Source URL: http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_joel_s___060928_kinky_friedman_can_d.htm
[color="Red"]Kinky Friedman Can Devastate Bush
by Joel S. Hirschhorn ([color="Red"]I'm not 100% certain that this "columnist" is a jew, but he sure looks the part and tows the appropriate line.)
Many neo-progressives think that voting for Democrats this year equates to voting against Bush. So much hatred of Bush and his administration has, unfortunately, created too much support for Democrats. There is a much better way to punish Bush and also send a much needed message to the Democratic and Republican establishments. If you are a Texan, vote for Kinky Friedman for governor. If you live elsewhere, contribute to Kinky's campaign and get Texans you know to get out and vote for Kinky.
Make no mistake. What our current plutocracy and economic aristocracy need is a real jolt, a needle in the eyes of all the arrogant and corrupt elites running and ruining our country. As an irreverent political outsider, Kinky is the man for this patriotic task. For him to become governor of Texas, where Bush resides and votes, and following in Bush's political footsteps, offers a unique opportunity to stick it to Bush. Just imagine the joy of Kinky beating the no-brain Republican incumbent. Better yet, imagine how Bush would have to react politely in public and go nuts privately.
A Kinky victory would be a celebration of DEMOCRACY IN TEXAS!
How could Bush say anything negative about his FELLOW TEXANS freely choosing singer, songwriter, novelist and status quo basher Kinky? Could Bush and other Republican elites blame Texans for exercising democratic right?
Imagine how people around the world would also enjoy a Kinky victory – a vivid demonstration of democracy working in America. Foreigners would clearly see a Kinky victory as a rejection of Bush.
All the arrogant, elitist politicians in America would be knocked over by a Kinky tsunami. The implications for the 2008 presidential election would be enormous. It could energize the majority of eligible voters in the nation that do not vote and independents, third-party loyalists, and enormous numbers of fed up Democrats and Republicans. Governor Kinky Friedman would instantly energize the disrespected and largely ignored third-party movement.
Americans are ready to embrace true outsiders who are not professional politicians, not beholding to the Democratic or Republican parties, and not in the pocket of special interests.
With all his quirks Kinky has established himself as a truth-teller. He personifies a status quo buster, someone able and willing to creatively address problems on behalf of we the people.
Columnist Liz Smith wrote this the other day: "Now you may not care who becomes the governor of Texas but as this great state has sent three men to the White House, maybe you should. And if you were an Ann Richards fan, you could memorialize her by endorsing her own candidate -- Kinky. And if you are a real Democrat, a populist or a liberal-thinking person, I'd say Kinky is your man. I hope he wins."Texas columnist John Kelso observed: "Isn't it refreshing to have a candidate who's actually smart enough to be a smartass? It's been a long time coming."
Nervous Democrats and Republicans have lately attacked Kinky for being a racist. This is sheer nonsense. African-American columnist Bob Ray Sanders said this: "Come on, y'all. There may be plenty of reasons not to vote for Kinky Friedman, but him being a racist is not one of them, namely because he is not. He may be -- he is --a lot of things, but not a bigot. I know satire can be hard to comprehend and, even if one understands it, hard to swallow. But that's what the man does." ([color="Red"]As the article states, "Bob Ray Sanders" is a typing monkey whose "articles" appear in the Ft. Worth Star Telegram. Normally he'd go after anyone making "racist" comments, but he knows not to step on the kosher toes of the jews like Kinky who butter his toast) Texas writer Dolph Tillotson also addressed this issue and said: "Interestingly, the Republican frontrunner tended to ignore Friedman until the challenger's poll numbers took an upward turn. Now the masters of spin are scouring Friedman's writings and tapes of his performances. Kinky being Kinky, it's not hard to find offensive remarks. Still, based on what I've seen so far, I haven't changed my mind. I still find Friedman more appealing than the empty suits he's running against. I don't think he's a racist ([color="Red"]But of course; only us white gentiles can be "racists."). Here's where I think the truth lies. Calling Kinky Friedman "insensitive" is a little like calling former Gov. Ann Richards, God rest her, a Democrat. ... What he offers voters ... is the rare opportunity to say emphatically how disenchanted we are with traditional, empty, lobby-dominated politics in Texas."
And by the way, Kinky favors legalizing marijuana, mainly to make room in prisons for more dangerous criminals.
So don't hesitate. Don't just be mad, get even with Bush. Help get Kinky elected. By all accounts [color="Red"]he will win if the voter turnout is significantly better than the 29 percent in the last gubernatorial election. His opponents have enormously more money. But Kinky has the guts, humor and honesty to redefine not only Texas politics, but national politics as well. Helping Kinky is sticking it to George W. Bush.
http://www.delusionaldemocracy.com
Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government. His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the National Governors Association. He advocates a Second American Revolution.
Kinky is a clown. His campaign serves as a release-valve for the pressure building against both corrupt parties in power.
Big Jew Greenspan predicted the rise of a third party months ago. I predicted that it would be controlled by jews when it came about. Freidman doesn't have a party as such but serves as an example of the jews' intention to control any voice of protest against their ownership of US government and policy.
<H3 class=post-title>Greenspan: Third Party May Be Imminent
Via Political Wire: the Wall Street Journal reports today (subscription wall, unfortunately) that in a recent speech, recently-retired Fed chairman Alan Greenspan predicted the rise of a centrist third party in America. According to the report, Greenspan said that the Democrat and Republican parties are:
"controlled by their extreme wings, even though the voting public is far more centrist... He described the leadership of the parties as 'bimodal', meaning clustered at the extreme ideological ends, whereas the voting public was 'monomodal', meaning clustered near the middle.
Such situations, he said, create an opening for a third-party candidate who appeals to the center. That, he said, could prompt the candidates of the other two parties to move back to the center, for fear of losing. He said the U.S. political system makes it difficult for a third-party candidate to win."
</H3>
http://chargingrino.blogspot.com/2006/02/greenspan-third-party-may-be-imminent.html
Hmmph!
What is a neo progressive?
Form follows function --Louis Sullivan
What is a neo progressive?
For that matter, what is a Judeochristian? That's what the lying kike, "Kinky", claims to be.
Hmmph!
What is a neo progressive?
It looks to be a term (possibly coined by Hirschhorn himself) used to describe fervent anti-Republicans who are going to vote for Democratic candidates simply to oust Republicans from power. They are people who may not agree in full with or even be fully familiarized with Democratic ideology, but will vote Democratic regardless out of their hatred for Republicans, who they view as the source of all political woe in the United States. He views these individuals as bad since, in their zeal to deal defeat to Republicans, they tacitly accept the flaws (special interest pandering, etc.) inherent to the Democratic party. It basically describes a reflexive, knee-jerk response to a problem too complex to be solved by such a simplistic reaction. Here Hirschhorn defends his position:
What is now apparent is that we have a whole lot of "neo-progressives," people who have no hesitancy in supporting mainstream Democrats in the name of defeating Republicans. Neo-progressives cannot resist the temptation to support the lesser-evil as a pragmatic strategy, justified in the name of saving the country from yet more years of Republican dominance.
Neo-progressives seem blind to the fundamental deficiencies of the Democratic Party and its candidates. The concept of a two-party duopoly and the reality that Democrats as well as Republicans are beholding to many special economic interests, are also corrupt and dishonest, and when in power do not seriously pursue what were historic progressive and populist values - all seem now to be lost in the pseudo-ecstasy of anticipating a Democratic victory this year, enough to take over one or both houses of congress. Objective reality is lost in the heat of anti-Republican anger and frustration. Neo-progressives, it seems to me, have let their emotions out-gun their deeper intellectual knowledge and principles. They seem drunk from drinking Democratic Party Kool-aid.
While his descripton of the neo-progressive problem seems sound enough, his solution to the problem, which includes fostering support for independent kike goof-balls like Kinky Friedman, shows that this fellow doesn't have the best of intentions. The take-home lesson from all this is that the jews aren't stupid; they get the sense that the goyim may be tiring of the system's current two party "Punch & Judy Show" iteration. Rest assured that jews will be ready to co-opt whatever bears the most promise for replacing neo-conservatism/neo-progression.