at least tehy have no niggers their to mix with. its beter to have 100 pure strong children then 200 halfbloods

..."A child is not an easy project, and in this world a woman is expected to get an education, find a job and make a career," she told CSM. "It won't change anything [to have more money]."

...finding a quality husband is becoming a problem and many women choose to remain single or go to another country in search of a relationship.

Thanks to bolshevism, Russia was one of the very first countries to install bulldyke feminism and enforce it with iron writs of law. Women became driven then vicious then neurotic. Men became world-champion shirkers and vodka drinkers.

And better yet, other Europeans and Americans had all the proof they needed of this when they installed feminism themselves later on.

Dump girl power or the birthrates stay flat or collapse. It is related to the other crimp in white population growth: Wage. Feminism rips the bottom out of the aggregate wage, forcing men and women to compete against each other in the marketplace. This is poison for the morale of both and the birthrate always tanks.

In a significant way Russia might just have the worst of both worlds right now. Feminism was rammed down their throats when the "market" was officially excoriated. Now that the market is God, feminism lingers. In corporate economies women always have an edge the same way men have an edge in hunting packs. Corporations are fake families allowing female virtues to shine in the same way hunting packs allow men to indulge in rogue-male behavior that supports the tribe.

The real question I'm wondering is can a nation that embraces feminism get rid of it without collapsing altogether? Being married to an antifeminist lady for many years helps, but it's a serious question. There were Brit writers a century ago after the women got the vote saying that feminism is one of the dead-sure signs of a culture in terminal decline. There's still time for them to be proven right.

The real question I'm wondering is can a nation that embraces feminism get rid of it without collapsing altogether? Being married to an antifeminist lady for many years helps, but it's a serious question. There were Brit writers a century ago after the women got the vote saying that feminism is one of the dead-sure signs of a culture in terminal decline. There's still time for them to be proven right.

I think the key word here is "feminism".
By all means, we need to eradicate the false premise of feminism from our culture. By the same token, White women should be allowed to participate in areas where they have shown themselves to be competent and beneficial to the overall health of our society.
To say that a woman who is intrigued with applying her brain power and feminine perceptions to medicine or research is a detriment to our culture would be doing the woman and our race an injustice.
It is important that our women realize that they do not have to be a "feminist" to be able to apply themselves in any area that is beneficial to society.
I have met many such intelligent women who apply their skills to the good of The Cause. They do this as women, and have no desire to be a feminist.
Just as I respect a White male farmer for his knowledge and skills in his area, I also respect White female women who use their knowledge and intellect to produce well-being for our race.
Feminism is the enemy, it turns intelligent respectable White women into demanding authoritative obnoxious detriments to our society.
I.E. Hillary Clinton

ZOGCRUSHER1488

Yes. Fuck yes.

Yes. Fuck yes.

yes, we gotta crush ZOG :cheers:

Laws are to society like dust-cropping is to crop-fields. Left to nature's way, fields will always suffer some loss to pests, but, with proper methods, yields can be maintained over the long haul. Once insecticides are introduced, however, then you just cannot abruptly stop, lest you lose ALL your yield to pests. Insecticides kill the beneficials first, and the pests last. Pests are the FIRST to return afterwards, and beneficials are the very last to finally return.

In society, absent laws, people are held in check mostly by morals and shame (of being shunned by their peers). These traits are like beneficials, and they are not perfect, but, over the long haul, they serve to provide the growth and maintenance of a healthy nation. When you introduce laws (such as child-support, no fault divorce, compulsory attendance, affirmative action, etc.), then, the beneifical effects of morals and shame are the first things people forget about, and they are driven BY THE LAWS to look after themsevles first, and you then cannot abruptly stop the laws lest you suffer the worst effects of no morals nor shame for probably as much as a whole generation.

Only after we come to believe, after many years, that we really are free of these overbearing laws, will the folks once again bring morals and shame back.

We will either continue with these laws, or go through a lengthy period of suffering before nature gets us back into balance.

Do we, as a nation, more specifically a WHITE nation, have the courage and FAITH in our race to drop these laws and leave people to decide all by themselves, on their own honor, to do right by their fellow whites? I do. I am ready - I was always ready, and I stubbornly have NEVER accepted that we need so-called "civil" laws dealing with family, school, and work. I am in a very small minority.

The Christian Science Monitor is a marxist jew rag. I give little credence to any anti-white marxist reporter and her (or even his) "research."

That Putin is taking such dramatic open steps to counter the jew-created white population down trend is GOOD NEWS!!!

Will he succeed? Takes time to turn a large Russian ship. The first step is to begin to turn the wheel. Putin is doing that. Again, encouraging news.

There is way too much jew influence or control of Russia's media. I think Putin has made some headway here, but ALL the Russian media needs to be in the hands of pro-white Russians. Kick the kikes out of Russia altogether. Of course, doing the latter is what set in motion the destruction of Germany and the White West in WWII. But it has to be done anyway. One difference between then and now is that Russia is a nuclear power second only to the Kwa. That's a big difference. For JOG to start a war with Russia would be suicidal for JOG. JOG knows that and will only do so if it looks like it's over for them anyway. If JOG goes down, they plan to take down the whole world with them. Probably gradualism is the key -- as it has been against us by the jews. Hard for JOG to know when to pull the trigger when the pot with the jew frog is heating up gradually. (I think Putin and perhaps China are using this gradualistic approach to dealing with JOG.)

But total Russian pro-white control of the media will probably bring the Russian women around fairly quickly. Women, with their lower IQ and social proclivities and natural irrationality, are completely suggestible to whatever is shown by the media as popular. They're utterly at the mercy of "popularity." So popularity must be taken out of the enemy's hands.

Determining the potential success of Putin's brand new policy change by interviewing white women in jew "family planning" (read family murdering) centers is obviously only the place to start if you want to create a sense of defeatism. These are the most militant anti-self, anti-men, anti-child feminists -- or they would not be there to murder their children and avoid motherhood. These extremist idiots will be the LAST to get on board. Instead, marxists, interview the normal, pro-motherhood women at this stage. Will THEY want to have MORE children? Five years from now, marxists, interview the extremist remaining "family planning" women.

JOG to start a war with Russia would be suicidal for JOG. JOG knows that and will only do so if it looks like it's over for them anyway.

Are you sane? The United States would utterly crush Russia militarily, unless you factor out our resources currently bogged down in Iraq. China could also take Russia.

Are you sane? The United States would utterly crush Russia militarily, unless you factor out our resources currently bogged down in Iraq. China could also take Russia.

stupid yellow chinks and kwa nigers would be no match for rusian aryans :box:

Are you sane? The United States would utterly crush Russia militarily, unless you factor out our resources currently bogged down in Iraq. China could also take Russia.

If I recall correctly, Napoleon had similar misconceptions about Russia.

Some months ago Paul Wolfowitz, former jewish Bush handler and now president of the World Bank, said Russia needs to import more turd-worlders to offset this population shortfall. He might even tie the granting of future loans to an open immigration policy. Russia can then be a multicultural paradise like the US.

Some months ago Paul Wolfowitz, former jewish Bush handler and now president of the World Bank, said Russia needs to import more turd-worlders to offset this population shortfall. He might even tie the granting of future loans to an open immigration policy. Russia can then be a multicultural paradise like the US.

Russia is now, I read a while ago, debt free -- at least vis a vis the JOG world bank. It is a relatively or potentially or increasingly wealthy nation because of its oil output and other natural resources. Russia doesn't need loans from JOG. But the question of whether Putin will defend his people by halting immigration of non-whites is still an open one. It is most encouraging, though, that he is about the only White leader who has begun showing genuine concern about declining White Russian population. This suggests that he may take the next step along these lines and strictly limit non-white immigration. We'll see.

Are you sane? The United States would utterly crush Russia militarily, unless you factor out our resources currently bogged down in Iraq. China could also take Russia.

Are you sane?

My answer to your point, though, is the following: MAD