Disagreeing with someone is not defamation. This is abject nonsense, it is a judge “legislating from the bench,” taking away from basic First Amendment freedoms through an absurd ruling.

Yes, a jury decided, but it was the duty of the judge to dismiss this gibberish as an obvious attack on constitutionally-protected speech rights.

This is actually, somehow, even more extreme than the Alex Jones “defamation” cases. These courts are going through, step-by-step, and creating entire categories of political speech that are no longer allowed.

read

https://dailystormer.in/jury-awards-climate-scientist-more-than-1-million-because-people-criticized-his-work/