How do you know it was Lebs? It could have been Mel Gibson for all you know.

While Mel Gibson may have played a few heroic characters, he has never been superman. If he was in Australia we would know about it. He would be a lot happier if he and his family were in Australia, but I guess he has his reasons for being in the US.

You are right in suggesting that it is not just the lebs that hate the jews in Sydney, but the lebs have a recent history of violence against people, cars, and buildings, including fire-bombing a christian church in retaliation for our 5,000 strong Cronulla beach protest.

[quote="Doppelhaken
I'm sure it's just a coincidence you show up when jews needs PR help.

Perhaps I should be offended, but I have always said that neither the jews nor the lebs belong in Australia.

If you want to get into an argument about how lebanese or iranians are white people, then I really couldn't be bothered.

"A nigger is a nigger, same as a sand-nigger."

Has Howard not, on several occasions, as you stated earlier yourself, verbally fellated George W. Bush?

Hasn't Australia committed military forces to Iraq in support of the Zionist war of agression on the Iraqi people, to make the middle east safer for the jews?

If I were Australian, that would be all the evidence of jew influence over my government, that I would need. But I'm American, so I know full well that the jew hides himself to a much greater extent than the influence he exerts. There are very few jew members of the U.S. Congress. Very few jew anchors or major media personalities on TV in the U.S. But none of that changes the fact that American news media are practically an extension of the Israeli government, and every member of congress, save perhaps for negress Cynthia McKinney, get down on their knees regularly to verbally fellate their Holy, Sacred, and Magical joos. It's no different in your country, just less obvious, and less pervasive. You may still have decent communities and decent television shows (my Wife is a big fan of "McLeod's Daughters" which we get on satellite here) but the jew has the power where it counts. (i.e., I still have a veritable arsenal of legal firearms, but you and your countrymen don't, explain that but for jew influence)

Yes there are Australians in Iraq, just as there were Australians in Afghanistan, just as there were Australians in Vietnam.

Whether any of these battles was the right thing to be involved in for either country, is a matter that will continue to be debated for many more decades, yet Australia and the US have been allies since WWII.

As for "McLeod's Daughters", I must admit I have never watched a whole episode, but I do know someone who did actually meet the actor Myles Pollard in Sydney before he was on television. He holds personal views about politics that are more in tune with a city dweller than his television character.

As for your legal firearms, I am guessing you mean those that come from the first ammendment to the US Constitution. While the High Court of Australia has given a limited implied right of political free speech to our constitution, the world was a different place in 1901, when the Australian Constitution was adopted by the former colonies which became States. However this new national parliament did pass immigration laws which gave affect to the "White Australia Policy", which remained in force until the late 1960's.

Oh please, Jews controlled every part of the former British Empire, this is well known.

It never ceases to amaze me how in everywhere else besides America "White Nationalists" would rather fight Brown people than destroy the Jews, who were in fact the ones who brought the damn BROWNS there in the first place.

When will the VNN multimedia section be online again? You really need to see the December 2005 video of 5,000 young white Australians rallying and chanting about the violence and intimidation of the lebanese thugs who came from the ghettos and mosques in the south-west of Sydney to the beaches on the coast.

http://www.cjp.org/content_display.html?ArticleID=192218

World Jewry
Home > World Jewry > As Conflicts in Mideast Heat Up, So Does Anti-Semitism Worldwide

As Conflicts in Mideast Heat Up, So Does Anti-Semitism Worldwide

By Jennifer Jacobson

WASHINGTON, Aug. 14 (JTA) -- Since the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah began in mid-July, a form of hate older than the Jewish state increasingly is rearing its ugly head: anti-Semitism.

July saw an attack against a synagogue in Sydney, Australia, vandalism of synagogues and Jewish businesses in Miami and a fatal shooting at Seattle's Jewish federation.

August brought more of the same: Molotov cocktails and rocks were thrown at a synagogue in Brazil, a menorah was smashed at a Jewish chapel near Los Angeles and anti-Israel vandals defaced some 20 Jewish shops in Rome.

It's no coincidence that the number of attacks against Jews and Jewish institutions spikes at a time of violence in the Middle East, as people sympathetic to the Arab cause often take out their anger at Israel on Jews closer to home.

Jews in Europe typically bear the brunt of attacks far more than U.S. Jews. After the Palestinian intifada began in September 2000, anti-Semitic incidents in Europe skyrocketed.

"This country does not have the tradition of political violence and extremism that Europe has," says Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League.

The United States also has fewer frustrated and angry immigrants from Arab and Muslim countries, he says. More importantly, Foxman contends, the United States has made sure perpetrators pay the consequences for anti-Semitic acts.

But even if Israel's war in Lebanon resumes, American Jews' security will not be threatened significantly, say Jewish leaders, who already have stepped up security measures at community organizations.

That may not be true for Jews in Europe and elsewhere, however.

Britain in particular has seen a spike in anti-Semitic incidents following the start of the war in Lebanon. The Community Security Trust, which monitors the security of British Jewry, has recorded at least 90 such incidents during July, says Mark Gardner, the group's spokesman.

The incidents are primarily nonviolent and tend to involve abusive rhetoric, threats, e-mails and graffiti.

There's "a range of things being said," Gardner says, "most commonly, sympathy for Hezbollah and calling Israel 'Nazis,' and at the same time saying Hitler should have finished off the Jews."

In an average month, when tensions in the Middle East are not running high, Gardner says the Trust records 20-40 anti-Semitic incidents. During the 1990s, before the intifada, those figures were substantially lower, some 15-25 per month.

In 2004 the Trust saw a record high of 532 incidents. In 2005 that number dropped to 455, still the second-highest total since CST began recording such incidents in 1984.

Gardner calls conflicts in the Middle East "trigger events." When accusations against Israel intensify -- some in Britain have accused Israel recently of propagating a massacre in Lebanon -- people "take their hatred out on any Jew they can find," Gardner says.

In Britain, anti-Israel sentiment has become conflated with anti-Semitism, he says. This results in Jews becoming scapegoats for Israeli policy, and increases their chances of coming under attack.

Despite the recent spate of incidents, members of the Jewish community continue to lead their lives, Gardner says.

"There isn't panic," he says.

Anti-Semitic incidents also have risen in the United States in the wake of fighting in Lebanon.

According to the ADL's annual audits, anti-Semitic incidents in the United States had declined slightly before the war began. The ADL's most recent audit recorded 1,757 anti-Semitic incidents in 2005, slightly down from 1,821 incidents in 2004, the highest level of U.S. anti-Semitism in nine years.

Foxman expects that when the group tallies the number of incidents for 2006, the figure will again be higher.

Still, that doesn't mean anti-Semitism here will approach the levels of Europe during the intifada.

In the United States, there's "less tolerance for racism, bigotry and anti-Semitic behavior," Foxman says. And Americans are much quicker than Europeans to condemn such behavior, calling it "un-American, immoral, un-Christian."

Other experts on anti-Semitism agree.

In the United States, "it's really hard to find a Jew who cannot participate in their society either individually or collectively on a day-to-day basis because of fear of anti-Semitism," says Jerome Chanes, author of "A Dark Side of History: Anti-Semitism through the Ages."

Meanwhile, he says, whatever anti-Semitic expression there is in Europe is related to the state of security of Jews there, which is not the case in the United States.

While the Seattle shooting was directly related to the Middle East conflict -- the shooter, a radical Muslim, said he acted out of anger toward Israel -- Chanes emphasizes that it's still a single incident in a country of 280 million people.

Neil Kressel believes he knows why there haven't been more such attacks. In publications and religious sermons coming out of most Muslim countries, "you find hate on the level of Nazism in terms of demonization of Jews," says Kressel, a professor of psychology at William Paterson University of New Jersey and author of "Mass Hate: The Global Rise of Genocide and Terror." "That hatred does not appear as much in Western Muslim populations or mosques."

The chance that frustrated Muslims will turn hateful words into violent actions is much greater in Europe, given its history of Nazism and the fact that its social contract and application of free-speech laws differ greatly from America's, says Shai Franklin, director of international organizations at the World Jewish Congress.

"We give people more latitude in what they say," he says. "In Europe, the effect of words can be a lot more incendiary, and the political atmosphere, the press atmosphere is much more critical of Israel."

Rabbi Marvin Hier is frustrated at the importance pundits place on trying to find out why. The founder and dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center has grown weary of the constant refrain that the West must understand the root causes of Islamic fundamentalism and that these people are really angry over injustice at the hands of the West.

"Why should we understand the root causes?" Rabbi Hier asks. "They're the only people in the history of the world who've been angry? Other people do not behave in that manner. That's what we should understand."

© JTA. Reproduction of material without written permission is strictly prohibited.

http://www.cjp.org/content_display.html?ArticleID=192218

When will the VNN multimedia section be online again? You really need to see the December 2005 video of 5,000 young white Australians rallying and chanting about the violence and intimidation of the lebanese thugs who came from the ghettos and mosques in the south-west of Sydney to the beaches on the coast.

Stop thinking so small scale, the larger enemy is the Jews who vocally defend the presence of minorities in your country. I've spoken to plenty of Australians recently and the majority of them admit that the TV media in your country defends the rights of the Arabs to live there and condemns the Whites who oppose them. Australian media is JEWISH, remove their power.

While Mel Gibson may have played a few heroic characters, he has never been superman. If he was in Australia we would know about it. He would be a lot happier if he and his family were in Australia, but I guess he has his reasons for being in the US.

You are right in suggesting that it is not just the lebs that hate the jews in Sydney, but the lebs have a recent history of violence against people, cars, and buildings, including fire-bombing a christian church in retaliation for our 5,000 strong Cronulla beach protest.

You post a story of Lebanese attacking a synagogue and you expect us to get angry at the Lebanese? Maybe you aren't familiar with the ideology of VNN?

NO JEWS, JUST RIGHT

Stop thinking so small scale, the larger enemy is the Jews who vocally defend the presence of minorities in your country. I've spoken to plenty of Australians recently and the majority of them admit that the TV media in your country defends the rights of the Arabs to live there and condemns the Whites who oppose them. Australian media is JEWISH, remove their power.

A lot of Australian media is left-wing, but that does not make it jewish.

You will even find some left-wing media elements attacking israel, and defending arabs in lebanon.

I live in a predominantly white nation, and want to keep it that way. That means opposing any group which threatens our way of life, from muslims to jews.

You should widen your narrow focus, beyond your national borders, and concentrate on those issues which either strengthen or weaken the advancement of the global white race.

You post a story of Lebanese attacking a synagogue and you expect us to get angry at the Lebanese? Maybe you aren't familiar with the ideology of VNN?

NO JEWS, JUST RIGHT

Are you a white man promoting and defending white people, or are you a non-white man opposing jews?

You have to recognise that just as you have blacks, spics, and assorted coloureds attacking the white race in the USA, we have a similar problem here in Australia with lebanese thugs including muslims attacking white people.

You only have to look at the work of the BNP, the British National Party, in defending the UK against the muslim takeover. There is plenty of information on the net including BNPtv, which is most insightful.
http://www.bnp.org.uk/bnptv/bnptv.php

Have you not seen the home grown UK muslims who planned to bomb planes travelling from the UK to the US?

Yes the slogan of VNN is "No jews, just right", yet I see numerous news stories about blacks and niggers and spics and so on and so forth.

"sand-niggers", arabs from lebanon and the middle-east are just as dangerous as jews.

"Just right" means to me right-wing views, not including zionism, but those views which are beneficial to white people.

No muslims or jews, just white.

Is that an ideology which you can support?

No muslims or jews, Just White.

A lot of Australian media is left-wing, but that does not make it jewish.

How do you know it isn't Jewish?

Yes there are Australians in Iraq, just as there were Australians in Afghanistan, just as there were Australians in Vietnam.

Whether any of these battles was the right thing to be involved in for either country, is a matter that will continue to be debated for many more decades, yet Australia and the US have been allies since WWII.

.

You claim to be the hobbit of the shire, yet you support the previous and current government of yours allies of Mordor (NewYork/Israel) who fought against Gondor (Third Reich/Axis Power),the defenders of middle earth.

How do you know it isn't Jewish?

I know of some journalists who are white and who are also very aware of the jews.

There are also some journalists who are white, and either right-wing or left-wing, and who are not supportive of the actions of israel.

There are also many journalists who I have encountered at university who are catholics and protestants and jedi (on their census form), yet who are certainly not jewish by either race or religion, yet they are part of the profession of journalism.

There are very few jews in Australian journalism.

You claim to be the hobbit of the shire, yet you support the previous and current government of yours allies of Mordor (NewYork/Israel) who fought against Gondor (Third Reich/Axis Power),the defenders of middle earth.

The imperial japanese were the greatest threat to Australia. We had japanese submarines in Sydney Harbour during WWII.

A world war, by definition, involves more than two countries.

I have only seen each of the "Lord of the Rings" movies once or twice, yet Sutherland Shire Council municipality, known in Sydney as "The Shire" is the place where I live.

I am also much taller and blonder than most fictional screen hobbits.

I recognise the jewish influence over the current US government, yet I also recognise and support the historical and current alliance between Australia and the United States, for reasons which I have described in this VNN thread.

The imperial japanese were the greatest threat to Australia. We had japanese submarines in Sydney Harbour during WWII.

A world war, by definition, involves more than two countries.

.

In war time, there are no neutral countries. All bets are off. You’re either for or against. Such was Australia at the time allies of FDR that provoked Japan attack from the oil embargo. Just what the Jew York needed to engage in the war and all of its resource in Europe, while leaving Australia allies of war-monger FDR, in perilous from Japan's sworn enemy. Frankly, your country was and is expendable. Advancing the NWO.

In war time, there are no neutral countries. All bets are off. You’re either for or against. Such was Australia at the time allies of FDR that provoked Japan attack from the oil embargo. Just what the Jew York needed to engage in the war and all of its resource in Europe, while leaving Australia allies of war-monger FDR, in perilous from Japan's sworn enemy. Frankly, your country was and is expendable. Advancing the NWO.

wtf is NWO?