesis was that although Jews and blacks loathe one another, Jews remain frightened of the white right.
Weissberg delivered his remarks with his trademark blend of erudition, Yiddishisms and Borscht Belt timing. He was not a big hit. Taylor heard the complaints: "Now the Jews want to take over this, too."
Weissberg, who is living in New York once again, keeps coming to the conferences. He enjoys the open talk about race, perhaps also the whiff of intellectual danger. At the Saturday morning session, the man sitting next to him doodled on his pad: "No good Jew."
Despite such sentiments, Taylor is not the only one looking to include Jews.
Gordon Baum, the amiable, chain-smoking CEO of the Council of Conservative Citizens, said that his organization has good Jewish members, including a member of the board from St. Louis. "We're in Mensa together," Baum said. He also said that obsessing over Jews "sidetracks you from the real issue."
But Louis Calabro, a retired San Francisco police officer who heads the European/American Issues Forum in the Bay Area, said his sense is that most of those at the conference consider Jews a problem. He revealed that, in his own experience, any time he does anything to rally white European American pride, those who object are almost invariably Jews.
There is also the question of whether any subordination of antisemitism is merely strategic.
Nick Griffin has been credited with trying to root out antisemitism from the British National Party, which he leads. But in answer to a question at the recent conference, he said: "The proper enemy to any political movement isn't necessarily the most evil and the worst. The proper enemy is the one we can most easily defeat.''
Faye, the French writer, offered a similar response to Duke's not-so-veiled reference to Jews.
"The danger of the Jews is not the same as danger of the Arabs,'' he said. He continued: "The Jew is" — and here he had to have Taylor interpret a French expression — "the hole in the dike."
"The water is immigration," he continued. "We must fight on two fronts, but not by the same means. We must be very acute in our strategy. The best thing is to not speak about the Jews. They don't exist. For me, they are like Eskimos."
Not everyone at last weekend's meeting could stay cool on the Jewish question. Before Faye spoke, Michael Matthews, an attendee from New Jersey, passed Michael Berman in the hotel foyer.
"Are you a Jew?" Matthews demanded. "I don't think you should be here."
Berman was hurt.
"You see, there's no home for me,'' he sighed after Matthews had left. "I'm like a black sheep here and everywhere I go."
Interesting stuff.
When it comes to the Jewish question, Jared Taylor reminds me the proverbial monkey with his hands over his eyes. He goes to controversial lengths to be Jew-friendly and then undermines himself by inviting Duke to speak. Duke is not ambiguous on the Jew question and the result was entirely predictable. He needs to go one way or the other. If he wants Jews on his side then it would help to abandon Jew-crits, and vice versa.
read this!
[color="Gray"]
He goes to controversial lengths to be Jew-friendly and then undermines himself by inviting Duke to speak.
But he didn't invite Duke to speak. Duke bought a ticket and stood up in the audience to ask a question. Those who spoke tip-toed around jews, as if to say we will save the most important question for last.
He needs to go one way or the other. If he wants Jews on his side then it would help to abandon Jew-crits, and vice versa.
This sums it up perfectly. You can see by the excerpt from the ADL I've posted below that his "hands off" policy on the Jews does not help him. Organized Jewry will continue to criticize him regardless of his attitude towards the Jews. Thus it is obvious that he would have to abandon racial nationalism altogether and become a neo-con in order to satisfy Organized Jewry.
From the ADL
New Century Foundation (American Renaissance)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Founder: Samuel Jared Taylor
Founded: November 1990
Headquarters: Oakton, Virginia
Publication: American Renaissance
Ideology: Intellectualized, pseudoscientific white supremacy]At some point, Jared Taylor must name the Jew, even if he limits it to Organized Jewry at the outset.
Alaska Pride Blog
White Reference Blog
Oops I misread - I assumed the microphone was on the stage.
Any indication of how many of the 300 attending were Jew-critical?
But he didn't invite Duke to speak. Duke bought a ticket and stood up in the audience to ask a question. Those who spoke tip-toed around jews, as if to say we will save the most important question for last.
[color="Gray"]
"Four of the 10 speakers were Jewish at the first conference in 1994 in Atlanta, including New York writer Lawrence Auster and City College philosophy professor Michael Levin. The after-dinner speaker that year was Rabbi Mayer Schiller, a teacher at Yeshiva University High School for Boys who believes in racial separatism. Schiller brought a cadre of yeshiva students with him. Kosher dinners were provided." AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
What do you want to bet that wife IS a jew, but yet not a jew at the same time? And isn't Jared the one with the two jewish son-in-laws? Maybe I have him mixed up with someone else?
I think it is safe to assume that anything that is well-funded and able to get off the ground has jews funding it/participating in it so they can control it for their own Zionist gangster benefit.
Jews are supposedly 2 or 3 per cent of the population, but nothing can be done without their $upport. No one asks why this is.
"Go, Nazis, Go!"
I just listened to an interview conducted by James Edwards on his "Political Cesspool" with Jamie Kelso, who was at a dinner gathering with many of the speakers and attendees at the AmRen conference. Kelso was the main interviewee, intermittently passing his cell phone around to others such as Don Black, Bob Whitaker, and Nick Griffin. Seems to be a mixed bag there. I have a bit of trouble keeping track of who believes exactly what in the movement sometimes. How can Nick Griffin believe he's going to purge his BNP of "antisemites" while having a grand ol' time in America with Kelso, Black, and Whitaker, who are closely allied with Duke and Strom? I think it will be difficult for Taylor to sort out these pretty obvious conflicts of interest, but he'd better do something about it soon if the Jews who are sympathetic to white nationalism are getting pissed off.
Kelso, Griffin, et al seemed quite enthusiastic about the turnout.
"In 1958 I still believed that there was a significant intellectual difference between the American bourgeoisie and the cattle that one sees peering between the slats of large trucks as they contentedly munch hay on their way to the abattoir."
Revilo P. Oliver
I'll give Duke credit for naming the jew. He does do that.
Oh, and fuck JT and his org and the CofCC while I'm at it. 
At some point, Jared Taylor must name the Jew, even if he limits it to Organized Jewry at the outset.
If you read enough of his AmRens you will find that he has in the past, a wee little bit, pointed out some things organized Jewry has done. I was surprised when I read it. It certainly isn't in the outright manner one would find on VNN, though. That probably won't ever happen.
"In 1958 I still believed that there was a significant intellectual difference between the American bourgeoisie and the cattle that one sees peering between the slats of large trucks as they contentedly munch hay on their way to the abattoir."
Revilo P. Oliver
Clearly he will never be well-liked by organized jewry, no matter what he does today or tomorrow. There are few if any benefits in Jew-friendliness. Perhaps some Jews will give him some money. More importantly perhaps it will make him look more reasonable among some Jew-sensitized Whites. I think we've all met Whites who don't get the Jew thing.
Perhaps in the future, if America enters a period of more overt racial strife, a group like AmRen could divide the Jews who may quarrel amongst themselves on whom to ally with. Dividing Jews is not an unthinkable or impossible proposition, and some resources might wisely be allocated to this worthy task.
I am just giving some benefit of the doubt here. I don't think Taylor is a fraud like some do on VNN, but I agree that his strategy is questionable.
This sums it up perfectly. You can see by the excerpt from the ADL I've posted below that his "hands off" policy on the Jews does not help him. Organized Jewry will continue to criticize him regardless of his attitude towards the Jews. Thus it is obvious that he would have to abandon racial nationalism altogether and become a neo-con in order to satisfy Organized Jewry.
At some point, Jared Taylor must name the Jew, even if he limits it to Organized Jewry at the outset.
[color="Gray"]
If you read enough of his AmRens you will find that he has in the past, a wee little bit, pointed out some things organized Jewry has done. I was surprised when I read it. It certainly isn't in the outright manner one would find on VNN, though. That probably won't ever happen.
I once subscribed to American Renaissance. It is an extremely scholarly and erudite publication, some of it actually a bit over my head. I agree that Jared Taylor will never become like Alex Linder. But if he ever became more like David Duke, I think that would help him.
I think we've all met Whites who don't get the Jew thing.
I don't think I have discussed this stuff with more than 4 people in person who do get it. It's very rare! That is why I think Taylor is valuable, as disagreeable as his methods seem to VNNers and others who realize what Jews, collectively, have done and continue to do.
"In 1958 I still believed that there was a significant intellectual difference between the American bourgeoisie and the cattle that one sees peering between the slats of large trucks as they contentedly munch hay on their way to the abattoir."
Revilo P. Oliver
Still, just before dinner Saturday, Taylor sounded resolute.
"Ultimately, for all the things I care about to happen, Jews must be part of the movement," he said in an interview. The reason, he added, is that Jews have influence and are widely seen as "the conscience of our society."
This has earned him a noose.
The ink of the learned is as precious as the blood of the martyr. For one drop of ink may make millions think.
When AR was first founded Jared Taylor thought that if he included the Jews into his group he could 'mainstream' his organization and ideas to middle America. However this is what he doesn't understand - The Jews won't let him do it. The fact his second edition of the "Color of Crime" book was snubbed by the Jewish media should tell Mr.Taylor that the Jews are NO friends of our Aryan Renaissance.
Leave it to Brutus, to get to the meat of the matter.
Davidduke.com provides links to Taylor's website. From that, and other indications I've seen, Duke does not consider Taylor deliberately subversive to WN.
And I trust David Duke more than any WN leader alive.
In my present judgment, I believe Taylor is simply taking the safer, easier approach. "Play it safe. Don't get involved too deeply. Go with the smart money," etc.
Duke will never sell out or compromise on the jews. Trust him and his judgments.
And oh yes, the jews are trying to take over the White Racialist Movement. And for the sole purpose of turning it against the Arab/Muslim enemies of Israel and the ZOGs. David Horowitz is a prime example. And Jared Taylor bears close watching.
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire