Who the fuck give a royal shit about some idgit in Limeyland?
I think we all should. The race problems and crazy laws spawned to deal with them are a good preview of what we'll get here if we don't change this government.
My first impression of this guy, don't know why, but I thought he looked like a young Popeye the sailor heh
This guy will probably do years in prison just for voicing his mind.
It's hard to believe there is a more PC fucked up place than the US,but apparently The UK is it.
Much of Europe is that way now. Don't forget Canada. Bad as the USA is, whites are still pretty free here. Relatively.
.
Neil Martin is accused of stirring up racial hatred by putting insults on the Niggaz.com site after it became a shrine to the murdered teenager. In September, Martin, of Hillary Crescent, Maghull, was arrested after friends of Anthony Walker complained to police about offensive postings on the website.
Police decided to charge him with 33 child porn offences after they examined his computer and then sent a file to the Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, to ask whether they should prosecute Martin over the racism allegations.
Lord Goldsmith told police to charge him with racially aggravated harassment causing alarm or distress and stirring up racial hatred, offences which carry a maximum sentence of seven years in prison.
During the jewish war against Lebanon and Iraq, British mainstream websites were full of demands by the kikes and their lickspittle to murder the population of those countires. I guess inciting to kill goyim is OK according to Lord Goldsmith.
"People, look at the evidence the truth is there you just have to look for it!!!!!" - Joe Vialls
Fight jewish censorship, use
[color="Sienna"]
a possible sentence of seven years for posting some not so PC words on the internet. I can't belive that so many people actually approve or are indifferent when it comes to shit like this.
Now perhaps you will wake up and see how our people are being oppressed by draconian jewish laws in Britain.
Somehow I doubt that you will.
Playerz? Are they football playerz or what?
Who the fuck give a royal shit about some idgit in Limeyland?
We do. He's white. Is there some other basis upon which you are a White Nationalist?
I give a shit about this guy. While I definitely care more about matters in the US (because I live here), the racial matters in the UK will come to haunt us soon enough. Ever notice how people look to other countries for inspiration on their newest tyrranical ideas? Yeah, there are plenty of them here who would LOVE to see the US with UK style draconian laws, if not back under the Crown.
To paraphrase the old V-8 commercial: He coulda used an ice axe himself instead of his blue shirt and grey suit and tie.
Yeah really,
its just a matter of time befor it gets worse here in the US.
Well, at least the blessed denizens of the Sceptered Isle have some good news to celebrate:
[color="Red"]Madonna's Malawi baby lands in UKOct 17 2006
The Malawian baby whom Madonna is hoping to adopt has arrived in the UK.
Let us take a perilous journey inside Madonna's cavernous cranium:
"This'll show that Jolie cunt who's still got it! But now that that I've had him for a few days.....well hell, gotta face facts here - he does look 'n' smell like Mr. Hankey. On the other hand, he matches my dark brown Prada handbag perfectly....."
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath
"The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin
US plans to 'fight the net' revealed
A newly declassified document gives a fascinating glimpse into the US military's plans for "information operations" - from psychological operations, to attacks on hostile computer networks.
Bloggers beware.
As the world turns networked, the Pentagon is calculating the military opportunities that computer networks, wireless technologies and the modern media offer.
From influencing public opinion through new media to designing "computer network attack" weapons, the US military is learning to fight an electronic war.
The declassified document is called "Information Operations Roadmap". It was obtained by the National Security Archive at George Washington University using the Freedom of Information Act.
Officials in the Pentagon wrote it in 2003. The Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, signed it.
The "roadmap" calls for a far-reaching overhaul of the military's ability to conduct information operations and electronic warfare. And, in some detail, it makes recommendations for how the US armed forces should think about this new, virtual warfare.
The document says that information is "critical to military success". Computer and telecommunications networks are of vital operational importance.
Propaganda
The operations described in the document include a surprising range of military activities: public affairs officers who brief journalists, psychological operations troops who try to manipulate the thoughts and beliefs of an enemy, computer network attack specialists who seek to destroy enemy networks.
All these are engaged in information operations.
Perhaps the most startling aspect of the roadmap is its acknowledgement that information put out as part of the military's psychological operations, or Psyops, is finding its way onto the computer and television screens of ordinary Americans.
"Information intended for foreign audiences, including public diplomacy and Psyops, is increasingly consumed by our domestic audience," it reads.
"Psyops messages will often be replayed by the news media for much larger audiences, including the American public," it goes on.
The document's authors acknowledge that American news media should not unwittingly broadcast military propaganda. "Specific boundaries should be established," they write. But they don't seem to explain how.
"In this day and age it is impossible to prevent stories that are fed abroad as part of psychological operations propaganda from blowing back into the United States - even though they were directed abroad," says Kristin Adair of the National Security Archive.
Credibility problem
Public awareness of the US military's information operations is low, but it's growing - thanks to some operational clumsiness.
Late last year, it emerged that the Pentagon had paid a private company, the Lincoln Group, to plant hundreds of stories in Iraqi newspapers. The stories - all supportive of US policy - were written by military personnel and then placed in Iraqi publications.
And websites that appeared to be information sites on the politics of Africa and the Balkans were found to be run by the Pentagon.
But the true extent of the Pentagon's information operations, how they work, who they're aimed at, and at what point they turn from informing the public to influencing populations, is far from clear.
The roadmap, however, gives a flavour of what the US military is up to - and the grand scale on which it's thinking.
It reveals that Psyops personnel "support" the American government's international broadcasting. It singles out TV Marti - a station which broadcasts to Cuba - as receiving such support.
It recommends that a global website be established that supports America's strategic objectives. But no American diplomats here, thank you. The website would use content from "third parties with greater credibility to foreign audiences than US officials".
It also recommends that Psyops personnel should consider a range of technologies to disseminate propaganda in enemy territory: unmanned aerial vehicles, "miniaturized, scatterable public address systems", wireless devices, cellular phones and the internet.
'Fight the net'
When it describes plans for electronic warfare, or EW, the document takes on an extraordinary tone.
It seems to see the internet as being equivalent to an enemy weapons system.
"Strategy should be based on the premise that the Department [of Defense] will 'fight the net' as it would an enemy weapons system," it reads.
The slogan "fight the net" appears several times throughout the roadmap.
The authors warn that US networks are very vulnerable to attack by hackers, enemies seeking to disable them, or spies looking for intelligence.
"Networks are growing faster than we can defend them... Attack sophistication is increasing... Number of events is increasing."
US digital ambition
And, in a grand finale, the document recommends that the United States should seek the ability to "provide maximum control of the entire electromagnetic spectrum".
US forces should be able to "disrupt or destroy the full spectrum of globally emerging communications systems, sensors, and weapons systems dependent on the electromagnetic spectrum".
Consider that for a moment.
The US military seeks the capability to knock out every telephone, every networked computer, every radar system on the planet.
Are these plans the pipe dreams of self-aggrandising bureaucrats? Or are they real?
The fact that the "Information Operations Roadmap" is approved by the Secretary of Defense suggests that these plans are taken very seriously indeed in the Pentagon.
And that the scale and grandeur of the digital revolution is matched only by the US military's ambitions for it.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/americas/4655196.stm
.
I feel sorry for you blokes, since you don't have something there like the First Amendment to protect you.
However the jew supported commies/ antifa queens like to make things difficult for all of us activists. Me and some friends gave these morons the old "bait-and-switch" trick. We told them where we were going to be and they showed up. Only thing is that we were hardly anywhere near there!:D
Britain has always been a light for the rest of us WN/WP. You gave us Skrewdriver and WP music, Skinhead culture plus formed and established a paleoconservative party that is successful in elections!:cheers:
Where can we send some support for this gentleman?:cheers:
I don't know Luke, but I do know Simon, he is not a bad man and I doubt if he has ever hurt anyone in his life. But then certain individuals can have you prosecuted for assaulting their feelings in this one time Land of Hope & Glory.
The redscum and liberal faggots have been looking for ways to get British Nationalists arrested even if we are using websites and servers outside the UK. Heretical is on a US server and therefore should be protected by the American first amendment. The thought police here in the UK are making up new rules as they go along. And they are getting away with it too...
Fuck the Pentagon and the kikes!:mad:
US plans to 'fight the net' revealed
A newly declassified document gives a fascinating glimpse into the US military's plans for "information operations" - from psychological operations, to attacks on hostile computer networks.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/americas/4655196.stm
[color="red"]Music:
"Traditional definitions don't really apply. A conservative wants to conserve. Conserve what? A liberal, by the established definition is no good for us.
....
Liberal and conservative are political terms. WN is based on race. All else is secondary.
We have to put aside the old labels. Neither fits us. We are racialists."~Muad'Dib
It's getting to be the same here in Australia. Lots of PC laws to 'protect' people from abuse, discrimination etc...
Aust has HUGE numbers of Asians and Arabs - all third world trash - I'm angry that my country is being trashed by those scum and of course all the new laws to 'protect' them.
Your land is only what you can take and hold.
[color="Navy"]US plans to 'fight the net' revealed
The 'nife [K]utz both ways. The Chinese have a similar operation -- directed toward the Jewnited Statez. As 'our' own government would use this tecnology against itz people, China would use it against THEM, if only to bring the economy to its knees! I find this to be of some consolation.
-
-
-
All is for naught without a good edJEW(K)shen.
[ Educational sites ]
JimInCO:[color="Blue"](How long before this happens in the US? I'd receive a few dozen life sentences, at least.
)
I'd probably do 7 to life in Germany or Britain for my Heidi Klum offering alone.
I say "to life" because my captors would probably require a formal declaration of remorse for my insensitive and 'inciteful' (pun intended) diatribe.
Of course i would tell them to get bent and boldly reiterate my eternal query as to Ms. Klum's character status. There seems to be a consensus in my Klum thread -that indeed Ms. Klum is nothing less than a self-hating, race traitor, Negro's whore.
I am thankful to reside in a country which at least 'nominally' guarantees a right to free speech. I haven't visited my ancestral homeland of Germany for almost 15 years because i would most certainly be arrested within 15 minutes of stepping off the plain because within 15 minutes of stepping off the plain I would have told some obnoxious Turk or dictatorial elitist Jew to: Mach dir den Mund zu, und haue ab. Von meiner Heimat heraus! Verdammte Scheißstück!. = shut the bloody hell up you fucking piece of shit! Get out of my homeland!
I could never hold my tongue, even under penalty of prosecution. I am pathological that way:D
Sorry Cousin Ewald, once again I won't be making the Family reunion in Stuttgart this Summer....lol
Let's us always remember our prisoners of conscious. I haven't seen one yet, but perhaps we need a prisoners of war thread to commemorate our imprisoned comrades?
_GM.
_Retired.
Who the fuck give a royal shit about some idgit in Limeyland?
Write this one off as a troll.
If by the instrument of governmental power, a people is led towards its destruction, then rebellion is not only the right of every member of such a people . . . it is his duty. - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. - Sir Winston Spencer Churchill