Thanks for this video, Mark. An excellent find. Shayler is knowledgeable and courageous.

Isn't 'Margolis', as in the opposition panelist a jewish name?

Isn't 'Margolis', as in the opposition panelist a jewish name?

Yeah he's a kike, go figure....

David Shayler lists off many of the main points that prove 911 was an inside job. Then at the end he starts talking about something other than planes hitting the towers. What is this theory that something other than large aircraft hit the twin towers? The Loose Change video makes a similar claim. After watching the Sky News broadcast I looked up the videos that purport to show a missile being fired from the aircraft the moment before impact occurs. I’m not positive if this is what David Shayler is referring to. The videos are very blurry and inconclusive in my opinion. I’m not a 911 scholar so maybe I’m missing something here:

What would the purpose of launching a missile just before impact be? Wouldn’t it have been less complicated and risky to plant explosives in the plane rather then fire a missile in plain view at the last moment? What would be the point anyway? The buildings were already packed with high explosives.

If the theory is true, and missiles were fired as a round about way of creating a more explosive impact, then I would conclude that the people who arranged for the planes to crash into the towers were not aware of the controlled demolition part of the operation. If the theory is correct.

There is lots of good solid evidence proving that 911 was an inside job. Truth advocates should stick to those points.